A high-ranking federal prosecutor in California is receiving backlash Saturday from gun rights groups like the NRA after his comments on the deadly shooting in Minneapolis Saturday.

In a post on X, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli cautioned against approaching law enforcement with a firearm, arguing that there is a "high likelihood" officers would be legally justified in shooting.

The National Rifle Association condemned Essayli's comments on the shooting.

"This sentiment from the First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California is dangerous and wrong," wrote the NRA in a response to his comment on X. "Responsible public voices should be awaiting a full investigation, not making generalizations and demonizing law-abiding citizens.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 9 months ago (1 child)

Good god the NRA is such a BS organization.

On one end they are yelling at one politician for saying, bringing a gun to a protest has a chance of giving them an excuse to shoot you. Which is objectively what just fricking happened, and good grief Bill Essayli's backtrack of it is... almost worse.

"I never said it's legally justified to shoot law-abiding concealed carriers. My comment addressed agitators approaching law enforcement with a gun and refusing to disarm"

Good fucking grief... The man wasn't an agitator... he didn't "refuse to disarm". He got the shit kicked out of him for trying to help a woman up, before they spotted the gun, disarmed him themselves and then executed him.

Key takeaways from the actual incident.

If you concealed carry. You are morally and legally in the right to do so, but the untrained keystone cops of ice, might kill you, and it remains to be seen if there is any hope that they will be held accountable.

NRA almost wants to take the right side here... but of course "wait for the full investigation" is there way of saying "ok look this is exactly the situation we've been saying we're going to defend... but it's crimes by the republicans so... lets find a democrat we can try to blame and say nothing about the responsible concealed carry person that was just executed.

They damn well know there will never be any kind of investigation... they know damn well that the evidence we have right now put together by concerned citizens, is the only evidence that we will ever get. Besides the lies that the current administration is going to say on TV.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago

    NRA almost wants to take the right side here... but of course "wait for the full investigation" is there way of saying "ok look this is exactly the situation we've been saying we're going to defend... but it's crimes by the republicans so... lets find a democrat we can try to blame and say nothing about the responsible concealed carry person that was just executed.

    God fucking damn it, this is exactly what is happening. This whole situation is so fucked up that it's basically forcing even a corrupt organization like the NRA into the right position, yet they are still not able to do the right thing.

    It just fully proves that Republicans NEVER argue in good faith. They have no morals, no convictions other than power at all costs.

    Fucking evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago

    Don’t sleep on this other gem of a comment they made:

    "For months, radical progressive politicians like Tim Walz have incited violence against law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their jobs. Unsurprisingly, these calls to dangerously interject oneself into legitimate law-enforcement activities have ended in violence, tragically resulting in injuries and fatalities," wrote the NRA

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    C'mon NRA. The reason for your whole existence is so citizens can form a militia when their own government starts to rot and becomes violent towards them. Hmm...maybe it was the money all along. Mo' wars, mo' violence, mo' strife, mo' money.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    Slams?

    Their response was an uncertain and apprehensive "let's wait for the investigation".

    NRA, this is your moment to put actions behind words and you quietly sit in a corner rocking back and forth, because this time it's daddy orange behind the trigger man? What a joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    NRA never was about rights l, it was all about Republicans and money for gun manufacturers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    I recently bought a gun and they asked if I wanted to add an amount to donate to the NRA.

    I said fuck no.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    The NRA needs to STFU at this point. They enabled this. Their followers are either collaborators (being ICE), or cowards who cosplayed defending against Authoritarianism; the time they could have mobilized to assert their Holy 2nd Amendment is already long past.

    Of course it's neither and both -- they just wanted the money.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    You also need to take into consideration that a significant amount of the NRAs funding was found to be from Russian sources. If not entirely compromised they have to be considered at least somewhat functioning as a Russian asset. Between that and their blatant bias towards gun manufacturers interests we really shouldn't be surprised when they fail to operate in the best interests of the American public.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Seriously California should consider replacing him. Given the political climate and event that caused this statment its in bad taste assuming he isn't a fascist.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    He's a federal prosecutor, so he's a career federal employee. The state of California did not confirm him. It's the area in which he operates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments