Samsung didn't offer an explanation for its decision, but it's not exactly a surprise.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 7 months ago

Oh... Samsung, the new Google

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago
    [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Well the front fell off

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    It's the only foldable that actually makes sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    How does it make sense? They call it a Tri Fold but it only folds twice, not three times.

    It's a phone and a tablet in one but costs more than the two of them together, even if the tablets are an iPhone Pro and an iPad Pro.

    Make it make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    I suspect they broke too often. First thought was low sales but article says otherwise.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Can they stop a sale if it was not selling?... maybe stop "offering" tehehehehehe

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Did you read the article?

    "Samsung didn’t offer a rationale for this decision, but poor sales probably isn’t it. While the phone retailed for a whopping $2,899, Samsung was selling every unit it could produce. The company’s website actually teased restocks until recently, and desperate buyers were paying above MSRP on the second-hand market."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago