It’s in literally all processed foods.

The linked Healthy Florida First page gives measurements found but nowhere suggests what a reasonable limit is. The dose is the poison, people.

Imagine if they just published arsenic levels found in various fish but gave no context.

I wrote the above, and then I checked their site. They only have 3 categories, and arsenic is in the candy one. They give the safe consumption limit there. I guess they're implying no level of glyphosate is safe?

Prioritize Nutrition as the Root Cause of Chronic Diseases

That's a weird goal. Do you think they just didn't proof read it?

theres at least 48 weeds species that are resistance to glyphosphate, only matter of time that becomes more species, grasses, horseweed, russian thistle are notable ones.

This is a big contributor to why cancer rates are elevated in Iowa. Lots of farm land means lots of chemicals sprayed. Fortunately our fearless governor, Kim Reynolds, and her band of merry assholes are trying to protect Monsanto from legal liability by making it illegal to sue them. It passed in the Senate but failed to get back through the house... So far. Not for lack of trying from Beyer and the aformentioned conservative ill running the state.

The supposed HFF website does not state their exact findings, nor have a scientific paper regarding their findings, nor have any sort of transparency like who's even operating and funding the website.

There is a link to a form supposedly allowing anyone to report about "bad" food, but that's suspicious.

Domain name is about 34 days old. https://whois.domaintools.com/exposingfoodtoxins.com

Very sketchy.

"Thing found" is very different from "dangerous levels of thing found".

Yeah - I know you think that "there is no safe level" but that's not true.

Also - "probably carcinogenic" is a pretty low bar for the WHO. See also "cooked meat" for things that are "probably carcinogenic".

So this is based on numbers from the same site that was putting out the arsenic levels in candy that was like 100x higher than the WHO numbers? The ones that said you could only have like 240 tiny Nerds per year?

At this point I’m more skeptical of what agenda is trying to be pushed from these tbh, because I’m not seeing any methodology to support any of these findings.

It's how I quit smoking.

Florida Man for the win?