Soon after I joined Lemmy a few years ago, I searched for communities based on my interests and subscribed to the ones with the highest numbers of users to ensure they are active. Sometimes I joined multiple, but then saw that some people post the same thing to more than one, cluttering my feed, so I left the smaller ones.

It's only after my community ban from !games@hexbear.net for disagreeing about Ukraine that I was told about MeanwhileOnGrad, learning exactly what "the tankie triad" means and why big Lemmy instances have defederated from those. Lemmy.ml, where the ML probably stands for Marxist-Leninist, seems to have been defederated by fewer, possibly because it's run by the creator of Lemmy, Dessalines. Nevertheless, there is evidence of Dessalines holding the same authoritarian communist views as the rest.

Recently, there were two posts on !privacy@lemmy.ml about Signal, but then in both cases, admin davel (who is known on MoG for seeing CIA's hand in running Ukraine, among other things) and Dessalines linked (1, 2, 3) the same article by Dessalines, which not only argues Signal could be a CIA honeypot (as if it matters when proper e2ee is used), but also manages to shoehorn China even into that, claiming its government "prefers autonomy". This sort of portrayal of totalitarianism as sovereignty is the reason I unsubscribed from the community. As it has been said by others, ML is not a neutral instance but a means of pushing authoritarian views onto unsuspecting users.

Edit: Made the post title clearer.

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 7 months ago (62 children)

Your life on the fediverse improves significantly if you just block the entire lemmy.ml and hexbear.net instances.

  • source
  • hideshow 62 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    I hear a lot of negative talk about those instances, but rarely any specifics. What's the deal with them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    In my own experience, it's less that they spew out politics and more that they are just so defensive and argumentative. A lot of good lemmy communities are based on discussion and sharing cool stuff, while the denizens of those instances and the like are more online to debate, nitpick, and criticize. Like there could be a post of a dog picture and their comment would be critisizing the owner or introducing some political argument that is distantly related. Like bro, just enjoy the dog picture

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This. I've seen a lot of obnoxious and/or argumentative comments from them, but one that stuck with me was when my first Lemmy instance had to close when Trump was inaugurated due to safety fears.

    The first comment to the announcement post was a hexbear user saying something like "Yeah this is why capitalism doesn't work, America sucks and it needs to go down" -- which I do not disagree with, but the post was the admin sharing genuine fears and talking about the logistics of having to move to another state. The user didn't even say a "I'm sorry you have to close your instance because of this...", just straight up getting into politics when it wasn't the main point of the post.

    (I will always miss you, possumpat.io; I hope the admin is safe and thriving!)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    You touch on the problem with talking with them. You can agree on the problem, get into what can we do about it, they are no, you can't do anything except violently overthrow your government. Also fuck you and I hope you die, their attitude towards us. Some of them.

    Yet if they talked that same talk in those worker paradises of China and Russia they would be committed to re-education camps and gulags.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    I think the behavior surrounding my games@hexbear ban is also indicative not just of their politics but also of their behavior in general. Its moderator reacting to my report of Holodomor denial by publicly saying the comment has been reported by me is highly unethical. Then following my post about the situation (linked in the OP), one of their users reposted that to Hexbear and there were people tagging me as they threw insults at me, which amounts to harassment, considering I've never left a comment in that thread. There were admins in the thread as well, but they only piled on despite their rules prohibiting harassment and insults.

    Edit: Here's a link to some specific examples.

    Edit 2: They're now brigading this thread and tagging me again from here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Huh, okay. I guess I'll avoid going over that way. I'm hesitant to outright mute anything that I don't immediately have a huge issue with in case it becomes a source I learn of something through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Go visit it yourself.

    These folks are specifically trying to stir shit. [It's like walking into an Indian reservation and yelling that we speak English here, that this is a white country and if you don't like it you should go home. Then they try to get the reservation closed due to the roughing up and expulsion they received] The usual form this takes is repeating long debunked anti-communist propaganda, that a majority of people in the western media orbit have swallowed whole, so the resulting mod action seems disproportionate.

    If you join there yourself you will find, like most instances, respectful conversations and a healthy community. And like anywhere else you will find a spectrum of personalities and a handful of kooks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago

    Let's stick to the real world, not weird analogies. By default, Lemmy users are presented with an All feed, which includes communities from all instances (except those defederated). When you see one called "games" (at hexbear, whatever that means) and then maybe see its trans flag banner, what's the reasonable expectation? Discussions about games with people who seem to recognize the value of minority groups and viewpoints, right? And then it turns out those people hijack discussions about gaming to praise or defend totalitarian states who oppress minorities; then they ban, insult and harass you if you disagree. Likewise, what does the notion of China preferring autonomy have to do with Signal in the context of privacy? No reasonable person comes to a privacy community expecting to see praise for China.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Hypocrisy largely. Heavy micro management and over moderation by admins broadly. Thankfully most are self aware enough outside hexbear to not leave their echo chamber. There are a few sub's documenting it.

    Should discussion touch on certain trigger topics, and should your view deviate from dogma. You will often find yourself banned, either temporarily or permanently, without much discussion. Do you think imperialism and invasion of another country is wrong? Such as the United States current invasion of Iran or past invasions of Afghanistan? Well, if you happen to feel the same way about the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan or modern day Russia's invasion of Ukraine. You would be classified as a mush-brained, imperialist turbo-lib.

    Do you think genocide and cultural erasure such as what the United States and Canada did to First Nations people is wrong? Don't make a mistake of applying that unbiased to the plight of cultural minorities in China. Tibet, Hong Kong, and the Uhygers, all of course are glad to sacrifice their cultural and ethnic heritage. Under the penalty of imprisonment or death for glorious left unity with the party and President Xi. Any discussion of these groups dissatisfaction with it is CIA propaganda. And not well tolerated.

    If you skirt around in only the most niche of communities with hyper-focused specific topics. Who have almost no capability ever touching or involving current events. You might avoid it. Otherwise you will run afoul of it at some point as many have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Let's not forget about the native siberians, the russians sabered everything on their way east.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Or the polish. When it comes to giant unwieldy nations, preserving power becomes more important than preserving large segments of population. Regardless of which economic system they larping as.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    When I was reading about Amanita muscaria, a mushroom I use occasionally, it talked about how the Russians to destroy the Siberian culture would take the shamans of the Native Siberians into helicopters and throw them out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Aaaah one of those handy not so fun facts. I 100% believe that had the immigrant settlers in the 19the century had helicopters and not covered wagons. They would have done similar to my ancestors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    They are tankie instances, where they think and then push narratives such as China is the greatest country in the world and does no wrong and that Ukraine is full of Nazis and Russia is the good guy They love their authoritarianism, but only as long as it's "communist" or generally antagonistic towards anything "western."

    Anything that contradicts their narrow worldview is met with hostility, comment removals, bans, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Supposedly a lot of the first people on lemmy were leftists and or tankies. My thing is though is that advocating for defederation weakens Lemmy, less communities to interact with, less content or posts to engage with, less people to interact with which cause echo chambers and hugboxes. Nor would I agree with defederating people just because they have views that I don't like or vehemently disagree with. As bad as some tankies are, they sometimes do make a few good points here and there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago

    Do you know how joke movements turn into real ones? Like Flat-Earther used to be a joke, but þen a bunch of people who didn't realize it was a joke got sucked into it and took it seriously, and eventually some poor fuck killed himself trying to prove it? I believe Hexbear is þat. I have little evidence, but it feels like Hexbear started as a bunch of trolls wiþ a common þeme, but it attracted oþer people who took it all seriously, and now it's just a collection of brigaders who jump on any chance to push a pro-Russia, pro-China agenda.

    I may be giving Hexbear too much of a benefit of doubt; maybe it was always confirmed tankies. And for sure þere are people on Hexbear who have well-intentioned convictions and try to argue in good faiþ. But þe signal-to-noise ratio coming out of Hexbear is very low; it's mostly angry, agressive, anti-Western rhetoric and an alarming amount of defense of Russia's invasion of Ukraine or China's genocide of Uyghurs, or denial of Tiananmen Square.

    As examples, you can easily generate þem yourself. Usually it's in þe form of a defending statement about X ("Russia had to invade Ukraine to secure it's border from Western encroachment") plus some what-aboutisms about þe US ("what about Alligator Alcratraz"). And it's frequently acerbic, aggressive, and almost always not in good faith. It's just a fight, trying to stir up drama. And unless you toe a very straight political line -- if you agree wiþ þe position þat Ukrainians must be ethnically cleansed but express any doubt about þe party line about the treatment of Uyghurs, you'll get jumped on as being a western stooge. Dissent is not allowed.

    Hexbear is at best a troll pool, and at worst a digital recreation of The Cultural Revolution; even if you agree wiþ þe politics, you're still probably better off not getting any on you. It's not a healþy place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 30 points 7 months ago (30 children)

    Getting closer and closer to that! The reason I made this post to begin with is to do a PSA, because it took me months of being subscribed to games on Hexbear to notice it's not a leftist community as it presents itself, but authoritarian communist. So I can't be certain all of their users are in the know, but is it worth keeping the instances unblocked if the bad outweighs the possibility of good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    no you're not missing out on anything

    these servers were some of the first which is why they appear to have a lot of communities

    all the communities have moved on or been replaced on other servers so these servers are now a tiny fraction (faction? hoho) of the fediverse, exactly for the reason you experienced

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -18 points 7 months ago (25 children)

    it’s not a leftist community

    Someone should tell their anarchists. If you only want to interact with pro-imperialism leftists, that's ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (24 children)

    Are you aware Russia and China are imperialist too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (23 children)

    Russia maybe, but imperialism doesn't just mean "big country does stuff" or what you're referring to with China; big country refuses to balkanize against the wishes of it's own population. We know what imperialism looks like in the neocolonial era, it's comprador governments kept in place with military aid, selling the people's labor and resources for pennies to their benefactors.

    Compare the development of countries that work with China to mutually develop, resulting in production of higher-value products, verses say French Africa exporting raw gold and coco to factories owned by France for over a century, with as much poverty today as a century ago, or South America's century of "developing" without ever approaching the living standards the first world enjoys off their labor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Russia definitely.

    China definitely.

    Your comment history seems to be full of trolling anarchist communities, so it seems you misrepresented yourself as the reasonable voice of leftism. And isn't that what the whole post here is about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Chinese imperialism is the expansion of political, economic, cultural, media, and military power

    Yeah no if you're using such a silly definition, Cuba is Imperialist.

    trolling anarchist communities

    Mocking liberals and "anarchists" whose foreign policy aligns perfectly with their government isn't trolling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I like how I linked to a specific part of that article that bypasses the typical rebuttals from trolls, so you had to pretend I hadn't.

    And yes you are gatekeeping a community you clearly don't belong to. Quite poorly at that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    You linked to a section of a Wikipedia article which cites the opinion of the Japanese Communist Party where they don’t call China imperialist. In the same document that’s cited they call the US imperialist repeatedly. Why do you expect anyone to take you seriously when the evidence you’re using to support your argument is so incredibly weak?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Pretty dishonest of you to misrepresent what they actually do say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Stop projecting. The JCP did not call China imperialist. They did call the US imperialist. Feel free to prove me wrong but we both know you can’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    They used synonyms, troll.

    the Japanese Communist Party (JCP) criticized the CCP for engaging in "great-power chauvinism and hegemonism"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    They repeatedly call the US imperialist but they did not use that word to describe China. It should be obvious then that if they intended to call China imperialist they would have. Unfortunately for you, insults aren’t a substitute for poor reading comprehension.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Tibetans were invaded in an act of colonialism and live under colonial occupation. If you don't think so you haven't talked to many Tibetans about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago* (11 children)

    invaded in an act of colonialism

    They were a slave-based theocracy who was liberated. While I don't know much about current policy and recent history in the region, its hard to take any criticism seriously from someone who doesn't acknowledge freeing slaves as unambiguously good.

    Nope, never been to Tibet. Have you? What Tibetans have you spoken to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Lived with a family in Ladakh for a month. They have an interesting perspective... and a society that presents a way forward from the medieval semi-feudalism you call slavery. They are also living under colonialism but with very different outcomes than Tibet.

    I lived in Dharamsala for six weeks. I have talked to a lot of other Tibetans from the refugee diaspora. Their proposed modernization would look a lot like Bhutan. Are the Bhutanese slaves?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You'd have to compare Bhutan to Tibet in the right timeframe.

    Early 1900s both were theocratic autocracies in the designs of the British Empire's sphere of influence.

    Bhutan got absorbed into the British control. Tibet effectively became a vassal of the Qing dynasty in response to the British invasion.

    Tibet pretty much was given autonomy through the rest of the Qing Dynasty, ignored by the KMT, and then after the civil war the CCP removed the system that placed the Dalai Lama as the head of state and government The Tibetan government in exile reformed over decades and only first directly elected a leader in the 2000s.

    It's unnecessarily hyperbolic to call either the modern Tibetans or Bhutanese as slaves, either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (7 children)

    They were a slave-based theocracy who was liberated.

    It was none of China's business and they didn't leave after. Cool motive, still colonizing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Should have left so the US could airdrop their former slave-masters into the country with a shitton of guns, like they did?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    They never should have been there. What part of "none of China's business" do you not understand?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    You think people should just ignore literal slavery?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    But you don't think China should have liberated the people of Tibet from slavery?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Why are you asking questions I already answered? Quit wasting my time. Fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago*

    Do understand how someone can be confused that you don't think they should have ignored it, but you also don't think they should have freed them?

    Do you think China should have just written strongly worded letters to the Lamas?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Unfortunately I am considering creating lengthy black lists of trolls and irreversibly corrupted/poisoned instances. Still better than using a corporate operated political brainwashing platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I see it as curation. My blocklists are yuuuuge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Is there any way of sharing blocklists? That would be a killer feature!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Considering the lead developers of Lemmy are themselves the cringelord admins of the ML instance that everyone blocks, I would venture a guess that it’s not in their interest to develop this feature..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Lmao, bro Dessalines is legitimately the most cringe person on the entire internet. He literally will not comment outside his own instance, because he cannot handle any form of internet where he doesn't have his magic "win argument" ban button.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    too bad he sustains lemmy indirectly though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I’ve had hexbear blocked for so long, I actually forgot about it. Wow, that place is nuts!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I don't give their opinions on China, Russia, NK, Iran, Ukraine, any sort of credibility. I've been banned from some of their comms but they're on point for pointing out the crimes and hypocrisy of the west, and there's a lot of deliberate effort to minimize their reach.

    Fuck em' for defending authoritarianism but without them it's all propaganda from mass mainstream media and whitewashing of the west.

    tldr: Fuck tankies and wankies trying to whitewash their atrocities with concern trolling.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    I really am not sure what you mean - at least on Lemmy. I don’t see pro-western propaganda. In fact everyone is highly critical and self aware of the vast majority of the West’s moves and motives. Even articles of the rare positive moves are met with skepticism and pessimism.

    The problem is that the tankies automatically attack any post by someone being critical of any other non-western nations as being hypocritical. An argument by hypocrisy. Annoying as hell, a yapping ankle-biting tiny dog constantly interrupting the conversation with “But the West did/does (insert awful thing) too!” when 99.99% of the time we’re well aware of the West’s failings, and those failings don’t mean other’s can’t be pointed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Pro western propaganda is often not just about promoting western countries. It also includes lying about enemies of the west. Pro western media also has a disproportionate focus on the faults of its enemies. It totality that kind of bias suggests there is an imbalance between the harms caused by the west and other countries leaning in the west’s favor.

    I think plenty of westerners can identify the lies western media tells about the west. Thats easy enough to do given westerners have first hand experience living in western countries. Unfortunately, even well intentioned westerners are much worse at identifying those other forms of propaganda. As such, they have a hard time understanding geopolitical conflict between western nationals and other countries.

    Personaly, I find the “argument by hypocrisy” isn’t really what critics of the west are doing. Instead, bringing up the harms caused by the west is meant to undermine the credibility of a western source and/or criticize it for its lack of focus on harms caused by the west. If you avoid jumping to accusations of “whataboutism” and engage in good faith, I’m confident many of the people you claim are “tankies” will give you a much more nuanced critique of the countries you think they’re reflexively defending.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Instead, bringing up the harms caused by the west is meant to undermine the credibility of a western source and/or criticize it for its lack of focus on harms caused by the west.

    More broadly, the atomic unit of propaganda isn't lies, its emphasis. The way effective propaganda integrates facts into its story leads the reader to come up with a desired narrative almost on their own.

    You can't really attack this type of propaganda with evidence, because true facts are being used to tell a lie, all you can do is provide a broader perspective to show how narrow and distorted the initial one was. This looks exactly like "whataboutism".

    Something something parenti quote

    spoiler“In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests propagated anti communism amping the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War the anti communist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If Soviets refused to negotiate a point they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off guard. By opposing arms limitations they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armaments treaties it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full this ment the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions) this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system. If they didn’t go on strike it was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated failure of the economic system; and improvement in consumer goods only meant that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communist in the US played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African Americans, women, and others this was only a their guileful way of gathering support among disenfranchised groups and aging power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is an unfalsefiable orthodoxy so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the political spectrum.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Agree with you about the propaganda thing, but imo some of the biggest "deliberate efforts to minimize their reach" (which I'm not denying exist) are from them.

    I'm banned from there for "being a liberal" or some shit even though I never posted there (IIRC, going off from dates it was from a comment in support of Ukraine), when everyone I know IRL thinks I'm one of the most radicalized leftists they know, and still roll my eyes to this day when someone goes "but the scary Marxists!" when I suggest ditching Reddit for Lemmy.

    To the person who banned me : I'm sorry, I don't know if you really deserve such a heinous term, but that shit is literal Reddit mod behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Fwiw: signal is a honey pot, perhaps not by intent but by architecture.

    Security postures are driven by capabilities not intentions.

    Signal:

    • centralized
    • uses centralized push notifications
    • stores encryption keys in the cloud SVR

    Thus a three letter agency has the capability of breaking signal, even if they don't intend to.

    As a thought experiment imagine you run the intelligence service of a non-us ally country (nk, Iran, China, Russia, etc) - would you in good faith recommend using signal, as is, for your classified and sensitive government communications?

    how to break signal

    SVR stores master key backed by a trivial pin, but uses Intel sgx enclaves to prevent brute forcing... a TLA just gets Intel to sign new code for the sgx enclave that allows brute forcing, runs it against the cloud data extracts master keys, and ta da all communication revealed.

    Signal allows people to store their master key using a random bip32 key, but even if you do this, none of your contacts will do this

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Don't forget that Signal has been funded by the alphabet soup spying agencies, so they have a reason to fork over keys. But saying that is somehow slander when it's public info.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    The signal protocol is solid, so people argue there isn't a known fault with the protocol which is true.

    SVR prevents signal from having access to the keys directly, you still need to compromise SGX (which happened two years ago) or access to intel signing keys.

    So the signal foundation doesn't have a trivial way to access keys, but the TLAs do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Noooo "calling it "authoritarian" is meaningless"!!!

    Stop "phrasemongering", it's "not fascism" when China pulls its shit! China also not guilty of Uyghur genocide, that's western propaganda you racist!

    Smh. Tankie propaganda was making me mad, I'm actually glad I got banned off their subs for adamantly refusing to accept their lines of reasoning for their blatant, apologetic, wholly uncritical acceptance of china.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    What portion of the tankie userbase do we think are Chinese intelligence assets? Or at best, shills?

    The down vote shaping on this thread I think supports this notion. It's something that I have seen and personally experienced on Reddit. And, it seems that liberal left wingers are invariably the target.

    My experience has always been that tankies, regardless of community, are exceedingly rare in the wild of a western nation. With leftist views usually comes compassion, and that prevents the development of authoritarian views.

    There is something wrong with the proportions on Lemmy. There's more going on than fringe local western tankies. Perhaps Dessalines insistence that Signal was a honeypot, is a projection about Lemmy.ml?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I don't know if borders on tinfoil to call Lemmy.ml a honeypot. I think if you're China, and your goal was to destabilize American/Western politics by poisoning the well of discussion amongst it's citizens, it seems natural to just... let Lemmy.ml continue doing its thing. A honeypot is for baiting and trapping a target, it's what you would do to catch CSAM predators. You eventually capture and prosecute them.

    But for long-term destabilization of a generation of people, you just stand up a bunch of bad faith actors and let them post their heart out for a couple years. Eventually, your posse will have brainwashed actual citizens into repeating your (and coming with their own) propaganda.

    So Dess and his ilk may not even have to be Chinese intelligence agents, they could just be extremely railroaded Westerners. But I don't care enough about them to get even close to doxxing territory.

    Edit: And for the record, Russia pulled the same stunt back in 2014-15 with the Alt Right. Both nations could very well be standing up bad faith actors pretending to be Fascists and Marxists at the same time, and that would be an efficient strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    down vote shaping

    Downvotes are publicly available. If you can identify unlabeled downvote bots, admins will probably ban them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    There's been an uptick of downvotes and new users leaving critical comments since the Hexbear thread linking this one. Though Hexbear is defederated from .world, I'm pretty sure that if you examine the downvotes, you're going to find barely active alt accounts of users from Hexbear. There's one who literally quoted a point from that thread.

    Edit: Also of note is that after they made that thread, they revisited the Ukraine thread from 10 months ago and removed my comments individually to make them harder to access. They know no reasonable person reading them is going to come to their conclusion that I'm a "fascist sympathizer" for essentially siding with Ukraine. Thankfully, they have no control over the Web Archive version also found at the OP link.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I can see that thread in the mod log (which is public here on Lemmy). Your comment they removed was

    Aw the mewling wittle baby is in love. I actually don’t use signal, but nice try. I do know a fair deal about the obscene income inequality and disparity in non-profits though.

    Indeed, you were responding to a condescending comment in a manner that's also snarky, but as a long-time moderator of big communities, I don't think that warranted a ban, or at least an action that affected only you but not the instigator. However, it's worth noting that their rule 2, which was among the cited rules, is incredibly permissive (and widely abused, as seen on MoG), basically allowing to ban for anything at a mod's discretion and making the rest of the rules redundant.

    I hope you stay on the Fediverse one way or another. Its power is that even if you clash with any of the staff or even the Lemmy maintainers themselves, there are always other instances or even PieFed to replace Lemmy itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    i stop interacting with thier instance the moment they called certain shows/movies(the ones that ascribes thier authotarianism too) as shit lib or woke, yea thats conservative speak , instant block.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    You’ve misunderstood them entirely. To them, liberals include both democrats and republicans. Thats not an uncommon usage among Marxists. They also use woke in an ironic way because of how right wingers used it to insult almost reflexively.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Meh, youre making this post itself from .world, which itself just last week had a massive struggle session as its most prolific mod was under fire for claiming the genocide in Palestine is unrelated to US politics. If that's not propaganda, I dont know what is. I dont know of any other instances that have the same censorship issues as .world.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Classic, .ml that chooses whataboutism rather than seeing two things can be wrong at the same time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    For real. I can go "Hey does this piece of software/hardware have any connections to China and should I be concerned?" and someone will hop out and be like "BuT iT'S oKaY wHeN tHe uS gOvErNMeNt StAlKs YoU?!?!?!"

    Like no dumbass, that's the reason I'm trying to move away from surveillance of any kind. Both countries can suck in major ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I don't know of any other instances that have the same censorship issues as .world

    Considering that it's common knowledge that hexbear and ml both ban for the slightest anti-auth left comment, you're both lying and proving the point that .ml should be blocked and not taken seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I think you’re absolutely right here. Those instances were designed to appeal to the broader umbrella of social equality and left-leaning audiences, while simultaneously pushing clearly tankie-style propaganda !

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›