He best watch himself. The Supreme Court may just suddenly find that presidents can be held accountable for crimes during their tenure.
post
Shut the fuck up Donnie, you're out of your element.
The amazing thing about this decision by the supreme court is not that it ran against him, but that there still were three judges who ignored the state of law in the US.
Yup.
I can't really feel good about this news because it just shows that the SC is still notably corrupt.
The dissenters were Kavanaugh, Alito, and Thomas.
Seems like that alone explains everything I'd ever need to know about the dissent.
Seppuku is always an option.
A live feed of Trump committing ritual suicide in front of an audience would bring the viewer numbers he always pretends to have, imagine how many people want to see that go down worldwide.
That would be undoubtedly the biggest event in pay per view history
That'd make him a martyr among his idiots, I'm not sure in what way that'd be bad for us in the long run but the good news is the pedo is dead!
There's already a lot of MAGA people convinced that "activist judges" are acting against Trump just to act against Trump... You know, as opposed to ruling against him because he's breaking the law.
Nevermind all those other SCOTUS rulings handing the executive branch more power. Those don't matter. Clearly now it's stacked with activist judges.
I wonder if anyone from MAGA could actually define what "checks and balances" or "separation of powers" means.
I wonder if anyone from MAGA could actually define what "checks and balances" or "separation of powers" means.
I guarantee both would lack self-awareness and instead be defined with a generous sprinkling of "woke", "antifa", or "liberal" in the definition.
Maybe:
"Checks and balances make it so a woke liberal president can't take away our freedom by himself."
I'm sorry, the correct answer is "checks and balances are some lib pussy bullshit they say when they want to put litterboxes in classrooms for furries"
But we would have also accepted "fuck you here's my freedom card to not care (slams a beer while flipping you off)"
The answer is no. Unless there is some mythical honest MAGA they are hiding from us. It is not that they can't properly define things it is they don't want to.
The fighting between them is all smoke and mirrors, imo. This is all part of blitzkrieg policy.
Awww, did widdle Drumpy not get his way?
Someone change his diaper, he’s getting fussy!
I volunteer Stephen Miller for that honor..
So "doing the right thing" and following the law aren't always the same? No way!
Trump promised to use “other alternatives” [...] floated potentially implementing trade embargoes on other nations.
You won't do it, bitchboi. I double dare you.
Of course he will. That new approach will be challenged in court, but will take another 12-18 months for there to be a ruling against it, meanwhile trump will keep using tariffs against our friends and allies further alienating and isolating the United State globally.
Suree, he can put select tariffs back on through other means, but straight up embargoing countries without reason?? Likely it would be the closest he could get to political suicide. I sincerely hope he does it. Show em who's in charge, big guy.
if he openly does things u can call political suicide it means he is not planning on having an open and fair election, believe him when he tells u he does not need votes anymore
Just like all the other “political suicide” shit he’s done consequence free?
I'm not talking about existing embargos stemming from long established US policies, dumbass. And neither is trump.
I'll assume you're referring about Cuba, pretty big difference getting aggressive on that policy vs threatening fresh embargos on allied nations jus cuz.
"Spoiled brat throws a temper tantrum because he didn't get his way"
There fixed the headline.
Breaking “disgusting pedofile child murdering Israeli backed traitor throws public fit because he didn’t get his way”
Does this mean the average Joe's who paid tariffs will get a refund?
Serious question.
This is a big signal that they won't be rubber stamping everything in his agenda. They wanted Barret because she would give them Abortion, no matter what, and she did. But like most criminals, these MAGAs never look beyond their immediate agenda, to the next steps, or the consequences of their behavior.
So now they've got a moral person on the Supreme Court who doesn't seem likely to appease his ugliest demands.
Birthright Citizenship is coming soon, which is expressly allowed in the Constitution, and this ruling seems to indicate that they aren't willing to just ignore the Constitution to earn his favor.
Especially after he attacked them so viciously. They won't forget that.

all 51 comments