How will the Fediverse navigate the dead internet?

top 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 8 months ago (1 child)

I will disconnect from anything with age verification. My post history and content are more than adequate to prove who I am. I will leave the internet entirely out of ethical disgust. I despise this world of lazy cowards and exploitive criminals. I want nothing to do with it. I will not shrug my shoulders when people come to steal my citizenship, rights, and liberty. Pathetic slaves that roll over to this shit are no better.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Lemmy is going to navigate it by being too small to care about.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I quit Reddit years ago and moved on to the Fediverse...Social media is not of any interest to me.

    I mean, the Fediverse is distributed rather than centralized, but being distributed doesn't make something not social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    No need to nitpick. We are two humans communicating so obviously this is a social activity. A community theater is social media by the loosest definition, but the term "social media" now commonly means the big centralized commercial product platforms of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.

    There are worlds of difference between the manipulative ads and algorithms of social media and the activity feeds on Lemmy. It's the difference between a shopping mall and a community yard sale.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I will never verify my identity for any social platform. Period.

    So if the fediverse enforces as a whole such measures its future would be one without me in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Oh, I won't be verifying my identity, ever. It's basically self-doxxing.

    Or I'll host my own server and mark myself as verified. I mean, does one even verify if an ID check was actually conducted? Who would be bothered to check?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago

    I have no desire to attach my social media activities to my IRL identity. I've seen people attacked and get fired for having strong political beliefs. I myself will not visit businesses whose owners have been vocally supportive of certain viewpoints. So I will not participate anywhere that requires verifiable identity, and I think it will be stifling to the point of losing any value. Plus, I'll be honest, I've been around long enough that I've given voice to thoughts that were immature or ignorant or enraged and I'm damn glad I don't have to defend myself on a daily basis and even happier that they aren't associated with my IRL identity.

    There are ways to establish an identity without personally identifying information, such as how Mastodon verifies that you have control over a domain. That's as far as I'm willing to go.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    Some users will be fine with it, some won't, me included. As for me, I'll just leave any and all instances that will require verification. If all forums start to require verification, I'll just start hosting my own ugly marvelous HTML forum. :D

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It is very likely that smaller communities will form, based on the networks of trust. The local feed will begin to mean more, and local-only communities will proliferate.

    You could still visit the rest of Fediverse, should you need something specific.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Probably go to IRC again, but the fediverse will be fine.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    You can hide from authority, and that's fine, but you still have to grapple with the reality that machines can make very convincing text. Your niche underground software will not shield you from this problem. We need new solutions to adapt to this reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    We need new solutions to adapt to this reality.

    Problem should solve itself once investor capital is no longer flooding into these AI companies and subsidizing the cost of generating that text.

    Once these spammers have to pay the full cost to generate their LLM-generated spam, it will no longer be financially viable for them to do so for so little return. They're only doing it now because it's free or next to free. Having to pay what it actually costs will slow the pervasive AI slop to nearly nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Not entirely, no. But after investor capital dries up, it will become more expensive. So it will only be economically viable if your AI slop spam gains you significant money. And you're not going to get significant money by posting slop spam to Lemmy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • I'm less worried about LLMs pushing products (although finding honest reviews of products has become more difficult with AI and astroturfing), it's their use as propaganda tools for state actors and oligarchs pushing agendas that I'm most worried about. And that's not going away when the bubble pops.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The people who create mastodon having a discussion about what to do about age verification laws some instances may legally be required to comply with isn't the end of the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Time to move servers and restructure ownership

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I think the meeting is more about what, if anything can the mastodon team do to support them. Can they offer a software solution? Do they want to? Etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    I wouldn't mind age or "is a person" verification done with privacy protecting means, such as GNU Taler blind signed token solutions that are open source and audited by independent security teams, but that isn't getting implemented. Instead every "verification" service is a literal privacy nightmare simultaneously linking identity to speech and harvesting user data for sale.

    Non-EU parts of the world should be encouraged to have better data privacy laws as part of their trade deals with the EU.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    In a way I feel this might give us new freedom. I’ve ditched a lot of online stuff over privacy and the amount of time and freedom in your head you get in return is amazing.

    Don’t get me wrong the fediverse is a lifesaver when it comes to staying up to date about the stuff that matters to us (privacy, politics, Linux, ssh,…) so there will have to be some solution.

    But in the bigger picture, fuck it. Read a book.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Read about the first person project! It is litterally aiming to solve personhood credentials and privacy. UX/adoption will be a problem, but it solves some hard issues in a privacy preserving way : https://www.firstperson.network/ - the first user will be the Linux Foundation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Are you sure that this project is about trusting people? One of the first news articles that are linked on this site has this to say:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Yes - this is about having AI agents that can be traced back to a human, and knowing if a persona is a true persona or an AI agent working on behalf of a person with proof of personhood. I urge you to read the whitepaper. AI is part of the reason why this kind of technology is important right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Can instances be hosted abroad instead? Or are host admins liable as long as they're in an age verification required jurisdiction

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    It's a non-issue. They try to verify us, we leave. That's the extent of the conversation.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Die with it i suppose

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Move the fediverse to the gemini protocol?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Instances subject to the legal systems of jurisdictions with age verification laws probably need the feature to exist to continue operating legally.

    I don't think the current structure of any of those laws would require instances to demand verification from other instances, and any instance operator who did such a thing would be socially unacceptable to the current population of the fediverse.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Isn't that kind of like asking a 6 year old what they're going to do when they retire?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    P2P will be back back BACK

    the original fediverse

  • source