all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why not just ban smartphones for people under 18?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The real question is I have a UK originating iPhone that i use just for photographing. I do not live in UK, but the phone is not registered to use gsm in my country since it costs 3 times the price of said iPhone to do so.

    If I update, will it show the ID prompt to me? Because I sure as hell do not have UK ID, so the phone will literally become a brick.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    If you're very quick about it, iOS 26.3.1 is still signed so you could do the update and downgrade using iTunes if it does ask. You would have to factory reset the phone to downgrade again though and Apple could potentially stop signing it at any point leaving you stuck on 26.4

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Some of my friends don't understand why this is an overreach, "i am over 18 what do i care"...

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Seems like if you’re already using Apple Pay you’re fine. It’s still an egregious overreach and pointless but at least it’s not demanding a full face scan.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Just get a Pixel and install GrapheneOS on it.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 21 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    The move, believed to be a first for a European market, comes amid pressure on tech companies from the government to do more to protect children online.

    Nobody was forced to do this, yet Apple just decided to go first.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    They kinda were. Don't get me wrong, still entirely by choice, but more and more countries and states are forcing OS level age verification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    How things change.

    Once upon a time, Apple stood up to the FBI's demands. Now they're caving to an implication in an authoritarian foreign country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Apple pretended to stand up to them a couple times in high-profile cases for optics. They were helping them all along.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    There is, AFAIK, zero proof to back up your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Even if true, I think I prefer when Apple was normalizing standing up to surveillance, instead of being the first to endorse it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 4 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 8 points 7 months ago
    [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Meanwhile people literally can’t pay their electricity bills. Kier zero-privacy Starmer really prioritising the important things here. Time to look at graphene OS

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago*

    Whilst I would prefer this hadn’t happened, this is by far the best implementation I’ve seen so far. I appreciate not everybody has a credit card, but it’s much, much better to use a form of checking like that which has both an expiry date and a cancellation procedure, unlike a government ID which contains multiple pieces of information which you can’t really change (like your date of birth and a photo)

  • source