I started my IT career in 2011, I have enjoyed it, I have got to do a lot of interesting stuff and meet interesting people, I will treasure those memories forever.

But, starting with crypto turing general computing from being:

"Wow, this machine can run so many apps at the same time!" or "Holy shit, those graphics look epic!" or "Amazing, this computer has really sped up that annoying task!"

To being:

Yo! Look at how many numbers I can generate!

That brought down my enthusiasm severely, but hey, figuring out solutions to problems was still fun.

Then came AI/LLMs.

And with it, a mountain of slop.

Finding help about an issue has gone from googling and reading help articles written by something with an actual brain to mostly being rephrased manuals that only provide working answers to semi standard answers.

Add to that a general push to us AI in anything and everything, no matter how little relevance it holds for the task at hand.

I also remember how AI was sold to the us at first, we were promised to do away with boring paperwork, so we could get on with our actual job.

What did we get? An AI that takes the fun and creative parts, leaving the paperwork for the workers.

We got an AI that we need to expect to be stealing our work and data at every point, giving us shit work back, while being told that we should applaude it and be grateful for it.

And the worst thing, the worst thing is that people seem happy with it. I keep getting requests to buy another Copilot license or asking for another AI service to be added to our tenant, I am sick of it!

We got an AI that somehow has slithered onto the golden throne and can't be questioned.


I am not able to leave the tech market at this time, but I will focus on more tangible hobbies going forward.

This year, I have given myself a project, I will try to build a model railway in a suitcase. That will be a Z-scale tiny world in a suitcase.

I have never done anything remotely like it, but I feel like I need something physical to take my mind off tech.

Sorry for the rant, but I just came off of a high from realizing and putting words to my feelings.

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 156 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

The IT worker pipeline:

help desk > sysadmin > CTO/CISO > goat farmer

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Still on help desk and can't seem to get past it. Goat farmer is already appealing but I can't afford it. There are few job opportunities where I live too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Hey, look on the bright side...

    Most people can't even get help desk jobs these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    I'm devops? Horse shit. Maybe you ain't making 150k right out of college but there are PLENTY of devops jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Its not that no one is getting jobs, its that the market is saturated and getting worse. Tech firms have layed off or off shored hundreds of thousands of workers and with "AI" the number of roles is dropping quickly; especially entry level roles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Yep. Wages and 160k+ out of school are slowing down and mostly going away. Still plenty of the regular stuff left.

    If you know TF, and container deployments you can find a job for 120k all day at the drop off a hat in the states. Send me a resume and I'll ping you to a role we are filling for 140k.

    As a senior I found a role for 210 and turned down 3 150-175k offers 3 months ago.

    It's harder, it's still not physical labor for slave wages.

    There is a right sizing of over hiring as well as everyone scrambling to find what real efficiency AI brings. It's bringing variability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The irony is that the subfield with active hiring is the one that will ultimately make the very work they are doing redundant.

    The magic is gone and the intellectual challenge is fading fast. I saw the writing on the wall and am jumping ship to something decidedly non-tech 🙂

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 33 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I'll hope it will be cool (:

    I'll try to remember to post a follow up in a year here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Microcontroller projects, CAD, and 3D printing were my model train. They got me away from the keyboard warrior parts while still feeding my love for tech and building things.

    Honestly building a Voron kit felt like the first time I built a PC, where you know enough to do it but learn a lot along the way. It was great.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I think those are symptoms of more general trend - IT is not a tool to make people’s lives easier or fun anymore. Until last 5 years all my projects were about making things possible or automating tedious manual tasks. Now, for almost all use cases there is some solution or components you (or AI) can slap together to build a solution. Today it’s all about cutting costs and increasing margins. There is nothing fun or creative in this job, all feedback you get is lower numbers on dashboard. Budgets are squeezed to make more profit, so there is no time to get bored and improve things around you.

    Look, in my IT company, I have to track my time in 3 different system and no-one cares because there is no ROI in automating it. That should tell you in which state IT is

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    It's not only IT. I'm pretty sure we've peaked. We don't try to produce good products or services anymore, just ones that can get quick returns. Get customers and then make it worse, for the shareholders!

    I still have products from >10 years ago which are great and work, but you can buy less and less things like that. Even in sectors that were super reliable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I can relate. I have been in tech for about 30 years now and have never been less interested in it. I used to love learning and implementing new things, and now I’d rather not. I think part of it is the changing landscape for tech but a lot of it is just me. I’m not really playing video games anymore, don’t read the tech-based posts on Lemmy or videos on any of the creator platforms. I don’t care about upgrading my devices, it just seems like a waste of money to drop $1000 on an incremental upgrade and AI that I don’t want.

    Part of it is that I’ve just reached an age where I’m starting to think about what I have done, what I haven’t done and what I’m going to leave behind and what I’m leaving behind is game consoles and a collection of cables that I’ll never use. So, I’ve decided to move on. I’m volunteering at a local living history museum where we are restoring the waterway of a late 1700s grist and woolen mill, rebuilding and preserving something that the community can enjoy long after I’m gone. I’m also learning how to make things. I’m learning woodworking to start making shaker-style furniture and how to process wool and crochet. I’m crocheting a nice wool blanket for my wife so she has something tangible to remember me by if I’m lucky enough to go first. What woodworking tools I don’t have, I’m making. I’ve made a mallet, marking gauge, shooting board, and am just finishing a turning saw that I can use now and will still be usable to someone else long after I’m gone.

    Anyways, to close out this ramble, take a step back from tech and think about legacy. Tech is just a tool and it’s rare that it will allow you leave behind anything lasting. It’s frustrating and lonely and it’s only getting worse. Get out and do something for your community or make something for your loved ones. Find the ability to take personal satisfaction in doing instead of consuming. You’ll be happier.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    That can be a dangerous line of thought …..

    Started thinking of my legacy and

    • I’m divorced
    • I’ve been bad at keeping up with friends
    • I’m unlikely to have grandkids and am estranged from my only niece
    • I live far from my family
    • my kids can’t afford to live in my town
    • I won’t be able to leave a house or other inheritance
    • even if one of my kids has kids I’m not sure I can run around with them anymore

    Everything I’ve done has no lasting value. I’ve always loved tech and can fix the problem of the day but a year or two later that’s no longer relevant

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    I would love to leave tech. Desperately. But I feel that I have no other real skills, and I have a mortgage that I need to pay and a house to maintain. I do have savings, but it would probably only last a year at best.

    I would love to do something outdoors. Like, maybe for WA state's park services. But I've heard that's super competitive and next to impossible to get into without first volunteering for years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago* (9 children)

    Its not fucking fun to be on the computer anymore. They changed it and now it sucks. It used to be so cool

    • Conner O'Malley
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    It's fun if you're running Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    As long as you stay on your local system and dont browse the web or any modern apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    dont browse the web Facebook or any modern Google/iPhone Store apps.

    The internet used to be a space for weird geeky hobbyists that more traditional plebs couldn't access or couldn't be bothered to fuck with. Now it's still that, but it has a bunch of shit for the rubes, too.

    At some point, I feel like I'm talking to someone who says "I fucking hate Florida. Every time I go, I spend a week at Disney World and it's expensive and awful and loud and stupid." And here I am, out in the Keys, working on my tan and fishing and hiking and hooking up with cuties, having no problems whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    All modern web browsers are ass, even Firefox (though considerably less so than the alternatives that arent forks). So even browsing the web sucks now because most sites are business or corporations. So yes, you can visit your favorite blog, but its still not the same as it was in the 90s or early 00s. Fucken computers bullshit, its fucken sick

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    So yes, you can visit your favorite blog, but its still not the same as it was in the 90s or early 00s.

    It absolutely is. I might argue podcasts have kinda usurped the old blogging space (or, at least, supplanted it). But I've got an RSS feed full of blogs I follow that are barely different that what I was looking at 30 years ago. The 90s is alive on Feedly.

    Fucken computers bullshit, its fucken sick

    Lolz.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I would ssy Usenet is the only place left that gives me 90s vibes besides maybe like batMUD and other old games. I literally stay away from the rest of the web thats not the fediverse, Steam, or GoG. The woods I grew up.in has been turned into a tacky suburb.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    What? Sounds like the last time you tried it was a decade ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago

    Hehe, I have been aware of suitcase model railways for a long time, probably about two decades or so, but never felt like I had the skill to build one before.

    At the end of the pandemic I got hit with dual flat feet, dual heel spurs and a bad knee at the same time.

    It was a bad time for me, every step hurt, to the point that I ate six paracetamols and a few ibuprofen every day just to cope, and when walking home from the bus after work, I cried hard due to the pain of every single step.

    During this time, I snowed in on videos about making dioramas, especially this video stuck with me:

    https://youtu.be/HEG3d0cMuv4

    I loved the weathering and how real it looked.

    Anyway, I got help for my feet and knee, and mostly moved on from the videos, but never forgot about the above video.

    I got laid off at my earlier job and got this job, it is far more stressful, and I have been feeling depressed, so I have been looking for something to do.

    I recently did some simple wood working stuff, and found I quite enjoyed it.

    So I decided to give this a try.

    I have a workbench at home, in a utility room in my apartment, it used to be occupied with a shit load of rum and other alcohol, but last weekend I went and bought a small Billy bookshelf at IKEA and turned that into an fairly elegant bar shelf.

    (Just a quick note, just because I have a lot of alcohol at home and live alone doesn't mean that I drink a lot.

    I mostly collect because I find it interesting to have a selection to pick from.

    I drink alcohol maybe once every other month, often less.)

    So now I have a workspace, I need to make room under the workbench, get a chair and some proper lights and I can start the project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    Everything is a scam. It feels like no engineers exist any longer. It’s not even just tech it’s everything. I bought a jar from a major retailer and the lids don’t fit right on them.

    It’s pretty obvious capitalism has run its course. What i don’t get is the amount of people helping destroy the world they have to live in or worse—they are having kids in a world they are actively making shitty for six figures.

    Then they use their kids as the excuse to make the world worse for everyone else! “I can’t afford not to!”

    Well, what you actually can’t afford is to keep doing this. Quit working for these public corps. Sacrifice everything to not work for them. I promise you’ll be better off after some pain. Coming from someone with no actual education that made it out you college grads can do it. I believe in you.

    And your kids don’t need large Christmas’s and a new car at 16 with private school. They do need a functioning world.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    At this point tech is a hostile malevolent force.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    When I became a sysadmin 24 years ago, I figured the general public was still adapting to the rapid overnight advancements and integration into the tech industry. I assumed that as people figured out how to use software and computer technology in their daily lives, help desk support would practically disappear and we'd be able to move our efforts toward fully maintaining systems instead of customers.

    I had no idea how resistant the general public would be to actually learning and understanding technology. We went from recommending customers avoid certain bad programs and hardware, to being forced to incorporate them into our infrastructure because the general public didn't want to give them up.

    My professional opinion was overruled many times because someone higher up the food chain wanted to use a device or app that hurt our client base or mission parameters, but was familiar to them, so they wanted it included in our suite of tools.

    I'm grateful to see a lot of public resistance to AI, even if corporations are doubling down on their investment into the technology. But I don't have any hope for the future of technology or the general public who use it daily. AI is just the latest excuse for people to not learn how to use technology efficiently.

    I expected younger generations to be raised on this tech and be absolute wizards in its use, understanding it even better than I do! Instead, they were raised on slop and ad-riddled ADHD-promoting garbage apps that rotted their brains and prevented them from learning basic tools and functions. As a millennial, I've spent the better half of a decade teaching boomers how to use this tech, and then the next decade trying to reeducate zoomers on how to properly use tech and break their life-long bad habits.

    I retired from the IT industry after only 20 years. Now I enjoy tinkering with technology in my free time. I always enjoyed teaching people how to use their personal computers and smartphones, but I can't spend another minute on a help desk, fielding calls from people who still don't know how to read error messages that pop up in their face. AI will be the death of the industry if integrated into everything and left unchecked. Maybe it'd be for the best.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago*

    This is my story too. I hate what tech became, so I tried to pivot careers. I did a few other things, but due to a long list of reasons, I’m back doing tech work. I’m no longer help desk or working directly for an IT department. More of an in-house advisor and consultant with light sysadmin work.

    I used to brew my beer and now I build and use 3D printers. The physical world is more interesting to me than all those extra numbers today’s processors can crunch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I can honestly say that I dread the future of tech, and the goat farm thing sounds really appealing.

    I went to a local store the other day and saw 2 new flock cameras that went up. There was one person manning 8 self checkout stations, and there was a camera watching me scan and bag my own stuff while displaying a live feed of me. I hopped in my car, which automatically turned on GPS and then my phone started giving me "helpful" suggestions like " have you tried out this restaurant nearby?" and "it's been a while since you've been to the pet store to get stuff". I suddenly felt like a boiled frog, because I don't remember turning any of that shit on, or being notified about it being turned on, or seeing info about new surveillance cameras going up in the community. At this point, I want to buy some land in the middle of fucking nowhere and disconnect from all that shit, and I legitimately had a low-level panic about all of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We should start a community of like-minded individuals who live in the middle of nowhere, prefer simplicity, and communicate through dialup. The dialup thing solely because it's easy to set up and has a low enough speed to avoid the mess the worlds turned into

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago

    The problem isn't the tools, but rather the sociopath executives and the individuals who won't stick up for themselves. Everyone loses when people don't stand up for what's right.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Sounds like you are doing sysadmin work for an public institution or so where people are only bullshitting their jobs. Maybe try moving to something more impactful? Like rail infrastructure or so?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Pivot to OT or telecommunication. Actual telecommunications in any industrial setting is screaming for capable people and is normally focused on providing critical safety systems. You may have to work for a soul destroying Oil and Gas company, but you could also get into rail or power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    That actually sounds quite interesting!

    I find telecoms to be interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I really like the work, Equipment tends to be a lot more diverse than bog standard IT, networks and systems more targeted to specific applications, technologies could be anything from ethernet to P2P microwave to satcoms to mobile radio to cellular to SDH/PDH, supported applications/systems will keep you forever learning, work locations can be pretty varied. While the industry generally struggles for staff, breaking in can be tough, but I think so long as you're a straight shooter and willing to learn you're generally fine. People transition in from IT all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    For almost my entire career I have been working in the finance industry, my past place of work was amazing, if I get an offer to go back, I would go immediately.

    I wouldn't mind working in IT at a rail company, would be interesting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    finance industry

    That's the worst, mate. Just switching to a different filed may improve things. Nowhere is sunshine and rainbows, but I'm I'm in medical tech and not finance. Helping save lives is at least something I believe in, instead of moving money to siphon money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    sysadmin work for an public institution or so where people are only bullshitting their jobs.

    About half my career and part of my current contract load is to a public organization of one type or another. But I've been half and half anyway.

    Dotcom is a wasteland of gunners/pluggers and wageslaves, none of them afforded enough time to get anything complete and good. Public orgs with union contracts employ people with a good life balance and the freedom to do a great job about 95% of the time, after the layers of regulations are met.

    I found slackers at both types of org: the public slacker is a hapless clod whose tasks all get reassigned and he really doesn't do much. He's about 3% of the workforce. The dotcom slacker is a harried guy muddling through something he's not trained for, with no help since his peers have their own KPIs, hoping like fuck he can get Project Grapefruit done by next Town Hall meeting lest he be voted off the island. Again, 3%.

    The public org is great people who've done this work effectively their entire career. They're astoundingly good at it, and are still energized by the work and the educational programmes. Dotcoms have no training and the few people who make it past 2 years are likely PIPped by year 4 because of the "fresh talent" policy

    I envy the public org people. I miss my non-work life sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Let me give an example that matches my own discouragement and might also explain yours.

    In the middle of last century, the woodworking industry that created fine furniture started experiencing a shift. Due to the sudden explosion of wages and wealth and population in the late 40s to 70s, products had to be made faster and cheaper.

    One method was to lower the quality of inputs. Plywood instead of hardwood. Then fiberboard/chipboard instead of plywood.

    We see the same system in play now, with AI automation and it’s gratuitous hallucinations. It is essentially garbage materials in order to save time and money.

    But another method was also in automating the work. Whereas before craftsmen used hand planes and chisels, newer craftsmen used electric shapers and planers. And later, CNC machines stepped in to produce delicate and complicated designs in a fraction of the time - and frequently even more precisely and more cleanly - than anyone with a carving chisel could do.

    And that is the part which is NOT being effectively duplicated in IT.

    Sure, AI can automate the work, but instead of maintaining quality, said quality of work is also taking a nosedive in tandem with the quality of materials.

    And that is what is discouraging me six ways to Sunday. It’s garbage on both sides of the coin, and not just one. There is no part of the equation in which I can still take pride in. It’s all depressive, disgusting slop that I would be ashamed to put my name to.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Humans are the CNC machines in your analogy here. Basically we are left to clean up after the sloppy material inputs to get reasonable outputs. It's just that techbros don't believe that is (or at least will ultimately be) necessary and that AI can do this step.

    The jury is already in on current tech (techbros are wrong), and still out on coming tech in this space, but it seems very unlikely (past experience with tech bros says they are hype machines and full of shit).

    So what we land on with AI acting as the CNC is this pseudo facade where the furniture it cranks out looking OK from a distance, up close it's pretty garbage but while everyone is starting (or forced) to sit on the chairs, it looks like they aren't really load bearing...

    now... apply this to IT, Medical, Financial, Military and any other serious application and you don't have to wonder why people are concerned anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I disagree with humans being the CNC machines. In both cases, humans instruct the technology to create the designs, but it is the machine which is digging into the product to create the visual patterns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    One method was to lower the quality of inputs. Plywood instead of hardwood. Then fiberboard/chipboard instead of plywood.

    In fairness, hardwood is in limited supply. It takes a long time to produce, is expensive to harvest correctly, and typically means demolishing old growth forests to obtain. The "lower quality" products definitely have their trade-offs, but a lot of the quality issues are resolved through engineering improvements and materials sciences.

    I would argue the real downside of lower quality inputs is the advent of "disposable" furniture (the IKEA brand crap most notably). Stuff that could have been designed to last, but isn't, and ends up in landfills after moving day as a result. Rather than a savings yield, what you get is a waste surplus.

    And later, CNC machines stepped in to produce delicate and complicated designs in a fraction of the time - and frequently even more precisely and more cleanly - than anyone with a carving chisel could do.

    And that is the part which is NOT being effectively duplicated in IT.

    Lolwhut? We've come so far even in the last ten years, in terms of IDEs, deployment pipelines, and automated unit testing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    Hey now, also don't forget that the Epstein class is forcing OS level identity verification on all devices now

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm the only "active tech" at my tiny local shop/"MSP". I have two bosses who are each "owners" of the company and neither of them can fix their own workstations.

    Neither can handle domain DNS changes. Neither of them can migrate mail. Neither of them have taken "support" calls for the last 5 years- instead they've transferred everything technical beyond "restart your PC" to me. I've seen a few people younger than me around who actually have basic understanding of internet DNS, TCP/IP, but for the most part I'm starting to think that after my generation, the internet will corrode, collapse, and die. I hope I'm wrong, UNLESS the internet continues being handled largely by 5 gigantic, evil corporations- in THAT case I hope it dies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It will become a more specialized, niche knowledge. It's similar to cars. In the 1950s, it was extremely common for regular people to know how to fix their own car. But as cars became more reliable and complex, fewer and fewer now know how. There's still a definite market for mechanics and mechanical engineers, but it's a specialty line. You go to college, or generally go through a manufacturer's training program.

    What's going to change are the expectations and expertise going in. When Microslop wants new developers, or support staff, or whatever else, the candidates aren't going to be (as) familiar with it going in. They won't be able to meaningfully apply their knowledge of similar systems and products.

    They'll have to bring back extensive company-led training programs.

    This will apply to every large tech company, regardless of field. In your networking example, it would probably be run by Cisco, which isn't too different from how it is today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    But as cars became more reliable and complex, fewer and fewer now know how.

    There is also DRM and other shenanigans going on.

    For example, just to replace your brake pads - something that most everyone should be able to do - requires, on most average modern cars made in the last 2-3 years, a $1,000,000 piece of software with a $6,000/mo subscription package.

    Why? Because until the vehicle manufacturer authorizes that brake pad replacement, that vehicle will refuse to even turn on, much less move. It needs to obtain cryptographically-signed approval from the manufacturer for the work that had been done to it in order for it to even turn over the engine.

    Now your average car owner isn’t going to have these means, so everything gets pushed off to manufacturer-authorized repair depots, invariably car dealerships, where everything can be nickel-and-dimed to maximum revenue.

    This lack of repairability is one of three major reasons why I will never personally own a vehicle manufactured after 2006.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    A bit of unrequested advice... Help expand, or start a mesh network in your area. The SX1260 lora chips are a modern miracle. Plus, It's basically hiking and socializing activity masked as a tech hobby. There's also a chance of learning a little bit of physics, or community organizing as a bonus.

    With the new people you meet, there's also a chance of finding a new hobby. I've met an unexpected number of paraglidists through my various tech interests. People from all kinds of backgrounds are really into flying. Who knew?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 9 points 8 months ago

    I have actually thought about setting up a Meshtastic node, or perhaps even setting up a LORA link for a personal project.

    During the pandemic, my dad asked me to see if we could set up a water temp sensor at a local swimming hole, a few months of work with a raspberry pi, a DS8B20, a motorcycle battery, a web hotel and a friendly neighbor later and we have for several years had an automatic website displaying the current temp in the water at the swimming hole, we borrow the neighbor's wifi, and send the data to the webhotel.

    It would be interesting to see if instead of relying on the neighbors wifi we could use LORA nodes to send the data to a node at home and have that submit the data to the webhotel

    It was fun and built in bash/php/mysql with zero ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    I've been working in tech for about 10 years now as well, and I'm also just feeling tired. I'm a bit sad, because I like my job. I didn't study computer science or anything in college; I just got work in security because I enjoyed it. It's sad pretty much knowing it won't be the same. I don't really want to offload a lot of the work to an AI in the future.

    I've been getting more into learning to weld and work with wood. In the next few years I'll probably consider starting a small custom furniture company.

    I feel like this part of the conversation is drowned by the AI hype train and the AI hate train. The part where real people are seeing the real effects of a technology that is actually good, and is likely going to get better, and will have the potential for significant social damage to a large part of the middle class.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Your possible future sounds wonderful, I wish you every success with it.


    If I could leave work and keep the same salary, I would...

    As for what I would do, I enjoy photography ( https://metapixl.com/stoy ), I would probably buy a reliable car and start driving around europe taking photos of interesting places.

    I might also start buying used cameras and set up a local studio called something like "snåljåpens fotobibliotek", or "The cheapskate's photo library" where for a monthly fee you can rent older but good cameras and equipment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    I feel your pain. I started IT in '94. Saw the excitement (AMD breaking the 1GHz barrier, High-speed internet, to name a few), then saw it go downhill just as fast.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    As someone with similar feelings in general and a similar history, I feel you are blaming only the latest and worse effects on tech and of tech on society.

    I started my career in parallel with mobile devices and smartphones. The whole idea of new possibilities, new ways to interact with tech, miniaturization, etc., is what called me most as it was a huge field starting and I tried to find my path forward. I've seen from close, real close, how an incredible tech, full of possibilities has been slowly been captured by the market capitalists that inevitably always ended up controlling the direction of every company.

    This is not caused by crypto, this is not caused by LLMs. The origin is greed and capitalism. Decisions being made to make number go up.

    Really, crypto is a fascinating tech, it's not the fault of the technology that crypto-bros came to conquer everything and misuse it and abused it to make a quick buck.

    LLMs are impressive, think about it, we have managed to completely break the Turing test. We have machines that sound so human that mostly everyone is in a constant suspicion that everything they see is made by an LLM. LLMs sound so human that they are full of confidence and mostly always full of shit. Just think about it, AI is just a representation of humanity, what we do with it just represents and highlights the issues in society.

    The reality is that those two, have just suffered a faster, the fastest we've seen yet probably, tech lifecycle - growth, hype, plateauing, and eventually decline and enshittification of any service related to the tech.

    Consider search engines, their demise is not because of AI, AI is just the last blow. I used to be very good at finding what I wanted, I knew how to use the tool to make the best of it. Slowly over the years much as I want, I cannot get the results I want without a lot of effort. I haven't somehow become shit at it, the tools and the tech have been modified and changed until it has become useless, the whole point is not finding anymore, but making you search as much as possible.

    Consider the mobile hardware field as it is now, compared to the years when it started blowing up with all kind of devices and possibilities. The market has been captured, a few companies remain, releasing the same thing over and over with the latest and bigger number each year. Slowly the whole wild world we had of custom roms, has been captured so that if you get out of the fenced field your apps won't work because it is not safe. Apps check that you are using them in an unmodified and perfectly controlled OS where you own nothing. Apple has always been king of fenced fields, but now Google is doing all it can to imitate it, squeezing in and trying to capture as much of their open field into their very high fenced safe areas. They want to control the source of apps, the developers, and remove the freedom from the devices. It's crypto and LLMs at a slower pace. Working for so many years as a developer I can feel how I'm more and more tied up to the whims and wishes of companies that don't pay me the salary, I keep bringing this up and make a safer path for the future but the company that does pay my salary doesn't care, they just want the latest BS and hyped concepts.

    People like you or me, we have a special vantage point. We know how we can still fight that, we know what are the alternatives, we know what the tech could become. We need to bring that knowledge to everyone, keep pushing for FOSS solutions, keep teaching everyone that tech is not difficult, it's not magic, but it requires learning and education. It requires not falling on the path of less resistance, and fight against lobbying and market capture. It's tough, when we just get so tired of constantly fighting it. What I think you find so tiring is not Crypto and LLMs but how tech is being guided to its demise, to become a tool for control and nothing more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    The origin is greed and capitalism

    Really, crypto is a fascinating tech, it’s not the fault of the technology that crypto-bros came to conquer everything and misuse it and abused it to make a quick buck.

    Blockchain Radicals: How Capitalism Ruined Crypto is a fascinating read.

    What I think you find so tiring is not Crypto and LLMs but how tech is being guided to its demise, to become a tool for control and nothing more.

    I struggle with this, especially in my Socialist org. Everybody (Leftists) seems so anti-tech. I get it, the oligarchs and fascists currently own basically all tech right now, and are weaponizing it against us. But it really is useful tech in the right context ... we have to wrestle control back and fight!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    An AI that takes the fun and creative parts

    AI also sucks at them. It's just a very convenient excuse for the owner class to act out their firing of workers after the overhirings of 2020, and if it can turn their workers into the mythical 10x engineers people in the industry talked about, that's a bonus.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago* (13 children)

    It really doesn't suck at them. AI writes great code; I think we just want it to suck. It can't magically generate a new Linux kernel, but the small tasks I've seen it do have all been mostly above average. (I have also seen some complete garbage, yes, mostly above average)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    "Small tasks" are the key there. It can write a small script or spin up application boilerplate very well, but it really struggles with long-term maintenance and new features on a complex application.

    I spend about as much time telling the AI "no, not like that" as it supposedly saves me from not having to type the code manually.

    It does have some value, but I'd put it around a 10% boost -- not the 500% boost that senior leadership insists it can do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Right, but I think we're kidding ourselves if we don't think it's going to get better. I have no doubt it will be able to magically generate a new Linux kernel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    You say that, but you have to remember that LLMs produce the average output of their training materials. Not the best, but the average. And there's a lot of code out there that is simple. Only the outliers have the magic combination of conciseness AND quality AND complexity.

    LLMs also have no understanding of context outside the immediate. Satire is completely opaque to them. Sarcasm is lost on them, by and large. And they have no way to differentiate between good and bad output. Or good and bad input, for that matter. Joke pseudocode is just as valid in their training corpus as dire warnings about insecure code.

    I read a comment once that still rings true - "Hallucinations" are a misnomer. Everything an LLM puts out is a hallucination; it's just that a lot of the time, it happens to be accurate. Eliminating that last percentage of inaccurate hallucinations is going to be nearly impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (2 children)

    I'd push back on your point here with a few things:

    The primary one being: the code doesn't need to be perfect or even above average -- average is perfectly fine. The idea here is comparing the AI to a human, not to perfection. I see this constantly with AI and I find it a bit disingenuous.

    I do truly believe what I said above will be possible within my career (I'm in my mid 30s), but it's not really what I'm worried about right now. I think the current code I see being generated is generally "good enough". I'm not comparing it to perfect: I'm comparing it to people.

    I read a comment once that still rings true - “Hallucinations” are a misnomer. Everything an LLM puts out is a hallucination; it’s just that a lot of the time, it happens to be accurate. Eliminating that last percentage of inaccurate hallucinations is going to be nearly impossible.

    I don't see any reason you have to remove all hallucinations to get a good tool for autonomous development: humans aren't perfect either. We compensate for that with processes and checking each others work, but plenty still falls through the cracks.

    LLMs also have no understanding of context outside the immediate. Satire is completely opaque to them. Sarcasm is lost on them, by and large. And they have no way to differentiate between good and bad output. Or good and bad input, for that matter. Joke pseudocode is just as valid in their training corpus as dire warnings about insecure code.

    Have you seen output in which satirical code is actually included? I'm well aware of things like https://www.anthropic.com/research/small-samples-poison and the potential here. And do you not believe that either (a) these types of trivial issues would be caught by a person whose job was just to audit output or even (b) this type of issue could be caught by specially trained domain limited AIs designed to check output?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    I think the current code I see being generated is generally “good enough”. I’m not comparing it to perfect: I’m comparing it to people.

    If this were true, then open source projects would have much less of an issue with pull requests from sloperators.

    Have you seen output in which satirical code is actually included?

    I wouldn't expect to see it. Satirical code requires more thought than an LLM is capable of putting into its writing - you need to understand what is expected of whoever you're satirizing, and then you have to take that expectation and take it a step further into the absurd. Without having that context of something that is specifically being satirized, what you have instead is just incorrect code. And again, the LLM is incapable of valuing proper code over intentionally wrong code, so it's going to poison the database to some extent.

    And LLMs don't drop big chunks of copy-pasted code from Stack Exchange like an intern would. They work one token at a time. (Which is why trying to get them to understand that quotations need to be all in one piece is a futile endeavor.)

    Besides, 'satirical code' is just one example of the many things that can poison the training. I couldn't even begin to enumerate all the things that could mess with it, and honestly I'm surprised that LLMs do as well as they do considering they likely have all sorts of cross-language screwball connections (which may be why it has such a tendency to make up libraries; it doesn't necessarily understand that a common PHP library doesn't exist in Java).

    do you not believe that either (a) these types of trivial issues would be caught by a person whose job was just to audit output or even (b) this type of issue could be caught by specially trained domain limited AIs designed to check output?

    These issues could be caught by someone whose job it is to audit code, sure. The problem is that sloperators often don't audit their own stuff well enough. They leave it to the open source repo's admins. When pull requests from overeager noobs were infrequent, it wasn't the problem; they could gently correct them, the repo would stay high-quality, the noob would learn, everyone is fine. But now, sloperators are dumping low-quality pull requests on the repos faster than the admins can sort through them - because it now takes less time to produce slop code than it takes to determine whether or not the slop is worth including. The admins are swamped, because they can't sort the wheat from the chaff fast enough.

    A domain-limited AI designed to check output would be useful - if it could be trusted. Open-source project admins are some of the best coders out there, and they vastly outstrip the capabilities of LLMs. You're suggesting that we replace THEM with an agent. They are in that position because they're right far more often than they're wrong when it comes to understanding the code as it exists, and how incoming code would impact it - or at least they're right often enough to keep the project alive. LLMs will be worse at that job, I guarantee it. They'd be fast, but they'd be wrong too often. This is the primary issue with LLM agents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    You’re suggesting that we replace THEM with an agent.

    I am not suggesting we replace anyone, least of all the open source community, so let's not put words in my mouth

    I think the current code I see being generated is generally “good enough”. I’m not comparing it to perfect: I’m comparing it to people.

    If this were true, then open source projects would have much less of an issue with pull requests from sloperators.

    This doesn't follow to me. A good tool in the hand of a crappy user doesn't suddenly make good output. I specifically said that LLMs write good code in a specific setting. Clearly random person generating thousands of lines at a time for a project they don't understand isn't that setting.

    You seem to be very focused on crappy code generated by people that don't know what they're doing, the technology isn't good enough for that, so yes, it won't work in that setting, I agree.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    It really doesn’t suck at them. AI writes great code; I think we just want it to suck.

    Citation? I’m really asking because I’ve yet to hear about anything above a toy project that has had any verifiable success with AI code generation as a major component of their workflow.

    As in a like for like improvement in code quality, security, bug occurrences and severity, developer efficiency, all that jazz, not just the standard "we've funnelled so much money in to this we are almost fiscally required to claim success"

    its not a dig, i really want to see one so i can found out how it was done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    Claude commits to GitHub with the same name no matter who uses it. You can see every single line of open source code it has written (for GitHub only of course): https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc. Look around as you please, most of it is just fine.

    People that I know to be good developers have also shared their experiences with it and say yes, it has written good code for them. I've personally used ChatGPT to generate very mundane tasks and the code it output was more than adequate.

    It introduces security bugs and subtle bugs at probably the same rate as a human (I have no "citation" there, just what I've seen). It needs to be "driven" by a human, yes, but it's not clear for how long it will need to be, and even if it always does, personally I don't want my job to be to "drive an AI".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I appreciate the answer but that's not at all what i asked.

    I have anecdotes and personal experience i could cite but that's not particularly helpful in a general sense.

    Pointing to claude submissions in projects is actively less than helpful in this case because it only proves that single files in isolation look like they are well written, it gives no indication of overall project quality.

    People that I know to be good developers have also shared their experiences with it and say yes, it has written good code for them. I’ve personally used ChatGPT to generate very mundane tasks and the code it output was more than adequate.

    So in a very limited context the code generated for you personally was acceptable, that's great, i've found much the same, but that's a far cry from "AI writes great code; I think we just want it to suck."

    It's somewhat my bad though, when i say "citation" i don't need a full research paper (though that would be nice) i'd like something a bit more substantial than a "trust me bro".

    It introduces security bugs and subtle bugs at probably the same rate as a human (I have no “citation” there, just what I’ve seen)

    That's a load-bearing probably, my experience has been the polar opposite of that, I’ve been involved in two major AI initiatives and both choked hard on security and domain bugs. That could very well be a project management or company specific issue, hence the search for successful projects to compare.

    My quest continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    I didn't say "trust me bro" and showing Claude submissions is sufficient for analyzing code in the context I believe it is good: one file at a time and one task at a time. This is also the same realm that a human is good. You are welcome to look at the project as a whole to determine the "project quality" as well: it's open source. But I'm not here to argue: I believe this tech that is barely in its infancy is already quite good and going to get better, and I'm already considering what it will do to my life. If you don't, that's fine.


    I'll add here that I find it very frustrating to talk about these "AI agents" and their code output, because it's something we're all close to and spent a lot of time learning. The concept of "a machine" getting "better than us" so quickly, with the background context of an industry that is chomping at the bit to replace humans makes these discussions inherently difficult and really emotional. I feel genuine sadness when I think about it. If the world were different we'd probably all be stoked. I don't want the AI to be better than me, and I currently don't believe it is, but I think:

    1. My belief doesn't stop the market. People do believe that it is better than me or at least good enough. This has a real effect on my life and the lives of people I know.
    2. I don't see any fundamental reason it won't get better at development. Part of the reason it struggles with large projects is context: that doesn't sound like a fundamental engineering constraint to me, it sounds like a memory constraint. Specialization will also make it better and better I assume.
    3. Even if it is never better than me, it will certainly be more efficient and eventually the market will consider my time better spent correcting its output or guiding it, removing the fun part of the work in my mind.

    I don't think my job is currently on the chopping block today: I don't do development I do security work. But I do think it will either be on the chopping block or fundamentally change sooner than I'm comfortable with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    That's on me, I meant the equivalent of a "trust me bro" , in this case an anecdotal "me and the people I know all say..."

    showing Claude submissions is sufficient for analyzing code in the context I believe it is good

    Yes, in the context you provided it makes sense, as a response to my question which specified examples of larger projects/workflows, it does not.

    Im not here to argue either, I asked a specific question and your answer didn't really address any of it, i was just pointing that out.


    I too find it frustrating but it seems for different reasons.

    I really really dislike the way it's being sold as a solution for things it's in no way a solution for.

    They do certain things fine, good even, but blanket statements like "their code is great" without appropriate qualifiers is contributing to the validation of these bullshit sales-oriented claims of task competency.

    1: agreed

    2: then I think you are missing the fundamental limitations of the current approaches, but we can agree to disagree on this.

    3: see 2

    I agree with jobs on the chopping block, though i think that's in large part due to poor due diligence and planing by management, but that's nothing new, the same thing has and is still happening with offshoring (throwing more people at a problem generally won't solve design and governance issues).

    I also think the current systems aren't capable of being a viable replacement for anything above junior level stuff, if that ( not that that doesn't present it's own problems )

    I think the difference in opinion comes from my belief that LLM's and the current tooling around them aren't fundamentally capable of replacing existing resources, not that they just don't have the power yet.

    Putting increasing large compute in a calculator won't magically make it a spreadsheet application.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    To your point then: what are your thoughts on this project? https://github.com/anthropics/claudes-c-compiler I'm not particularly interested in this use case right now but it seems more in line with what you're interested in.

    I think it shows a lot of limitations but also a lot of potential. I don't personally think the AI needs to get the code perfect on the first go -- it has to be compared to humans and we definitely don't do that.

    I really really dislike the way it’s being sold as a solution for things it’s in no way a solution for.

    Yes, of course. I think it's important to look passed the blowhards and think about what it's actually doing: that is the perspective I'm trying to talk about this from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    My initial thoughts are that my original ask was this :

    because I’ve yet to hear about anything above a toy project that has had any verifiable success with AI code generation as a major component of their workflow.

    and the example you provided was a toy project used as a publicity stunt.

    On the technical side i don't know enough rust to be able to weigh in on the technical accuracy of the project.

    The ability for current LLM's to churn out something that looks relatively good at first glance isn't my point of contention, most of us know it can do that.

    I'm just looking for a single medium to large project that is successfully being used in production (close to production is also fine) that was created with significant LLM involvement.

    There is so much talk around this, that the fact i haven't come across any mention of a successful deliverable (in the context i mentioned) raises all sorts of red flags for me, personally.

    I'm not trying to catch you out, it's just that i haven’t seen one so i was wondering if you have, if you haven't that's fine, it's not a trap.

    I think it shows a lot of limitations but also a lot of potential. I don’t personally think the AI needs to get the code perfect on the first go – it has to be compared to humans and we definitely don’t do that.

    Iterative progress is generally the way of things, but most non-trivial agentic workflows already work with iterative code generation and testing so expecting a correct solution at the end of that process is more reasonable than you would think.

    The difference between people and LLM's is the types of interactions you have with them, you can ask the LLM to explain why it did something, but if you've ever tried that I’m sure you can understand why it's not the same as the kind of answers you'd get from a person.

    Yes, of course. I think it’s important to look passed the blowhards and think about what it’s actually doing: that is the perspective I’m trying to talk about this from.

    As am i, I’m not against LLM usage, I’m against the pretense that it has capabilities it does not, in fact, have.

    Selling something on the basis of it being able to do something it can't do is where term "snake oil salesman" comes from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    Copilot’s braindead and flat out wrong comments on PRs are downright dangerous. Drives me nuts. Tired of explaining why it’s wrong.

    Search is useless. All the useful blogs, sites and forums are dead or gone.

    Watching people panic over losing their jobs for teams I support is depressing. We know what these KPIs and etc are for… and why they suddenly care about them.

    Try to distract myself with other projects too.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    This year, I have given myself a project, I will try to build a model railway in a suitcase. That will be a Z-scale tiny world in a suitcase.

    I used to make miniature buildings out of things like balsa wood, spackle, etc for D&D. It became a challenge to see how closely I could simulate things like grass, torches, etc.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    I got laid off and now I'm working as a Door guy at some local bars. Im poor but happy.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I was where you were a few months ago. It's an awful feeling and I've been obsessed with computers for 28 years. This has been exceptionally difficult for me. I had a really rough year end where I was working on recurring critical defects for weeks. I caused most of them (proximate cause) but the state of the industry itself is what placed me in an impossible position where I was having to make things of poor quality that nobody likes.

    Technology itself is not the problem. There is nothing inherently wrong with AI. The way it has presented itself to the world is because of greed and a feeding frenzy. The way it is and works now makes it a bad tool. A tool that does a good job 80% of the time is garbage. It's being shoved at us with little regard for us and the consequences.

    But I am hopeful. I am using AI for my personal projects. It's not really a choice for me. For many years I've tried to get people to work with me on something; anything really. But it either didn't happen or fizzled out very quickly. These are ideas that I couldn't execute on my own, and now I can.

    So there is a way to find opportunity in chaos. And this is the phase we are in.

    I can also see positive things coming out of this. I've seen quite a few total newbies who switched to Linux who said they would have been stuck without AI and given up.

    The failure of this massive experiment will become the basis for new innovation. We should be perplexed at where we are now, considering how windows forms apps were easier to build 15 years ago than a basic web app is now. We accumulated a lot of complexity without our productivity increasing, instead we are in desperation trying to throw money and "compute" at the complexity.

    AI kind of feels like asbestos to me. Too useful to ignore and too harmful to embrace. But I really think that from some unexpected corners we might see a new era for technology emerging. I am optimistic.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    How did AI help linux noobs? Sounds interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    If they didn't have a friend helping them they would ask AI when they had setup issues. Quite a few of them said they wouldn't have been able to do it without the LLM.

    They probably could have but it can be hard to sift through forum posts if you're new at something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I feel the same. I've been wanting out from tech since AI started being big. My current job is sorting through a mountain of slop to uncover all the bugs. It's a nightmare, but it's not my creating. I've taken to just pushing the problem up. It's not my fault managers created this problem, so why should I suffer.

    But honestly, I don't give a fuck anymore. It's just a job to pay for my food. We are part of the assembly line and go home.

    That said, I think it might be time for large tech unions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I am a Swede, we have unions baded on sectors instead of just places of work, we also allow sympathy strikes.

    One of the most epic union stories here was in the 90s when Toys 'R Us was opening here.

    The Swedish labour market is notoriously unregulated by the government, even more so back then, we had no minimum wage (still effectively don't), the market was/is mostly regulated between employers and unions themselves with minimal involvement from the government.

    So when TRU tried to avoid signing a collective bargaining agreement with the union for storeworkers, the union called a strike so union workers hired by the company stopped going, well the company hired non union replacements and thought that was that.

    The Swedish unions did not agree.

    Sympathy strikes started.

    The transport union refused to make deliveries for TRU, the printers union refused to print material for TRU, and even the financial workers union refused to process transactions for TRU.

    A few months later, TRU caved and signed an agreement with the union, and the strikes ended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    Same here. Can't add much to the conversation though. All this stupid AI babysitting and bullshitting sucks the fun out of my profession. For a while now I felt it might be time to leave the tech sector entirely. Unfortunately that's the only thing I'm comfortably good at.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    It's not just tech ...I used to like life. There's barely humanity left in this foundation we live on.

    I can't help but wonder if maybe this is all the same thing the Muslim extremists fight against in their jihads. Maybe we're the real evil.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago

    I can't help but wonder if maybe this is all the same thing the Muslim extremists fight against in their jihads.

    Definitely. Seeing the worst sides of capitalism and imperialism, which for a long time made life in the west bearable or even good for most people, radicalized them. But their vision of how things should be is very unappealing to me as well. Theocracy, strict morality laws, misogyny, that's not a better solution. I prefer left-wing radicalization instead, because that's about making everyone's lifes better. ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›