I call fake, no smog anywhere in the first panel
post
Okay, but point of order. Are there any poor people on that train? Cause if there's poors on the train, I'll take the $2B bumper-to-bumper concrete blasphemy instead.
I think it’s possible to accept that, while a city without cars obviously preferable, the electrification of vehicles is still a net positive given the enormous inertia of car culture.
Is it? I think if you include opportunity cost and "well i switched to an electric car now i falsely believe the problem is solved", not so much.
It's just easier, in some ways, because it's a smaller change.
Net positives mean something, though. We want a 10/10 solution, but saying an achievable 6/10 is the same as no change at all is exactly what the people who oppose us want us to think. That if we can’t get rid of every car on the road, we might as well have done nothing. That’s terrible! Of course we can make things incrementally better!
We all want cars to generally go away from what should be walkable areas. Replace them with public transit and bikes and just walking. That kind of culture shift is going to take generations. Less smog and carbon dioxide being spewed into the air is a good thing. (Provided the trend towards solar and wind power continues.)
Assuming people get electric vehicles when their combustion cars reach end of life and not just trading in a four year old SUV for its electric variant, the I think it is.
Ignoring the ideal wherein privately owned vehicles decrease over time, of course. Continued development of EVs will be a benefit in terms of battery technology and motor efficiency, among other things.
The efficiency of an EV SUV will never be anywhere near the efficiency of an (electric) bicycle. Motor and battery efficiency also improves for bicycles. The bicycle will always need only a fraction of the resources, in materials, electricity and occupied space.
Yes I agree. I didn't imply an SUV is somehow better than a few bikes. My comment wasn't an argument for cars nor continuing car dependancy, only touching on a benefit from their manufacture - negatives often do have silver linings.
In a non car dependant future, I'd still expect the buses and ambulances and whatnot else to be electric.
It’s easier because I can make the decision myself and I can do it without much planning or coordination. I replace my car periodically anyway, so there may be no real difference (in my case my ice car was nine years old and I needed something for my teens to use, so an EV was the logical choice)
Modifying a city for walkability takes many years, decades, even assuming everyone else agrees, politicians are supportive, and there is some sort of budget. We can’t afford to just wait for the ideal solution
It embeds the existing dominant individual, resource-wasting mode of transport even deeper into the culture (and urban planning). That makes it a negative for urban environments. Bit different story in very sparsely populated areas.
The only problem they will solve is air/noise pollution and maybe power efficiency. But for urban planning the space usage is the same, and traffic jams are the same. Also they move the same ammount of people.
They are a small upgrade in general (maybe more for cities with high air pollution).
Not much noise reduction. After 50 kph, tires are louder than engines anyways.
Sure there are the occasional busted/"tuned" exhaust comes out very loud, but the majority of the din is just wheels on the road.
While this is true, cars of any kind shouldn't be going faster than 50k in a town/city anyway
is it even that high? in my experience the tyre noise feels louder than most engines down at 40km/h
Yeah even the air they push makes more noise. Electric buses are another story though.
the key thing that makes it an actual positive is bundling electrification with smaller sized vehicles.
If we could have all the new electric cars be smaller and lighter than existing combustion cars then it would actually be an unqualified improvement.
And ideally we could even get people to switch to things that barely even qualify as cars, stuff like the renault twizy
I drive a 2019 Fiat 500e as my daily getting-around-town car. A little more than “barely even a car” but it gets about 80 miles on an overnight charge from a normal 110V outlet.
I would love a small sedan that’s got 200+ miles of range, fast charging, and isn’t made by a company run by a fascist. Nobody seems to want to make them at any price.
Yeah one of the things that made me hate tesla early on is their refusal to make anything other than standard oversized cars, like for fuck's sake they even keep the front bit and put a storage area in it, that's absurd!
And really it's a general problem with the vehicle market, including micromobility. We need more stuff that's between moped and bicycle, and stuff that's between car and motorbike.
America has a more decent selection of sub-moped options, and europe at least has a couple brands of moped cars but they.. have a distinct hot-wheels vibe which doesn't exactly inspire confidence..
And i think we've seen evidence of how much demand there is for these in-between vehicles, e-bike and e-scooters have exploded in popularity.
I like the comparison between the two car dependent panels being the 'same picture' meme, though the electric one should have a few extra columns to support the weight.
Otherwise, 15/15 comic.
Electric car weight is trivial in comparison to heavy trucks, which roads are already constructed for. Electric trucks are another conversation, but currently are still restricted by the same gross weight limits that non electric trucks are, so there really isn’t any reason that there would be extra columns.
I agree, though there are buses and trucks in those panels, and I'd hazard a guess that if the national fleet of vehicles went electric, the gross weight limits might get bumped up a touch.
If I'm remembering right the United States federal limit is 80,000 gross, but there's also a per axle specification. If electric long haulers started becoming more common, I could see the limits being bumped for the whole vehicle, while adding an extra axle or some such.
Depending on where you live in the world it's just not possible for some people to live in one of those idealist walkable cities do to systemic segregation. Can't afford to live there but that particular area still needs workers. This ideal community is reserved for a certain class of people.
If one place is really nice to live while a other is rather shitty, of course everybody will want to live in the nice place, which drives prices up, which means the rich people get to live in the nice place and the poor get to live in the shitty place.
The solution is of course to make all places nice. But ultimately you've got to start with one.
Putting up some bollards to pedestrianize a street isn’t expensive.
I’m not sure where race comes into it.
It’s just car-brained car supremacy.
I never mentioned race.
So what is the “systematic segregation” you mention? Whether they are left-handed or right-handed?
All the more reason to make every community better. If quality of life is improved across the board, then everyone gets access to the benefits and you get rid of the risks of gentrification.
reminder that more than 80% of the american population lives in an urban area
Electric bicycles are EVs. I dislike it when people say EV and they mean EC. It's mostly carbrains who do it.
Looks more like an illustration of gentrification.
You realise the goal is that everyone in a city should have access to public transport and nice communities? Including poor neighbourhoods?
Not sure why you're being downvoted. This is what gentrification looks like.
and this is why i can't take the term "gentrificiation" seriously, it's only ever used to stop things from improving, and only ever used by people living in shitty places rife with systemic oppression.
I never hear people say this shit in the nordics, here we give places lovely makeovers and everyone just goes "ooh, nice"
Hi, I’m posting from the threadiverse on PieFed, so I’m not sure if the tag would help.
Due to the volume I’m post, it would add a lot of workload and time spent when I’m trying to find ways to reduce my time.
I’ve got a lot of posts in queue at the moment, but going forward I’ll try to work out something to get alt-text on them.
Three pictures first: a dystopian tangle of highways labelled "fossil fuel vehicles" second: a dystopian tangle of highways labelled "electric vehicles" third: an idyllic walkavble city labelled "walking biking and public transit".
That took me literally a minute.
Cool so an extra half an hour for this sub alone per day. Considering each post is already a few minutes work to set time fields, find image, and make up a title it all adds up to me not wanting to spend more time than I have too.
I don't think Lemmy or Piefed support hashtags. Personally, I often just do it anyway. See a post without transcription, transcribe it.
Better if OPs do it themselves, but volunteers taking on the effort without need to request permission/be told to do it is second best.
PieFed does support it, not sure if it shows up on Masto though.
Hmm, actually it doesn't look like it does work. In fact, it may be worse than Lemmy. I can see @saltywizard@beige.party's hashtags (as actual hashtags) in Lemmy, but not here on Piefed.
But I can't see my own hashtags in either platform.
edit: wait, looks like both Lemmy and Piefed may work. I can see saltywizard's hashtags as tags on the default Piefed UI, but not in Blorp, which is my preferred Piefed client.
Blorp dev here. I'm not sure I understand hashtags well enough to implement them yet. From what I can tell, @saltywizard@beige.party either manually linked the hashtag to Mastadon, or more likely, whatever client they used inserted the link when they types the hashtag.
To demonstrate my point:
- Here is a hashtag I manually linked #alt4me
- Here is a hashtag I did not manually link #alt4me
In Blorp, 1 is clickable for me, but 2 isn't. Depending on what client you're using, 2 may get auto linked.
Piefed tags appear as Mastodon hashtags, however they may be different, eg Mastodon removes spaces
Workers and Resources: Soviet Republic does the walkable city simulator game really well. If you have enough walking paths, and mass transit, the only things using your roads are the work trucks, fire trucks, and police horses (because fuck the virtual police as well)
you know what you just made me want? a version of... fuck what's that game. oblivion. where all the guards are horses. but nothing else changes. I would like to commission a mod. also a modder to help me get the damn thing to run on my pc.
scratch that i would also like to add a dating sim so you can date the horses.
the right and left are not mutually exclusive, just the artist propagandizes us to think they are
As the number of cars goes up the right begins to look more and more like the left. While both can exist it is not propaganda to compare the two in this way.
i recognize the neighborhood that inspired this drawing (it was a freeway that got pulled out, had nothing to do with fossil fuel vehicles or public transit, it had to do with a rich neighborhood's view). i used to eat calamari rolled up in a newspaper there. this is pure propaganda.
Boston? I thought it was Vienna with the cable car.
Isn't part of the point of the post that the freeways are ugly? Just because it's rich people thinking it's ugly doesn't make it untrue.
the point of the post is that walking, biking, and public transit make cities. not electric vehicles or fossil fuel vehicles. there were already buildings below the freeway. they just demolished it so the financial center and the (usually) rich tourists could have a pretty view. I'd busk there and take the tourists' money, buy calamari, it was great. I'm all for the freeway being gone, don't get me wrong, but it had absolutely nothing to do with public transit. the public transit was better when the freeway was there. like, that's the actual history of the place. it looks like the embarcadero in san francisco. specific corner down by the wharf, viewed from the hilton up in the financial district. like, the top of the hilton. i wish i knew which corner but i only know my way around there on foot. bottommost building in the right picture is a korean restaurant i like.
i could be wrong, this could be someplace else or purely imaginary, but it looks damn close to where i busked. like, it flipped the nostalgia "oh i haven't been home in a while" switch in my brain
top 43 comments