As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn't known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it's useful as something to lean back on when it's obvious/egregious like their case.

First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Just say that if it doesn’t have a watermark the poster has to provide a link to the original.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment