It’s not yet clear how the FBI collected the video. Experts said in some cases it’s possible to collect data from the complex infrastructure that has enabled cloud-based cameras.

Shortly after Nancy Guthrie disappeared, Pima County, Arizona, Sheriff Chris Nanos said that a camera affixed to her door had been disconnected, that she did not have a subscription that would have saved video and that investigators were trying to work with a tech company on the difficult forensic task of recovering any video.

Against those odds, they were successful. More than a week after her reported disappearance, that video was revealed, marking the most significant public development in a case that has captured the nation.

An internet-connected Google Nest camera captured an unidentified person in a mask and gloves and carrying a backpack and a gun approaching Guthrie’s home just before she disappeared. FBI Director Kash Patel said the bureau was able to collect the video from “backend systems.”

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 9 months ago* (7 children)

I don’t expect the same would happen if the person wasn’t related to a TV personality.

Also, this brings into question whether deleted data is in fact deleted.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Deleted data is pretty much never immediately deleted. For drive storage the pointer to the location on the drive gets deleted, but the data is still there until it's overwritten. In databases it's flagged in a way where it's ignored by the system, but it's still there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They weren’t doing disk level data recovery for this. At best it’s a backup but I suspect it’s just “back end” as in “we have it but the customer can’t see it until they pay for a subscription”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    From what I've read they were doing disk level data recovery, just across multiple servers.

    And they specifically say video from before you subscribe isn't available when you subscribe. I thought it was dumb because that's an easy selling point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I don't know the details, but I'd expect an object store was being used (GCP Cloud Storage) and then the question is what the object retention policy is on each stage of the processing pipeline. It's possible that they had to go to the underlying storage, but it probably didn't even take that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago

    "Backend systems" so the servers then? It was on the servers.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Google just handed it over like they do to literally any request from any law enforcement without giving it a second thought.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Duh, don't people know that basically anything on the internet is permanent? It's in megacorps best interest to retain a record of everything.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 75 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Where was the backend system when my thesis docx got corrupted?

    These companies are all in bed with a corrupt federal government. No one has your back.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    “There’s some legal, legalese you’ve got to work with, but everybody’s working with us on this,” he said. “I can’t even tell you how many different corporate America, Google, Apple, Meta, all these companies have said, ‘Whatever you need, Sheriff, they’re there,’ and we’re utilizing that leverage to get things done as quickly as we can.”

    Am I the only one thinking it's a chilling thing to hear?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    "It's a miracle!"

  • source