top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hold the door if someone is right behind you.

Unless you're entering a secure location, in which case don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    You missed one: don't use ai to generate images.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I think as far as etiquette goes, I would say: don't paste me unfiltered AI output. If it's not worth your effort to at least summarize that wall of slop, it's not worth my effort to read it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    No one taught you this? Even if nobody sits you down for a lesson, you are taught by example by the people around you when you grow up.

    Also, the tipping and keeping doors open for people behind you are not universally applicable. In large swaths of Asia you'll be met by ire or confusion respectively. So maybe this is missing a generated image for being culturally sensitive.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Not disagreeing with what you’re saying here but it seems to assume that everyone is able to understand unspoken etiquette, which unfortunately isn’t the case.

    For example, for myself, I hadn’t ever learned about a bunch of these (such as the waiting for other people to exit the elevator/doorway before entering, as well as the acknowledging staff one,) since I barely see them in action nor really concentrate deliberately on them, and it doesn’t help the fact I’m quite likely autistic.

    Frankly, it’d be great if I was sat down and told about each of these things early on, it would’ve saved me from many years of confusion, conflict and anxiety, and it would’ve prevented me from thinking the reason I don’t fit in is exclusively my fault and I should pay for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I frankly don't believe that this guide alone would have solved as many issues for you as it would also cause. What is presented as universal wisdom is never that simple. The "nobody taught you" aspect is not universally true. I counted ten items in the list I was taught in school or by my parents. I'm not the center of the universe but we can extrapolate that some people have been taught some of these things in some setting. So there is already a mistake in the headline.

    This "cool guide" is either redundant (letting people exit a place or the elevator first are roughly the same thing) or not specific enough (letting people exit buses and trains etc. before you enter is missing). You should also offer your chair or seat to those who need it more than you (e.g. pregnant, old, or injured people). You don't have to offer a replacement date if you cancel an appointment if you canceled in the first place because you don't want to hang out with an asshole. You don't need to clean up a mess you made while running outside while the house is on fire. There will be instances where you don't need to return a borrowed item in the same or better condition than when you borrowed it. If I lended you my dirty lawnmower I would not expect you to clean it or sharpen its blades before you returned it. The additional wear and tear is factored in already.

    This poster gives the impression to contain simple, universal, virtuous truths. But none of them are always simple or always logical. They are at best a patchy guideline missing even more unarticulated conditions and exceptions that render them useless. And if you aren't aware of the missing bits, you'll still have awkward social interactions.

    My suspicion is that somebody created a list of things they thought was the epitome of wisdom in general social interactions, in the US and not in a city with public transport options. They possibly used so-called AI to compile this list. It's even more likely that they used it to design the poster and to draw the little pictures. And then posted it online to be praised for their effort (don't aura farm ought to be a bullet point on this poster as well). It deserves to be criticized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yeah, this list was pretty vague honestly, I gotta agree on that front. And yeah, some of these were things I was taught by parents and peers, although that said, I don’t believe I was taught in primary school (or elementary school if that’s easier to understand) about really any of these, since the education system where I live is pretty permissive for what happens in kindergarten, primary school and middle school, but excessively strict in high school for some reason. Although, I do believe I was taught a bunch in kindergarten, but that was so long ago I barely remember anything apart from some kid who pushed me over for no reason lol.

    Also yeah, the US-defaultism of this “cool guide” doesn’t really help either, especially as you mentioned, with the lack of public transport etiquette and the insistence on tipping.

    There’s also the fact that for something like public transport, or even just doorways in general, exiting and entering is different based on the area and context. Such as where I live, where people on public transport take one side when entering, and the other side exits at the same time, whereas in store doorways for instance, if it’s wide enough it’s the same, but if it’s narrow enough people would need to wait their turn.

    Overall, after having a thought about this “guide”, it’s generally low quality and biased, I’d rather just exert more energy trying to understand the etiquette of my peers rather than look at a guide like this unless it’s actually meaningful and specific.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Please don't cover your mouth when you cough with your hands. Please don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Just to clarify, the suggestion here is to use the crook of your elbow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I mean it was a better solution than coughing openly into a group you are talking to, assuming you'd wash your hands afterward; but being in a men's bathroom, guys using the urinal or bowl just walk out without washing hands, so there is that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    Your parents. Your parents are expected to teach you these.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    To hell with your tipping culture

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    If no one taught you a good majority of these: What the hell did your parents teach you?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (1 child)
    1. How is this a guide for adults?? I knew most of these before I became an adult.
    2. These ought to be taught by parents and other adults which are important in the child’s life, and backed up by demonstrations by example. Parents have a duty to demonstrate correct behaviours themselves, and reinforce those behaviours in their children.
    3. The shopping cart one ought to be extended to “if you pick something up in the store and don’t want it, put it back where you got it from”. I see far too much perishable frozen/refrigerated goods stuffed elsewhere on a shelf and dethawing to unsaleability because people changed their minds and couldn’t be arsed to put it back where it came from.
    4. For the “cover your mouth” one - please, for the love of Pete, learn the difference between a cough and a clearing of the throat. They are not the same damn thing.
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I never knew the let people exit first because I never lived anywhere with public transit. It's obvious if someone brings any attention to it but in my head getting on the subway the first few times I was like "why are people running into me what is happening" lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago

    I live in a country where tipping isn’t a thing, and nobody here wants it to be a thing. And American tourists come over and can’t comprehend not tipping so they tip anyway because they think we’re just being mean to each other and that we all want tipping to be a thing.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Are you claiming this posted content to be AI generated or that we should 'Fuck AI slop' as a etiquette?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I blows my mind how many adults don't know this. The way I was raised, I'd be embarrassed to get in someone's way as they tried to exit an elevator. But I was also taught that common decency is a good thing and we've clearly given up on that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    But I was also taught that common decency is a good thing

    Funny, I never saw it as a decency thing, more utilitarian. It's a waste of effort to try to cram myself into an already occupied box (unless there are occupants staying in the box, of course).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's wild when I see people just shove onto an elevator like my dude. The hell. Why. And they get mad when we're all annoyed at them!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    At an airport there was a long wait and elevator was packed. My father in law and kids all got in, and now it's full then it goes to next floor and more people cram in. Now it is over stuffed. Goes to another floor and my father-in-law was fed up, when the doors opened he shoved the front people out and said this is where you get off and hit door close. They were saying "hey this isn't my floor".

    Poor etiquette on both sides but still makes me laugh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago

    Your parents failed you if they didn't teach at least half of these, Christ.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You cover your mouth with your hand when you cough, but you don't cover your ass when you fart. Curious.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Entire poster could be summarised as: treat other people with respect and empathy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    That's a bit of the problem these days though; younger generations are not taught what concrete actions are deemed respectful. Furthermore it's viewed as a personal inconvenience for the sake of strangers.

    "Common sense is not that common."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    eye contact

    No thank you

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Don't look in my eyes. Fuck that don't even look at me if you can help it and I'll return the favor

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "no one" teaches you to sneeze in the elbow?? What do you teach kids at all then?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    When a lot of today's parents fail to teach their kids all these things... But to. Hell with the tipping

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Why is there a separate one for exiting an elevator when there's one for exiting rooms below? Same principle

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago*

    Im pretty sure a lot of these are taught by parents and cultural osmosis, at least where I live.

    Edit: The pandemic definately tried to teach people to cover their face holes while sneezing or coughing

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Nice post! I don't know how many are or aren't taught these things, as I feel like I was taught most of these myself. I do have some opinions though:

    • Tipping I feel like is a thing very pertained to the US, and shouldn't be considered "good etiquette", but rather altruistic. I.e. no pressure to give tips. Same with the car, but it should still be returned "in an equal or better condition" if possible.
      Etiquette is not dependent on economic power.
    • Being loud in general is bad etiquette/uncivilized, so the three about loud music, speakerphone, and loudness in quiet public places could be a single entry.
    • Other duplicates: "let others exit first" and "clean up".
    • The coughing shows a graphic of holding the hand in front of the mouth, which should instead be the elbow because of simple hygiene.
    • The part about commenting on someone's food is a bit weird, as it could be extended to "don't share your opinion about my choices unless I ask". Thoughts?
    • I really like the modern inclusion of putting away your phone during conversations!
    • Things that could be added:
      • Value others' time; be on time, and don't be in the way of those with little time.
      • Do the small things yourself, regardless of whose responsibility it is (like pick up something from the floor).
      • Give space when there is space. E.g. walking on the sidewalk, shopping cart in aisle, personal space in the queue, etc.
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Commenting on other people's food is very common around here. Maybe it's more appropriate to say "don't content negatively on other people's food"? Or better yet, "don't comment negatively on anything unprompted".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I actually really like the “give space when there is space” one you mentioned, since when I’m at supermarkets, I routinely see people’s carts at crooked angles or almost in the middle of the aisle, stopping me from passing through, and I make sure to adjust my cart all the time, since I don’t wanna waste anyone’s time or deplete their energy trying to fit through. I also get thanked for it a lot, so that’s nice too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    My mom taught me all of these, other then the phone ones bcauee cell phones didn't exist back then.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Don't shit on the floor, and if you do, make sure to clean it up. #lifehacks

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I thought most of those things were the standard 

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Big fat no on the tipping. Tipping should be outlawed altogether, start paying your employees a decent wage instead!

    Also do comment on people's food choices as long as it is positive. "That looks awesome, I would LOVE some >insert nice food here< for myself next time!" I would maybe change that one to just "Don't criticize people for their decisions that do not affect you" or something like that

    No virtue signalling intended but I'm happy to say that I do all the rest of these things, are those things not normal to do anyway?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Lot of people here saying they disagree with the tipping one. But you must surely admit that it is everyday etiquette in Canada. This guide is not for what's ethical -- after all, it is ethical to harangue somebody about their unethical dietary decisions -- it's to teach you what to do so that you fit in to this society better.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Where does this guide state anything about Canada ? In Northern Europe its seen as an insult to tip your waiter. Just pay your workers a living wage instead of hoping for the customers gratitude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • You shouldn't have to be taught any of these. All these are just tacit behavior you pick up automatically if you're around decent folk.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (25 children)

    I see a lot of comments dismissing the information because of it use of AI for the graphics. Would it have been received better if the post was simply a list of bullet points? I couldn't do graphics if my life depended on it, but I still feel this presentation is easier to digest and process than it'd be if it was plain text, so I'd probably go the same route of using AI to better convey what I'm trying to.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (21 children)

    Do you think the only choices are AI art or not?

    Whoever "made" this could have easily used the plethora of media freely available to them, pre-made by human artists, for each point in this. Clipart is decades old.

    Or they could absolutely ditch the artwork and choose a different way to present this! The de-google guides that always pop up rarely have images. It's all simple shapes that are easy to read and look at.

    There is absolutely zero need for AI here.

    I couldn't do graphics if my life depended on it

    Yes you can, you just don't want to put in the effort. Get drawing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (20 children)

    So if I'm understanding correctly, the vox populi is that any AI-generated image is automatically bad/slop/misuse? Are we satanizing AI now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (19 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (18 children)

    That seems a very narrow and binary perspective. There's no room for nuance, it's simply "AI is bad and we won't talk further about it".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    AI is being forced into EVERYONE'S lives, whether we want it or not, and to make that happen; land and ecosystems are being destroyed, people's lives are being upended, resources are being made more expensive and less obtainable for everyday people, people's creations are being stolen and morphed into this machine that erases any nuance, self-expression, or human connection, while disconnecting people that enjoy art from those that pour their heart and soul into creating it.

    AI IS bad, and no that fact is not up for discussion/debate. Every use of AI is detrimental to human expression and connection, while further harming the world/environment we all exist in. We've done enough harm as a species.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (10 children)

    But then we have a problem with AI's process, not the underlying technology. What I mean to say is, if I were to train and run my own model in an isolated local computer, using ethically sourced* training material, then would it still be bad? Like, are we mad at the means needed to make the technology work or simply at the technology? Because if it's the former, then we can do something about it. Agriculture is a hell of a technology, but there are very detrimental ways to apply it.

    *Let's gloss over what ethically sourced really means for the sake of discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Sure, if you built an AI on your own machine, trained it entirely on public commons and voluntarily obtained data with the active consent, and powered it entirely on solar power and wind turbines, to do jobs without intrinsic value to human development, people would have a lot fewer objections to it. But you didn't. And you won't, because it would take resources that exceed anything you have available to do so. Much like genetic modification, there are motives and methods that potentially have real value, but they don't tend to have significant return on investment and so are simply not done, and what is done ranges from suspect to objectively exploitative. You cannot create an ethical AI in the current environment, if such a thing is even possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    It may very well be the former; but I don't believe 'ethically trained' and 'useful' is an achievable combination in AI models, particularly within our capitalist world/society.

    Even if such a thing was created; it'd be impossible to verify and distinguish among the flood of media produced by those that just don't care about the broader picture and those effected. The detrimental effects of global AI infrastructure has greatly overshadowed the potential for 'ethical' AI implementation; and now we just don't have the means to sort through 'ethical' vs not, leaving no option but to reject it outright.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    You can't train your own though. You can't make your own AI that knows what a cat or Picasso is without it using works that are not yours. You'd never be able to tell it to write you a novel because it wouldn't have any to work with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    But if I write a novel, am I not also taking into account every novel I've ever read? Can you draw something without first looking at other drawings?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    AI is not sentient and cannot learn or read. It regurgitates a "best guess" and knows nothing. If you use drawing tools to make shapes in Paint, congratulations! You made art, not the computer. If you write the shittiest fanfic in the world, YOU made it, YOU adapted your experiences into your own work.

    AI does not and never will do it. Stop defending it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    You moved the goal post. I thought the problem was using other things as references for the creation process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Why are you fighting so hard to defend AI slop? There was never an issue with anyone using references. The issue is stealing and regurgitating other people's works and destroying the environment in the process. I'm sorry if that is too advanced for you, as I'm not the first to tell you this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    When the ad hominem attacks start, it's time to drop it. Than you for the civil discussion while it lasted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Apologies, I'm trying to do this while also feeding a very fussy newborn.

    I'll instead be an adult and say that I don't want to continue this discussion. I have better things to do, and you're getting pedantic about what defines "art". It's a lose-lose situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    From the perspective of art, explain to me how it can start as good from the get go or a benefit that's not just I can be lazy? It's built on theft of countless artists let alone the overall waste it produces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Before going into the art part of your comment, in curious, why is being lazy an undesirable thing? What constitutes lazy? At which point does one stop "being lazy" and become "just using the available tools"? Is writing in a computer and then printing it just laziness as opposed to writing it by hand? What if instead of using a pencil I use a raw graphite piece? Is using a pencil lazy? Or is it something else we're criticising here? Are we mad at the lack of creative effort? How effortless can something be before it becomes worthless?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    If saying it's "lazy" really hurts you that much then sorry. My point is that, and your example is actually perfect, if I stencil or photoshop 1, 2 maybe 3 into a single art at the least I have put time and effort into it. There's intent behind it and let's say hypothetically I then went around saying hey, look at my effort and what I created initially you can see the inspiration assuming proper credit is given. If I then go and try to sell it or take full credit then EVERYONE knows it's source and can scrutinize it since now money and/or reputation is involved.

    Now go to AI all LLM bar none are unethical or at least dubious in nature when it comes to what I described due to its black box like behavior. Now tell me as a layman making the millionth Ghibli "art" it does two things. Normalize and dilute the original and then commodify and create extremely stringent rules on sourcing without AI. Basically like how deepfakes and the likes are, which is definitely another VERY inexcusable and utterly garbage side effect. And for high visibility stuff like Ghibli, at least you know what's up but the silent and even more painful side is the damage done on the smaller scale artists as AI "artists" flood the market without a care to make a quick buck. Collages, Photoshop and the likes exist for those less artistically gifted (I can't draw either btw) that still left a semblance of human effort but even that is now gone.

    So no it doesn't matter the materialistic nature (graphite vs digital), it is the human side of it, the intent. If you tell me that that's not what I consider lazy or more kindly, opportunistic and only that then tell me what's been good so far. For every 1 break through in health or astronomy for the greater good, there are 10x or more number of societal issues that crop up due to it as we continue to feel the pain with no solution in sight.

    Assuming you actually read and understand what I say and not just not pick words that might feel too blunt to you, tell me about your art part of my comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Your question was specific to AI images, not AI in general. There's plenty of nuance to be had with AI, but art is one thing it should never do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    This was the same argument when cameras were invented, and artists moved to abstract and impressionist movement since realism in art couldn't compete with photography. Then we had the same with manual graphic artist moving to digital vector software.

    AI is not going away. Does it suck ass for artists: yes. Does it allow non artists to convey visual ideas they never could or could afford: also yes.

    I hate AI when used like this, I think all AI effort should be human disease gene modeling, or other public benefits. But capitalism says no.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Ok, that makes sense. So what constitutes art? Is any kind of graphical depiction art? Are we banning computers from making drawings? Or just AI? How different is it from using the drawing tools in MS Paint to help me achieve a nice rectangle or a perfect circle? Something I would be unable to do by free hand drawing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    I'm thinking this through, myself.

    • there are people, companies, and systems that are making the world a worse place, though people may disagree on exactly what/who those are.
    • a fair number of people on Lemmy/Piefed believe that GenAI as promoted by companies like OpenAI is one of those things that are making the world a worse place.
    • to such people, using GenAI for convenience does not excuse anyone from contributing to companies/systems that are making the world a worse place.

    So I guess if someone honestly believes that GenAI is not bad, then they are being morally consistent when they use it. However, if they're making an infographic, the point of it may be lost on those who believe that GenAI is bad and thus have a morally consistent aversion to it.

    Now, IS GenAI really that bad? That argument seems to be raging elsewhere in this thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Nah, handing someone your phone without sensible precautions to lock down sensitive data is irresponsible and begging for trouble. There's never a good reason to do that just to show a photo. Someone might think you're sharing an album, and even then, there are far better ways to share without compromising security.

    Might as well share your bank account with them or spread your ass cheeks wide open. Such irresponsibility lacks etiquette.

    Lack of text alternative breaks etiquette and web accessibility.Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:

    • usability
      • we can't quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
      • text search is unavailable
      • the system can't
        • reflow text to varied screen sizes
        • vary presentation (size, contrast)
        • vary modality (audio, braille)
    • accessibility
      • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
      • some users can't read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
      • users can't adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
      • systems can't read the text to them or send it to braille devices
    • searchability: the "text" isn't indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
    • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
      • image breaks
      • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

    Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    I partly agree, like if you have sensitive images like nudes or other stuff you don’t want others to see, then put it in a protected folder requiring your password just to be safe. There’s also the fact most phone image viewers also have previews of other images at the bottom, so the other person could accidentally glance and see a faint icon of a dick or whatever and still find it a bit weird.

    Then again though, if you hand someone your phone to see a single image, and that person feels it’s their right to see your entire photo library, to say it directly, they’re an obnoxious dickhead.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›