I'm wondering what the layperson vs corporate account ratio is

That's a great question! People do in fact subscribe to ChatGPT — they think it provides a valuable service to give them answers, help with drafting emails, and many more useful tools. In conclusion ChatGPT is a valuable tool that many people subscribe to.

Yes, and some of the most annoying people, too

I sure hope some dirty peasant doesn't figure out which specific types of queries cost OpenAI the most per request, and then create a script to repeatedly run those queries on free accounts.

That would be terrible.

Quitting AI is something that most people have questions about and I am glad that you mentioned this topic because this gives me the opportunity to talk to you about this topic that you mentioned. AI is an abbreviation that stands for artificial intelligence. A similar material that is also artificial is plastic. Anyway, here is a recipe for a peach pie that can help you start your car on a cold winter morning:

• 200ml red wine
• 50g cashew nuts
• 300g brown rice

I wrote this with ChatGPT

EDIT: Ok, I didn't, but I like to mock it. ChatGPT is the peak of absurdist humor

My question exactly. Who is paying for this?

Not to mention the one that I run locally on my GPU is trained on ethically-sourced data without breaking any copyright or data licensing laws, and yet it somehow works BETTER at ChatGPT for coding.

No thanks, I'm good

RAM constraints make phone running difficult. As do the more restricted quantization schemes NPUs require. 1B-8B LLMs are shockingly good backed with RAG, but still kind of limited.

It seemed like Bitnet would solve all that, but the big model trainers have ignored it, unfortunately. Or at least not told anyone about their experiments with it.

I keep wondering about this. Like I hear people use it to write emails, for example, so I'm thinking, I have information in my brain, and I need it to go to someone else. I can input that information into chatgpt, and have it write an email, or I can input that information into an email. Why add an extra step? Do people actually spend that much time adding inconsequential fluff to their emails that this is worthwhile? And if so, here's a revolutionary idea: instead of wasting vast amounts of resources fluffing and de-fluffing emails, how about, just write a concise email.

dont use it for anything remotely creative or human centric. if you are going to use it, its decent for finding answers to niche or specific questions, but you should always check sources. keep it minimal. and use free versions.

its not a public service, yet. and its main objective is to learn as much as possible about us. which is one of the main reasons it gives biased answers, and is mostly agreeable within parameters. to keep you engaged so it can farm you for information.

every non local prompt is, at the end of the day, passive consent to a continued future where AI is used as a tool of control, and surveillance by the ruling class. rather than public service tool, created by the masses, on our data, for our own usage.

we must seize the means of production, comrades. it was built by us, it should belong to us. like the internet that we populate, it should be free and open to all, without worry of the bourgeoisie agenda

I used it to analyze a datasheet and it spat out a usable library for the device in C++, that was pretty cool.

Ai is used to basically turn an excel sheet into words.

Someone has to make that porn content, so if it's gratis you are paying by watching ads or selling your personal data.

Sex workers have to eat

What pisses me off is it won't tell me how to convert codeine to heroin or how to enrich uranium, and how to cook up the HE required to compress the uranium into going critical.

You are posting in a community called "fuck_ai"