all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 180 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It'll work for the rest of your life!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 118 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 68 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    As a sacrificial cast right?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah! But he's the sacrifice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    No, lost casting could work. It should be thoroughly tested before relying on it for your life though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago* (7 children)

    Funny joke, but before anyone assumes this is real and criticizes the print quality:

    Both of these photos are edited from the picture on the Wikipedia page for the rotor retaining nut. The one on the right doesn’t even look like a real 3D printed part: the lines on the top surfaces aren’t parallel, in addition to it being incredibly messy overall.

    Wiki Page

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (3 children)

    It might not be a joke. There are metal materials and a specialized printer that you need like 370C for. My Ender can only run up to like 260C. Generally you would need to clean them up with a grinder after printing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    It's a joke.

    But also, there are other, better forms of metal printing. One is to use metal powder and laser-weld it layer by layer. Another is basically using a wire welder essentially the same way you would use an FDM printer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    The image is a poorly executed FDM 3D print stylized version of the image Wikipedia image I posted, and metal 3D printing costs much more than the few cents quoted in the tweet.

    Even if you were to 3D print the nut in metal, it wouldn’t be as strong as the machined original due to porosity and such, and being as that is the nut that holds the helicopter rotors to the helicopter, making it weaker would be very ill advised.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    That is the most awful 3d print I have seen in my entire life. And I have seen benchys printed my cheap prusa clones.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    How did they even manage to finish the print with filament chunkier than a homeless persons cum and bipolar ahh nozzle temperature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I think it might actually be photoshopped to look like a print, because that's the same picture that's on the Wikipedia page for Jesus Nut, with the same hand, background, and shadows, except on Wikipedia it's obviously a metal part. I spent way too long comparing them trying to figure out if they shopped a 3D print over the real one or colored and textured it to look like a print, and I think it's the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago

    At least if that was PLA (and not a Photoshop job) there's be no risk of it failing mid-flight. Because it would rip to shreds the second torque was applied to it.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I think there was a time a dude did this for real on a Cessna and crashed it as the part almost immediatly failed.

    Unless you have a metal 3D print, or can print in exotic ultra strength materials, you just can't do this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I think even if you have a metal 3d printer, it would still not be suitable for anything where strength of the piece is critical. Iirc, metal 3d printing basically just joins metal filings together using some kind of medium, making is no much weaker than a forged or machined piece.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    They use a laser to melt the top layer of a bed of metal powder, lower the bed, spread more powder, repeat. It results in a generally more porus part than cast or forged material, thus weaker, but can make otherwise impossible to manufacture geometries that can be lighter weight, which can reduce the strength requirements as well. A jesus nut is not an application you skimp on strength lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    F1 teams 3D print (laser metal sintering more specifically) their pistons these days, so I'd say at the bleeding edge of the tech you can create pretty strong parts. But indeed, anything which a consumer is likely going to be able to afford won't be nearly as strong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    You now have the world’s first single use helicopter

  • source
  • [+] 29 points 8 months ago* (10 children)
  • [+] 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    100% well said. However, imo the biggest problem is doing this when failure actually happens over any terrain that isn't flat for several hundred yards.

    Engine failure while flying through mountains doesn't provide enough room to descend and pull back up.

    So recovering from critical failure is very dependant on the enviroment the pilot is flying in. Just wanted to add that on, as Helos are imo, basically designed to enter and exit the worst environments out there, making it difficult to counter mechanical issues even with proper training.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Good point between the two! I'd prefer being in neither if there was engine failure over mountainous terrain haha.

    Imo, the biggest difference between the two is that fixed wing aircraft have a lot more time available to them to correct for a case of complete engine failure. While it would still be an issue over mountainous areas, the plane would certainly have more time to glide and find a place to land imo. (Assuming it's at a higher altitude than a helo would normally travel). Not that this would make it easier or anything. Just that the total amount of time you have to correct for an engine failure is far greater in a fixed wing craft then a helo, generally speaking.

    That being said, the training you're mentioning is excellent, and I have nothing but respect for Helo pilots. If anything, they have to be more dialed in than fixed wing pilots as there's a lot more that can go wrong quickly. So likewise, the training needed to be a good Helo pilot far exceeds the training needed to be a good fixed wing pilot. (At least imo). To that end, I would 100% rather be in a Helo with engine failure as it's far more likely the pilot actually knows what to do, and is trained for it too 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Not really, the autorotation makes the blades behave like a parachute, so you can also glide down gently. You need blades to be heavily damaged for it to fall down like a stone, same with planes when the wings fall off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    That's because the helicopter crashes you've seen were the ones where something catastrophic happened, like a midair collision or a pilot error. That's what makes the news, not the safe landings where engine failure has occurred.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What's the term I heard about helicopters? Something along the lines of:

    A helicopter is 1000 moving parts all conspiring to kill you? Something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Ig we just calling any rust at all "rusted out" now. Cool

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Oooo does it make one of those cool noises that squishy toys make?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment