The way the rules are being enforced as well as who is enforcing the rules are just as important as the rules themselves IMO, if any of the above 3 change it should be made aware to the users. In this case idk if it would even be condemnation, considering she doesn't seem to mind being a tankie at all.

Yea I said it's a statistical guess... it's the very first sentence I wrote...

Yea it's a statistical guess. The statistics are weighted in a certain direction for me seeing how many times this person seems to be caught up in the same accusation and all of his profile link websites looking... the way it does. But of course it could just be that he happens to write a lot like how AI would generate text.

I don't think @eicker put all that much thought into that comment lol

Nintendo EPD division (Super Mario Odyssey, Breath of the Wild, Splatoon) can be traced back to like the 80s.

i question if the author even has open source projects.

Yeah you can see for yourself here: https://tty.fail/mrus

I mean it would be weird if he talked about migrating his projects off of codeberg if he didn't have any projects to migrate.

Fair enough man, I don't think I could resolve your internal contradictions either.

So in your mind, they are charging money for these things, but they do not intend to make money from these things.

It's different, but it doesn't make one coercion and one not coercion, if, again, going back to the original point, the goal is to get the consumers' money. Not my goal. The goal of the creator of these works. These works are intended for commercial sale. The base assumption is that the creator of these works intend, and are driven to, get the consumer's money. Or is that the part you are having trouble understanding?

You are objecting when you are disengaging from these works, are you not? Unless, going back to a previous question, you are the type to disengage with works you are completely satisfied with?

: to feel distaste for something

This is the definition for object I mean. If you wanted to pull out the dictionary thing again.

If you don't need to get the consumer's money, then why would a boycott be a moral failure? You don't need them. Even in this case there is no practical difference between two cases of propositioning and ignoring.

To force (a person) to do something; drive or constrain

You are driven to meet the other party's demand in both cases, please stay focused. We are talking about selling your work to consumers. The entire goal is to get the consumers' money.