all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 7 months ago

Win 11: 👎

Wine 11: 👍👍👍

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I admit I don't know a damn thing about this stuff, but is there any chance this could improve cases where anti-cheat becomes an issue?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Probably not. Wine translates Windows kernel calls to their equivalent Linux kernel calls. Kernel level anti-cheat runs in the kernel space, so it’s not compatible with Wine. That being said, there are Linux versions of most kernel level anti-cheat, game vendors just don’t support them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Client-side anti-cheat is a lie that makes your computer less secure.

    No thanks.

    Anti-cheat belongs on the vendor's hardware, not our untrusted client CPUs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Is that true on Wine/Linux? I tried to look this up a little while ago, but the little I found (that I could understand) was fairly vague. The best I could gather is that "kernel level" anti-cheat in a Linux compatible game runs at the same permission level as the game, so it's not really the same level of concern. Am I misunderstanding that or missing something?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    As well, Call of Duty: Black Ops I is now actually playable on Linux, too.

    Love to see it!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago
    [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    also supports native wayland, without Xwayland translation. start your game with the DISPLAY variable unset to test it (e.g. DISPLAY= mangohud wine ~/Games/TheGame/TheGame.exe

  • source
  • 116 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world view that post
    21 comments in c/linux@lemmy.ml view that post
    20 comments in c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz view that post
    10 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    7 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post