all 70 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 81 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That's one jerk every 9 minutes.

I can only imagine the pain in their balls and arm they must've felt after a while.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Their prostate must have looked like a dehydrated pumpkin

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 129 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    I only feel sorry for the Guinness World Record judge

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I just imagine them being very clinical about it. Just standing there with a clicker in one hand and a timer in the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 60 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Professional wankers switch hands every five minutes. It helps to rest each arm each session.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 46 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] 34 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    He must have very soft hands, I'm usually chafed after 6.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there's a whole train of women masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I'm pretty sure 36 cans of Red Bull would kill you. Humans can't handle that much caffeine.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Can't find the Death by Caffeine site (or they changed it) any more, but this one says 5 Red Bulls max per day for a 175lb person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    How do they measure an orgasm?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Implying he would use lotion instead of lube. Fucking amateurs. If you're a frequent wanker and you haven't graduated to real fuckin lube then you're a bit of a joke.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    Fake. 36 red bulls would literally kill a horse, let alone a human, even if they weighed as much as a horse.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Horses die from the dumbest shit tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Lol, can't their stomach's like literally flip upside down and fuck everything up?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I don't know about horses, but this can happen to dogs. The condition is called GDV. It happens without warning, and the only options are emergency surgery (gastropexy) or euthanasia.

    PSA: A gastropexy is MUCH cheaper when done preventatively vs. on an emergency basis. If you get a puppy that is a deep-chested breed, get a gastropexy when spaying/neutering.

    The emergency surgery for my senior retriever mix was $6k+ and a rough (for both of us tbh) recovery. I've known others who have lost their beloved dogs to GDV. It sucks

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Nah .... The info is not 100% conclusive but it's a huge risk to say the least. Still, there is more that does not add up. 36 can's equals 9 Liters (304 US ounce) of red bull .... Try washing down 9 Liters of a super sugary (lightly-) carbonated drink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    The LD50 for caffeine in humans is 150-200mg/kg, so if you weighed only 36kg, that ain't enough caffeine to kill you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

    Go ahead and test those numbers yourself. Report back to us how 20 grams of caffeine goes.

    Meanwhile, those of us that live in reality... https://youtu.be/wj_AOzSSDMM

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    One thing is how you'd feel, another is survivability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine states that LD50 for oral caffeine ingestion in rats is 192ppm, and only estimates the value for humans. Wikipedia doesn't exactly state it but it's safe to assume that the surviving 50% of rats will definitely not have had a good time though.

    But "36 red bulls" is how much? I can buy red bull in 0.25l and 0.5l cans in local stores, what is available in the US in unknown to me, so I'll assume equivalent can sizes. So between 9l and 18l of red bull over about 11hrs. IDK that sounds like a lot of fluid no matter what. Maybe the electrolytes in the red bull will prevent water intoxication, but he'd definitely have had to pee a lot. Perhaps his kidneys would have a hard time following along with the excess electrolytes, but enough to become hypertonic?

    Anyway a liter of red bull contains 320mg of caffeine, and thus 9l is 2.88g and 18l is 5.76g. Assuming a 100kg human body that's 28.8-57.6ppm spread out over 11hrs.

    Had the caffeine been ingested all at once, then he'd at worst have hit 30% of LD50. But given that the subject probably didn't ingest 18l of fluid instantly, because then the story would include that in the title, the consumption was spread out. Elimination half-life for caffeine is 3-7hrs, meaning that the initial caffeine could be reduced to 1/8 by the end.

    I don't have the time to do the integral equations, but my best bet is that our subject plausibly could survive, but his kidneys, penis and psychiatric state could do with a check up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    People regularly die on less than 2g caffeine intake in a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Yes, there's always going to be outliers, that's how statistics work. That LD50 is 192mg/kg just means that 50% will have died by that point. Some individuals can survive beyond that point, while 50% couldn't.

    I'm not saying that 50% of the population will be honky dory a-ok after surviving, what killed the first half. Just that it's not unlikely that you could survive consuming 18l of red bull over the course of 10h23m. You'd probably still be pretty fucked up, but surviving is a subset of being fucked up, not the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    My point is the LD50 is much lower than 192mg/kg. Even a middleschooler could observe that much...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    My point is the LD50 is much lower than 192mg/kg. Even a middleschooler could observe that much...

    Are you trolling or do you genuinely not understand basic medical terminology or statistics?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Are you dumb enough to think mice are a perfect representation of humans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    And claiming that the story is fake because "36 red bulls would literally kill a horse" is just plain old hyperbole.

    While I'm not big on equine nephrology, or veteranary physiology in general even, I suppose that it's reasonable to assume, that not 100% of horses would survive ingesting the caffeine equivalent of 14l of coffee at once. But going from "some horses would die from this" to "this story is definitely fake" is just bad reasoning.

    Sure, it's reasonable to question the story, but dismissing it because a horse couldn't do the same? WTF?

    Not every horse, human, or humpback whale would survive consuming 36 red bulls. But it's not unreasonable to assume that a majority of humans would survive.

    Personally I want to believe the story, if for nothing else than it's not a story about how the world is going to shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    2 short of true headline greatness.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    I can't find the news article, so this might be fake. But I did find this.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I bet he didn't even use Margaret Thatcher's Boner Smasher.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    He could have easily hit 80 if he was drinking C4.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    In west Philadelphia born and raised…

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I'd be afraid my dick would explode

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Did not know you could die doing that...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Are they taking his word for it or did somebody watch to verify?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The arch-gooner

  • source