Posts like that are the ones that keep me here. There are some really dope people here who want to help and inform other people.

What's sad is often content like this gets labeled as 'evil' and then brigaded by users who perceive it as a threat to furthering their political agenda, because anyone who isn't on their side, or is remotely nice to anyone on the 'other' sides, is evil.

By lemmy.ml logic, if I help my elderly Trump-voting neighbor take out his trash, I'm also a Trump supporter. Apparently I'm if I was a 'good person' who was really anit-Trump, I'd beat him or slash his tires or something.

Yeah, that's why I mentioned votes

I think that it'd make sense to be able to maybe do something like build a score aggregated from multiple lists or something.

Another thing I've mentioned in the past is using this as a mechanism for tagging. The NSFW flag was a hack that Reddit put in because some people wanted to browse Reddit at work and some people wanted to post stuff that wouldn't be considered acceptable in most work contexts. There are many, many different categories that someone might want to "tag" things on. Some people are fine with nudity. Some people are fine with gore. Some people are fine with suggestive content. Some people object to specific items in the above. I think that it will never be the case that everyone will manually tag their own content in all the same areas, but it could be the case that someone could create "lists" that one could subscribe to that could permit that sort of tagging; same mechanism.

What's sus about Blahaj Zone? I've always found them to be nice people.

I tend to not block instances FWIW. I have blocked several communities and found that it works pretty well. For now, browsing /all in lemmy is my preferred view because we just don’t have that many people to keep content coming in the communities I have subscribed to. Plus, it’s more fun to see the variety. Lemmy is small enough still where it’s easier to “opt-out” than there is a need to “opt-in” to limit the noise.

hey, just so you know blahaj.zone is not a tankie instance, it's an instance aimed at protecting oppressed minorities (it hosts a women-only community, protects LGBT+ users from bigotry, etc.).

I think technically the instance doesn't take sides in terms of political ideology and is thus not a "political instance", but the top community on blahaj.zone is vehemently anti-tankie, so I would say they're the opposite of the people you're worried about

You can read more about blahaj.zone's intentions as a space here:

https://lemmyverse.link/lem.lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/14736607

First and foremost, blahaj zone lemmy exists to give a space for queer folk to exist, with their needs explicitly protected as the highest priority, and with a particular focus on the needs of gender diverse folk. Most lemmy instances are not run by trans folk, and whilst many are still inclusive, they don’t always prioritise our needs. Others barely consider trans folk, and react only to the most blatant of bigotry.

We are not a political instance, however political communities have a space here, as does any community that is actively protective of the needs of queer and gender diverse folk. Given the impact of politics on gender diverse folk, that means lots of dialogue and strong opinions exist, and as long as those opinions are honestly held, and not bigoted or exclusive, people are welcome to have and express those opinions here.

For what it’s worth, I am a member of the Greens Party in Australia. I have no time for the middle ground politics of the Australian Labor party, let alone the right wing beliefs of the Australian Liberal party. Yet a community of queer Labor Party aligned folk would fit on blahaj lemmy, because the parties ideologies, are not explicitly anti queer. A community aligned with the Australian Liberal party likely would not have a place here, unless the goal of the community was to work at actively challenging the anti queer policies of the party.

basically you'll only have issues with blahaj.zone if you're transphobic, homophobic, etc.

Can do it through apps too.

ML is definitely everyone's first and fav instance to block, and it sounds like it's time for you too. A lot of the dumb shit will cut down very quickly just by getting rid of that one.

I agree that blocking these instances will dramatically improve your experience.

Could it be cause you say shit like this?

https://piefed.social/comment/10584215

I joined about two years ago, and to get the most content I have kept browsing All, however that is annoying when some new guy decide to set up a new NSFW community outside of the NSFW branded instances and I have to block them individually.

When lemmynsfw existed most people went there to post, but some either didn't like the instance or didn't know about it and posted on generic instances.

I don't want to turn on NSFW filtering in general, as it is used in memes and jokes, but I don't want porn on my main account, that is what my alt is used for.

I'm a big fan of the subscribed only home feed. I see so much less hateful things since I started doing that.

today but its been this fall the party has taken over time. go look what teddy roosevelt did and this was not one of those congress just happened to do it during his presidency. He was fully behind and putting forth a lot of it. This is what they mean by democrats being right of republicans. you go back far enough and republicans actually had some stuff besides lower regulation and taxes on the wealthy. they actually were behind tax increases because of the pay as you go thing. Really nixon sorta started the fall even though he did some stuff that was do to pressure on him along with stuff he wanted to do but abandoned or reversed course due to pressure. Then you get reagan who through out a lot of thier financial stuff and that was pretty much the lower regulation and lower taxes on weatlhy were all that mattered. They still gave some lip service to things like moral stances or trump to get the religious folks on their side but even that is going out the window. its crazy when you look at the changes in the party from roosevelt to nixon to reagan to bush jr. to trump.

Friedrich Engels once said: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty European civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly, without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means. This world war is a regression into barbarism. The triumph of imperialism leads to the annihilation of civilization. At first, this happens sporadically for the duration of a modern war, but then when the period of unlimited wars begins it progresses toward its inevitable consequences. Today, we face the choice exactly as Friedrich Engels foresaw it a generation ago: either the triumph of imperialism and the collapse of all civilization as in ancient Rome, depopulation, desolation, degeneration – a great cemetery. Or the victory of socialism, that means the conscious active struggle of the international proletariat against imperialism and its method of war. This is a dilemma of world history, an either/or; the scales are wavering before the decision of the class-conscious proletariat. The future of civilization and humanity depends on whether or not the proletariat resolves manfully to throw its revolutionary broadsword into the scales. In this war imperialism has won. Its bloody sword of genocide has brutally tilted the scale toward the abyss of misery. The only compensation for all the misery and all the shame would be if we learn from the war how the proletariat can seize mastery of its own destiny and escape the role of the lackey to the ruling classes.

This was Rosa Luxemburg in 1915. The regression into barbarism was brutal. Lets not lose sight of "the only compensation for the misery and all the shame"