all 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This keeps getting buried by the algos, but I see this requirement as a real problem. Unreliable tech that stops your car if it thinks you're not driving right... and already current implementations have lots of false positive actions. Yeah, nope. This won't go well.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Imagine the car doing a full stop on the highway because of a bug splatter on the camera. False positives might even be lethal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    or showing fatigue

    Oh, you mean like literally every morning as I'm leaving for work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    I'm about to say something that can be read as me supporting this shit, and I do not.

    However.

    Driving fatigued is about as unsafe as driving drunk. Assuming you are actually fatigued.

    There was a time in the past when we allowed people to actively drink and drive.

    I think - for the most part - not allowing that was a good idea.

    IN THEORY preventing people from driving fatigued is not a bad idea.

    IN PRACTICE we all know it won't be as simple as that.

    But the basic idea itself is… not all bad. It's a pity we know it'll go to shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Well we're going to have to figure out something for all the people who take a couple hours to get their brains into gear in the morning if you want to stop that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Yes indeed. I don't think it'll be easy at all. Trying to stop intoxicated driving is difficult enough, and that's usually driving that happens "after hours". So this would be ten times more difficult.

    I suppose, in theory, most of the time forcing the use of some sort of alternate transportation would work, although we'd have to figure out how to make it cheaper. We often drink close to where we live, and work far from where we live.

    If it was up to me, I'd delay this further and do more research and get more smart people coming up with ideas on how to solve these problems, because it would be worth trying to fix. But then again, there are so many problems we should be tackling, this is a relatively minor one.....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Fuck off with your nuanced take. We're here to be irrational and fire off unwarranted gripes!

    I want my car to make hot coffee and pour it in my lap every morning on the way to work!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    But you can just go to McDonald's for that. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    But can I trigger it via my home doorbell using a Home Assistant integration?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Now if this piece of regulation passes what’s preventing your government from allowing full blown rollout of ai based fines system using camera networks for example ? This crap lowers the bar in terms of human validation a whole lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    This is the worst timeline. Tech could have set us all free; instead its returning us to feudalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I get nauseated reading about these developments

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    lol like when I rented a Penske truck that had lane departure that kept malfunctioning.

    Kept thinking I was on the road besides the freeway and slamming the brakes because I was over the speed limit.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

    Wikipedia says roughly 42k people died of car related injuries in 2022.

    So, the government is promising that this brand new technology that has not had any field testing whatsoever is going to reduce car related deaths by 23%?

    They're lucky theres no way to sue over a broken promise.

    Here's a great way to reduce car deaths to near 0%

    functional public transit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    It's not about reducing road fatalities.

    It's about surveilling political enemies.

    It'll have sudden false positives the moment you talk about how bad the government is. It'll suddenly appear in counter-terrorism surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    they'll end up playing a loud advert if you look sleepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    God we're so fucked...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    Hoping it can be defeated with a strategically placed piece of tape

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Infrared sensors would be defeat-able. Integrated telemetry stuff (speed, driving habits, aggressiveness) no so much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Depends on if they're tied to the CAN bus. If so, all sensors can be spoofed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Over the sensors…

    There’s zero chance that if these sensors fail they disable the car. You wouldn’t be able to bring them in for work. So covering the sensors should easily work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Think they'd just tell you to tow the car? Tesla vehicles do this, and right now they are leading the auto industry in making cars worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    And yet you can disable the annoying slow moving beeping in any normal EV without it shutting down the car.

    Car manufacturers will do the minimum possible to not piss off customers. They’re not going to deal with all the craziness of what happens if the sensors stop working when driving, and how it would slow down the car, etc. they’re just gonna make it fail safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    real REASON, is surveilling the actual passenger itself for any "Radical elements"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Joke's on them, I can't afford a new car

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So used car prices will be going up, then.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Ofcourse this would happen. Every EV car has a sort-kind-of-black-box and a gps. So every car knows exactely what speed it is allowed to drive on the roads. In the future - when you have an accident - the insurrance company can investigate the black box of your car and see immediately what speed you were driving on that particular gps-point. With your mobile phone connected to the car, it can also see immediately who was driving the car, etc... It was written in the stars many years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    My mom was using a tracker app to record her drives on her phone and when skiing. It recorded dozens of drives up and down the mountain.

    You can delete them or say it’s not you driving, but there were weeks of them and she easily could have missed some.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Always a good time to pick up biking. And warm clothes for cold nights.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    And this is just one of three reasons why I will never own a vehicle manufactured after 2006.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Everyone thinks they're a great driver... but I know that even when I'm exhausted, I will signal 90% more turns than these clowns I'm forced to share the road with.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Joke's on them, I can't afford a new car

    (Wouldn't buy one if I could)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    mandatory in the banana republic shithole.
    So who cares?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    This technology will just prove what we already know. Most people shouldn't be driving. Bring on the trains and buses!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Nooo, you're a conspiracy theorist and a tinfoil hat that needs to touch grass.

    hope more people realize this BS

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    I just point them to this great movie that programmed the masses for this.
    Ignorance is their choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    I wouldn't even call them ignorant, because that implies innocence or naïvety; this is actively hostile

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (8 children)

    Oh, they get hostile against you telling them this is part of their fascist plans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    Yeah, but I also meant that actively trying to shut down people who point out this is surveillance is hostile to the message that it is fascism (it's not just a "idk").

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (6 children)

    That's your instance as well. Tis why I am ani.social, and anarchist instances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    Is that similar to the moderation on .ml? I was recently banned from memes.ml because I was unapologetically criticizing china and they didn't seem to like it.

    In other words, do anarchist instances suffer from the same moderation prejudices of communist-centric ones?

    If they do, there wouldn't be much of a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Marxist Lennists instances differ from anarchist ones in one key aspect: freedom of association. The fact they banned you for anti Xi rhetorics instead of engage your appropriate criticism in earnest is why ML instance do not praxis intersection. Only if it becomes convenient to ally, they’ll support you until you're no longer necessary:
    Stalin disassociation in history

    do anarchist instances suffer from the same moderation prejudices of communist-centric ones?

    In short no, because we comprehend folks come from many different backgrounds and biases, and as anarchists, we try to intersect to break those biases down. We outreach instead of silence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Appreciate the response.

    It's funny, I just saw a meme where anarchists were portrayed as being the ones to ditch communists after common goals have been achieved.

    What community/instance would you recommend?

    Do you mind getting into a discussion around what anarchism is/etc more?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Show me that meme! It's historically always the inverse!

    community/instance would you recommend?

    So far, the one I am on, *.dbzer0.com, anarchist.nexus, quokk.au etc.. I can’t afford to make mine yet due to the dwindling Yen.

    Do you mind getting into a discussion around what anarchism is/etc more?

    Always! We co-read weekly new topics!

    I am currently banned on dbzero due to a huge misunderstanding, I am going to wait on my appeal to go through the week. So far Jorunn (she/her) @piefed.blahaj.zone has nayed my motion to apologize, and thus double-down on misinterpreting my satire for bigotry.

    But you can DM me for my personal views as well. My wife is a regular in the jabber chat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 25 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 39 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Jesus fucking christ. Could the fascist corporate dictatorship be any more obvious?

    Once everyone's okay with 24/7 surveillance in public, they'll be installing cameras in every room of your home to ensure "private" compliance.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    Totally. Next they are going to issue devices to everyone that track their every step. You know, small devices, small enough to fit into a pocket. The devices might even be equipped with a microphone and a camera and they'll have a constant wireless spy link that allows the spy network provider to track the location of each of these devices completely irrespective of what software is or is not running on the device.

    And because it's a corporate dictatorship, they might even make people pay for these devices themselves.


    Tbh, I totally don't get why people are so panicky about car tracking when everyone voluntarily owns a smartphone that allows much more in-detail position tracking than car tracking ever could.

    Don't you all know that network providers can and do track any mobile device (including dumb phones and phones with custom ROMs) in their networks? They physically have to do that to place your phone into the right network cell, but they then save your location. And if you live in the USA, go read your mobile network contract. Chances are very high that you gave your network provider permission to sell your location to whoever pays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Yes I know but I can turn my phone off or leave it at home. Or bring a burner. If I'm driving somewhere I can't turn my car off or leave it at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    The burner is easily correlateable to you. If you don't want to be tracked with your car, you can also use an oldtimer or take a bus.

    But you know as well as me that you won't turn your phone off or leave it at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    I do often leave the house without a phone. Though I wish I could still get a pager for the most important information like my burglar alarm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    A pager would also be constantly tracked via network triangulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    No it wouldn't. Pagers as I used them received the same signals all through the country. The network didn't even know if the pager was on or not. It was purely one way. It supported numeric (and tone) and even text messages (not encrypted but this day and age that would be possible). You could be out of coverage but the pager would warn you and due to the low frequency and low bandwidth coverage indoors was excellent. The only time I received an out of range message was when I visited a cave system.

    Transmitting pagers with sending and receipt confirmation did also exist at one time but that's not the ones I mean. Maybe a network will emerge again. It doesn't actually cost a lot.

    I'm kinda hoping more people will want their pagers back for precisely this reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    No, pagers do bi-directional communication just like phones. Even the old pagers from the 70s used bi-directional communication. They didn't just broadcast over the whole continent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    No they didn't. Most pagers were receive-only. In my country two way paging networks weren't even deployed. This is why they were allowed in hospitals and mobile phones weren't, they didn't transmit. Look up the POCSAG and ERMES protocols for example. All unidirectional. They didn't work on the whole continent, just per country.

    Perhaps in the US it was different, I've never been there. But there they sure were unidirectional. Even the text ones. I still have several of them and I've run my own transmitter for them on the amateur band.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Since these bunch of assholes violate my privacy, I should be okay with multiple groups of assholes doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    You already have not a bunch but a horde of people watching every move you make on your phone, and not only are you ok with it, you even post your opinions on social media, which means you are totally fine with it.

    Which makes the protest against a small bit more surveilance pretty hypocritical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (5 children)

    I have taken time-consuming measures to strengthen security on my phone and to degoogle and ditch big tech. It's actually hard to do. I'm not in an area with people who stimulate me in conversation so Lemmy is good for me.

    It's all I can do to minimize this shit on my phone. I've spent a lot doing it. I can't fight both mobile providers and auto companies too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Does your phone connect to mobile network? If so, your network provider knows your location at all times, because they need to triangulate your position via the network to make sure your phone ends up in the right cell. And yes, they do save your location history, and if you are in a country like the US, you gave them the rights to sell that data when you signed your phone plan.

    Do you use SMS messages? They are unencrypted and the contents are saved too.

    Do you use DNS? Yeah, also unencrypted, and yeah, also that is saved and tracked, no matter which DNS server you configured.

    All of this is way more critical information about you than the car tracking whether you are awake or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    Ford has patent for tech to listen to your conversations. The inside of your car has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's what I'm saying. You are already surveiled 100% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    Use a bicycle and be free.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    And yet ultra-moron turbofascists will point to public transit and bikeable neighborhoods as “digital prisons”.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    when I was 16 I knew I didn't want to drive one day. didn't end up saving for a car like all my classmates and friends. now look who's laughing, not them because the car will think they're drunk if they do.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    When I grew up a car was something everyone basically needed to have. Basically you were a nobody without a driving license.

    Even still in my home country it's like that. And I'm not from America, it's an EU country with decent public transport. But cars are glorified.

    It's pretty ridiculous. Not having one I save so much money, so much stress driving, so much hassle.

  • source
  • parent
  • 5 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Don’t buy those foreign-made EVs cause the big bad boogeymen China and Russia are gonna scoop up all your freedom data.

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    Meanwhile, the simplest switch is ignored: when you turn on your windshield wipers while not in Park or your emergency brake is not engaged, your headlights should come on as well. Such an easy piece of legislation, and nowhere near as expensive for consumers as this BS will be.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    It'll be interesting to learn about defeating this tech. Also, the used car market is going to go nuts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments