Its Over πŸ˜” (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You want your friend group to have a person with a strong back and a pickup, a white square looking person to talk to cops and bouncers, someone good with computers, someone who can cook, someone who knows where the parties are, and, most importantly, you need the glue person.

Texting and organizing and remembering birthdays and who can't eat gluten and stuff is effort and it's easier for some people than others.

Most people do not like making decisions. Having one person who does the deciding of "we will be friends who stay in touch" is actually really important.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 8 months ago (17 children)

    There are like 3 people in my life who will initiate.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 8 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    No, I'm not. Just because you are mire isolated than me, does not mean I am lucky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    what's an ideal number of people you consider to be sufficient? just curious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

    I don't have one. I find questions like this to be inflammatory.

    Edit: seems a number of people think there is a specific number of freinds you need to be happy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    im not sure why you found it inflammatory as it was a genuine question. regardless, apologies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

    Take a moment to think about that.

    Edit: love when I don't set a standard for something without a standard and people don't use critical thinkg.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    thought about it. I'm still unsure because I was trying to have a conversation and compare numbers, but no need to elaborate I dont want to offend you further

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Comparison of the amount of friends one has is not good. It does not speak to quality of the friendships and can cause further issues for people if they don't "measure up". Genuine curiosity can be inflammatory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I wasnt trying to compare amount of friends. I wanted to know how many friends reach out first that you feel is a sufficient number.

    I think 3 is okay imo, but I figure you'd like more than 3? unsure, hence why I asked

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    How about we don't do numbers of individuals yeah? Bcause again that's a misleading piece of information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    literally said two hours ago how about we not and apologized since you took offense to it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I used to have no one in my life who'd initiate, and was quite happy with that. So from my perspective, 3 does sound like a good number of friends willing to keep you in their circle, but of course we don't know the first thing about you or your circumstances. What is it about those 3 people that makes it feel like their effort isn't enough to stop your feelings of isolation? I assume if it's not about quantity, it's about quality. Am I on the mark, or is it something else you find unsatisfactory?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 108 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I had a friend that moved very far away. We stayed in touch for a while. But he was very busy running a business and raising a special needs toddler with his wife so contact became sporadic. At first I was very understanding and would repeatedly initiate contact that generally, but not always, seemed to well received. After a year or two, I pretty much gave up except for an occasional outreach. I thought that he must be mad at me about something though I couldn't imagine what. After a year or so of minimal contact, I learned that he was suffering from, and hiding, crippling depression. I found out because he hanged himself.

    If you care for the person, put in the fucking effort. You don't know what's going on in their life. I will never forgive myself for not trying harder.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I am sorry for your loss but, you are not responsible for troubles of others. You tried for a year or two. That's a lot. It seems you went further for that friend than most people would. Sometimes, we are not able to help others, no matter how hard we try.

    I know it's not my place to say that but I've seen people I know get hit with the same kind of guilt, slowly but surely tearing at them and I don't really want anyone else to be in this place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago

    Plus, he was living elsewhere, running a business and raising a special needs toddler. Any one of those and it would be reasonable to think that he might just have too much on his plate to maintain the friendship.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    You are right, but we shouldn't compare ourselves to "most people." The bar is WAY too low especially in modern day hypercapitalist, narcissistic, cold, uncaring countries. If we are going to compare ourselves to "most people," at least recognize the context we are in. Most human earth citizens throughout history (and pre-history) are NOT AT ALL the same as the people of 1930s Germany or the late Roman empire, or this 250 year experiment we call the USA. Let's compare yourselves to the good examples of people/tribes of the world, if we must compare ourselves to anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago

    It's the 21st century, if your friend doesn't send a meme without any context at random intervals, are they really your friend?

  • source
  • [+] 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Me: texts every so often, putting thought into each message.

    Friend: responds with β€œthumbs up” or reactions, but no words.

    Me, after the 15th time this happens: ”Well I guess we’re done talking to each other.”

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Just start saying gradually more and more insane stuff.

    "The cutest puppy just ate my sandwich"

    "Omg I just lost my exclamation point"

    "The cutest puppy just ate my face"

    "I just met a leprechaun"

    "The cutest puppy and I just had dinner"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    It's hard not to draw uncharitable conclusions when people you considered friends don't reach out.

    They may be struggling, but that's an explanation not an excuse. The sadness experienced by the person who never gets called, never gets invited, and feels forgotten, is real.

    You think about what they do spend time on. Who they do call. It invites comparison. Why did they invite them but not me? Do they not like me? Was it something I said? It's impossible to know. They might not know themselves.

    I follow a guideline of "follow their behavior, and if you have extra emotional energy then model the behavior you want to see". If they reach out sometimes, I'll reach out sometimes. If they don't, I don't, until I feel like I have the extra energy to risk them blowing me off or whatever.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    If both are extraverts, then not initiating contact possibly means that person doesn't want to be friends anymore. Which is fine, sometimes it's better for a friendship to end.

    If one is an introvert, then them initiating much less might not mean anything.

    If both are introverts, then not getting messages or calls about banal things may be preferable for both, making them ideal friends.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I am very introverted. Mostly happy by myself, got divorced last year. I rarely hit anyone up. But my friends call or text, sometimes a lot. Sometimes I have to hurt their feelings like I can't talk for an hour on the phone, I got shit to do.

    My friends, a couple, showed up at my house yesterday and practically demanded I go to a park with them. I kept declining they kept asking. I'm so glad I went, it was wonderful springtime sun, barefoot in the grass, dirt, even the mud. I had been cooped up in the house for four days doing recertifications. Good people. I am lucky.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    It's what? Over.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Now imagine if both parties thought like this

    Phone works both ways.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    My mom guilts me over not maintaining a better relationship with my brother, but he will never ever call or text first, despite the fact we used to be really close.

    She wants us to have that again, but we are both adults now and my duty of looking out for my kid brother is done. He can make his own choices and I'm always happy to talk to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • Depends on the person, I think. I hate my phone, and keep it as a requirement to stay connected in a modern world.

    The knock-on effect of that is that I'm constantly overdrawn, and have little energy for the ppl who reach out to me, nvm the ppl I'm now supposed to reach out to.

    Just my experience but I don't think totally invalid

  • source
  • parent