Narrator: We will not take care of them when they come back this time.

Transitional housing for abused women and children would be the ultimate slap in the face.

That would be pretty sicknasty, I'd learn to skateboard so I could go there

Or a glass museum

They're going to have to put up fencing around his eventual grave to stop the long line of people who have been waiting to do exactly that.

How many Teslas can you power from the contents of one of trumps arteries ?

Well, I mean, it would have been a little more dickish if we hadn't pulled out and still sank them after… but yeah.

I guess I can sort-of see where you're coming from. Presumably when they're bombing an airbase they're trying to hit planes, destroy runways, etc. If you're in the break room at the time there's a decent chance you don't die. If you're working on a plane, you're probably dead. But, when you sink a ship, everyone goes into the water and there's a good chance they'll die.

To me, the fact that it happened nowhere near Iran is the bigger deal. It means that parts of the world that aren't aligned with either side in the war now have to wonder what might explode in their own territory.

OTOH, at least when you sink a military ship there won't be civilian casualties. If the US had actually declared war on Iran, which of course never happened, but if... then another warship is actually a valid target. This isn't like blowing up an apartment building because a guy on your kill list is in one of the apartments.

There haven't been any naval battles, but there have been plenty of naval ships sunk.

It's an expansion of the theatre of war, because it happened outside Iran. The method doesn't really matter to the theatre of war. It is different that it was a naval vessel hitting another naval vessel. In the past there have been missiles launched from naval vessels that hit ground or air targets, and plenty of naval vessels sunk by missiles or drones. But, I'm not sure how relevant that is.