Dementia, Alzheimer's, Atherosclerosis.
Aging in general.
post
replies:
dementia
Heart disease. Beats other death causes hands down.
Curing the side effects of the anti-cancer pill.
Cancer is only the biggest thing because it can hit anyone, including rich people.
Not because it's actually what is the biggest threat.
replies:
Aging, maybe. Once cancer's gone, why not?
replies:
Hair loss.
Smol pp
replies:
I bet the next thing we'd be fighting for is the ability for an average person to afford that pill. I mean ... Insurance companies aren't in the business of healing people after all. Why can't you think about the shareholders!!!
They would focus on monetizing that pill and wringing every last dollar out of it.
Hiding the pills existence.
replies:
The common cold
Cardiovascular disease
Get rid of tuberculosis once and for all. It’s still the world’s deadliest infectious disease.
You don’t need to eradicate if you achieve super gene editing capabilities.
Along with all the other good answers I’ll add ALS. Really terrible disease that can accelerate quickly.
We’d be focused on making sure that all of your assets get transferred to blackrock before you could access that pill
Some years ago, Dr. David Williams ( whose website is now gone ), had a paper-newsletter.
A friend of his had cancer, & was in an experimental-drug-trial.
He was the ONLY survivor of that trial.
In the closeout interview, he told them he'd also been taking fenbendazole.
Oh, well they already knew about that, so his surviving wasn't surprising, then.
Dr. David Williams was LIVID.
Oncologists KNEW a way to defeat cancer, & they SAT ON IT??
The only site with information on it, nowadays, seems to be:
I'm a brain-decimation survivor, & have been gaslit by doctors all my life ( dad was a medical-researcher & doctor: he taught me to think, but medical-culture's narcissistic, & I went no-contact with both parents, for years-at-a-time, to protect my life from their prejudice against their inferior's having any validity )
IF I had cancer, I'd be taking that, if I could.
The industry won't EVER tolerate diminishing of its establishment, profits, or authority.
The question is falsely-based, thereby.
Sorry to be cynical about it.
Go read the book "Doctored", or the book "Money-Driven Medicine", or 1 of many many other books on the conflict-of-interest between medical-industry & what it supposedly is for.
Conflict-of-interest is THE root of corruption.
Until the reward & the goal are congruent, corruption's inescapable.
_ /\ _ o
replies:
all 32 comments