Context

Alberta is a conservative Canadian province that is rich because they extract a lot of oil. The Alberta Government opposes all measures that could reduce oil-production or oil consumption.

For instance, when the Canadian Federal Government tried to take measures to reduce plastics pollution, the Alberta Government publically protested.

Calgary is the largest city in Alberta. The city has a traffic violence problem. Data shows it has the worse road deaths and injuries rate of any major Canadian city.

Jyoti Gondek, the Mayor of Calgary, recently suggested building more safe bike lanes to reduce car dependency. A few days later, her office received this warning letter

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 1 year ago*

Dear Mx Dreeshen,

In regards to your last letter, I believe I wholeheartedly understand your concerns.

Your letter helped open my eyes to the error in our plans for the city and thus we shall no longer proceed to install our planned dedicated bicycle lanes.

You are correct that we must deal with the increasing demand for access to our great city.

Therefore we shall be announcing vast improvements to our road structure in the form of increased public transport services, dedicated bus-only routes, additional pedestrianised streets in major shopping areas, and even a couple of tram routes, on top of the bicycle lanes laid out in our original plan - all thanks to your wonderful letter!

Get wrecked you spineless automotive shill.

With love,

Jyoti Gondek

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    I hope she crumpled it up, then reconsidered, uncrumpled, took the photo, and then presumably recrumpled it before throwing it away.

    Edit: Regendered

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 139 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is not mildly infuriating but an example of extreme stupidity or, more likely, the result of corruption.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As if increasing bicycle throughput isn’t increasing vehicle throughput. They’re vehicles, and can probably achieve a higher passenger density than individual cars can on a city street.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No ,no, the letter specifically singles out motor vehicles. Burning gas is the point. This letter has nothing to do with transporting people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    The Paris evidence is right there for anyone to look at. Everything works, people get to where they need to be on time, AND the air toxicity has plummeted year on year. Excess and avaoidable deaths reduced.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    Wipe your ass with that.

    As demonstrated in Montreal, Toronto, Paris (France), Netherlands (pick any city), Berlin, San Francisco, and every other place that takes transportation seriously, you have to degrow car-centric infrastructure to build people moving infrastructure, including bike lanes.

    The growing urban population needs to find more sustainable ways to get around, because you can never satisfy car-centric infrastructure. "One more lane, bro" isn't an actual solution to anything.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mayor should write back, "Thanks for the letter." And then continue according to plan.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Can we stop putting actually infuriating political BS in the lighthearted c/mildlyinfuriating?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    They won't stop, lemmy now is 80% politics. Yet they complaining about dead niche communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Isn’t the world 80% politics these days?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    alwayshasbeen.jpg

    Life is politics, people enjoy trying to make this clean divisible line between "talking politics" and everything else but that line is non-existent.

    Politics touches everything we do and interact with. Literally name anything and there will be some sort of rules and laws around it that impact whatever the topic of discussion is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Shameful. Must have been a nice bribe!

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It’s almost like being a conservative makes you a shitty and evil person and you fuck up wherever you are at.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Based on this I can only imagine they must have full throated support of the green line which would reduce intra-city traffic to allow for greater available capacity for provincial traffic.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They could use the inside lane of the four lanes on 4th Ave for a bike lane and a lot of their traffic problem would be gone without anyone missing anything. That would be constructive w/o construction tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Politicians sponsored by the fossil lobby are the norm, even outside pressure from USA (via ambassadors, state visits, bilateral agreements and extortions, or again lobbyists) is normal.

    It's present all over Europe as well tho it's (gotten?) weaker.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    For Lemmings from other areas, it doesn't read like a warning, exactly, but in the context of what the Alberta government literally this minster has been doing it kind of is.

    Edit: Didn't notice this is signed Devin Dreeshen.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Let's read this study about how adding more lanes and roads just makes more congestion, not less and how car alternatives are needed for the future of transportation to arrive. Like, oh I don't know, Bike lanes and increased Public Transit infrastructure. Now, let's throw it in the Garbage and go back to what we've been doing unsuccessfully for the past 75 years.

    • This Guy ☝️
  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Dishonorable Devin Dreeshen.

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Such kneejerk.

    WHAT DOES THE MATH SAY?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    I assume that it's legal to ride a gasoline-fueled moped in the bike lane. Does this make everyone happy?

  • source
  • 24 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 78 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Dreeshen (author of the letter) previously worked on the Trump campaign, though lately he seems not to want to talk about that....

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t he understands what road capacity actually entails. The space for a car vs the space for a bike. Bikes win the density game

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Ah but you see, cars are the only viable modern transit so we made our model not count bike trips as valid trips and also made our models assume no one will be biking for the next 20 years cause as we keep adding car lanes and increasing lane number and car speeds, cyclists have been decreasing. We also made sure to not even include existing bike routes in our transportation model.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Idiots like that only see in terms of volume rather than people moved.

    So seeing a traffic jam, which might only have a hundred cars, is like a wet dream to them compared to seeing a thousand cyclists in half the amount of space.

    It's disturbing that somebody like that could even be in any position of power, let alone ministry of transportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    You can't maintain or expand road capacity as populations grow. It doesn't work. Bigger roads means more cars means bigger roads means more cars, it's an endless and pointless cycle.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The government of Alberta currently has something like 6 open corruption investigation ongoing.

    That's after they changed multiple laws to weasle their way out of at least 2 more blatant corruption scandals

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Minister of Transportation doing his best to be in conflict of interest by way of lobby groups.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Did they make a paper air plane out of that letter? The creases look like it

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Just one more lane bro. I promise bro just one more lane and it'll fix everything bro. Bro, just one more lane. Please just one more, one more lane and we can fix this whole problem bro, bro c’mon just give me one more lane, I promise bro, bro bro please! Just need one more lane

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Interesting folds on that sheet of paper. Somebody showed their respect by making a paper airplane out of it?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Her Worship

    Is that a real title or sarcasm? It's hard to tell when the state regularly uses these kind of absurd clown titles (eg. her honor).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The city is facing the worse

    I think you mean "worst"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Please don't meet with this person. From this letter alone I assume he doesn't understand traffic or is, possibly, lying... Which is very unlikely, I am sure.

  • source
  • so when is the public burning event?

  • source