Gift link, with URL shortener so that Lemmy doesn't remove the gift token

Additional reporting from Bring Me The News. They have removed the following text from their coverage:

Federal agents briefly detained our reporter at the scene, who says he was tackled to the ground and had a gun put in his face.

New York Times

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 141 points 9 months ago (4 children)

they executed this man. they beat him to the ground, pistol whipped him, and then shot him WHILE HE WAS PRONE AND LAYING DOWN.

Americans, for fucks sake, on the other site I'd be perma banned for suggesting what you know I'm going to suggest but you guys REALLY need to utilize that 2nd amendment you hold so dear. They are literally NOW executing you and to those that STILL believe "it won't happen to me or my family" you're wrong, it will and it currently is.

The only GOOD Nazi is a DEAD one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    The only GOOD Nazi is a DEAD one.

    The Greatest Generation understood this at great cost, and after that bloody sacrifice our leaders quietly pardoned and installed the wretched and vile filth into influential positions anyway, sugarcoating their twisted ideology with a shiny star-spangled finish and telling us freedom had won the day.

    Would our great grandfathers still have charged those beaches if they could see how "great" their country has become today?

    (Edit) I think they would...

    We disappoint their memory at our peril.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    No 2a response. This requires organization by competent people with military training in coordination with state government. Where this is going is obvious now. Citizens need to keep on with nonviolent protests and hope to hell there are retired generals out there willing step up and plan and implement what's needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    Walz should be using the activated MN National Guard to arrest the ICE fucker who executed a MN resident and to cordon DHS personnel to their federal buildings, denying them the ability to leave the wire to go out on CP’s. Instead he’s staging them against the MN residents protesting. Fucking bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Ironically this is literally the "well armed militia" part of the second amendment that conservatives seem to ignore. Some were concerned that the federal government could simply use military force to undermine state sovereignty, so they enshrined the ability for the states to regulate militias independent of the federal government.

    The fascists have spent decades eroding this right by pushing the idea that the amendment is about self defense of the individual, which is a much less of a threat to their fascist aspirations. Now we see the ultimate conclusion of this ideological trojan horse - the "second amendment crowd" is enthusiastically embracing fascism, while the states are powerless to push back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 113 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    Here is the video. There is no justification for this shooting.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m1xOMR7R4q8

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    That makes me sick to my stomach.

    The sanctity of a human life has lost all meaning if it can be violated so casually without consequences...

    This pot's about to boil over. It won't be long now...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I can't find the interview now or remember who it was with because of my brainrot but roughly than six months ago this woman was saying in no uncertain terms things will get progressively darker and more violent. And I've thought of that when every one of these moments has arisen. She was speaking more to the need of a parent whose health premiums quadrupled and SNAP benefits were cut having to care for and feed a sick child and what that might do to their anger and willingness to go do something against the elements foisting this upon them, but of course we never can predict what the precise hinge point moments are going to be during turbulent times. We just knew they were coming. And now they are. And will continue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    "And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days. But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day. For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Watched video a dozen times looking for a weapon near or on the person shot. Just couldn’t imagine how to justify this otherwise.

    I see a water bottle hit the ground early in the video but that’s it. Clear hands and wasteband from what I can see so far.

    I’d love to be wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    It's like that one video with the cop dropping to the ground doing barrel rolls and shouting shots fired, when an acorn fell and hit the roof of a car.

    Bunch of untrained morons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    From what I understand, the water bottle was a mace canister. Some reports were saying the guy was reaching for it to use as a weapon but I don't see that. It is then kicked away. Also, pay attention to the agent in the gray jacket. He walks up a bit late, and disarms the victim by pulling the (holstered) pistol from his waistband. He then runs away holding the weapon as the victim is shot. Like a dozen times.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    It would’t matter if he was strapped with a .45 brother, that’s a right we have right after speech. They’re in the wrong here, this was MURDER. It was not even an execution. Execution implies you know it’s coming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 228 points 9 months ago (45 children)

    Watch the video.

    It's tough, because it's literally a video of a murder.

    But we all have to watch it.

    3-4 Icicles at holding a man down and beating him, one of them lets off a single shot that instantly makes their victim go limp. Then 2-3 other icicles all draw and fire multiple shots into the body while the rest scatter.

    Shit isn't getting better and complying doesn't work.

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I watched it multiple times and they just executed that guy. They just unloaded the entire clip into the body. Fucking hell that's just gruesome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I'm trying really hard to see how this could be anything else than a straight up execution. It's hard to see any way that dude could be threatening the life of anyone here. He's shot on his knees with his hands down looking away from the shooter (granted the footage we have here it's kind of hard to tell just cause there's so many people). There's footage of him talking to the agents before just holding his phone to record and then they start shoving him. There's also 8 bajillion agents beating the shit out of him right before. The woman's footage from the other side of this will show a ton if she was recording.

    Anyways, I look forward to hearing how this heroic agent saved the lives of all his fellow warriors during this altercation. Hope the agent recovers from the assault safely and quickly in the hospital...

    Edit: few things, someone pointed out the agent in the grey coat disarms the victim and runs away with his weapon before he's killed which I did not see at first.

    Also, second lady's footage is now out and it doesn't show anything different than a bunch of thugs beating the shit out of this guy and then killing him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago*

    I'm about to watch the video, but just want to state my thoughts after reading the article:

    Video shows several agents wrestling the man to the ground and shooting him multiple times

    This is the only information the article states. Their passive language suggests to me the sequence of actions is unclear, but probably that while wrestling him, he was shot before being fully restrained

    Now to watch the video and find out if the wording is propaganda


    2 notes:

    1. That shooting is so much worse than the wording would suggest

    2. I didn't realize the article was in a feed format. Explains why it was only 1 sentence

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 102 points 9 months ago (19 children)

    This is why I'm saying we need to get even more violent in retaliation.

    People can downvote me all you want, but you know I'm right. It's literally the only thing these actual monkey-brains understand: violence.

    If there's 4 of them beating and killing one person, there needs to be at least 10 of us with knives and aluminum bats hitting right back. We need to mix up our own chemical warfare agents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Show up alone, you get arrested. Show up with 100 people, you get shot. We need to show up with 100,000+ people.

    Organize! Join an organization! DSA, PSL, something anything!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    What you do is break that 100k up into 100 separate 1000 person marches. That then also spreads out the Feds and makes it basically impossible for them to round everyone up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Pretty sure they did have 100k+ people yesterday at least. Maybe not yet this early, but 100k people does not mean much when the organized violent thugs just wait until they can find people away from the large crowds and murder them on the street.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I see one person in this video. Imagine if there was 100,000.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    There was. And then they left ICE intact, which then found a spot the next morning with maybe a dozen or people and did a murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    there needs to be at least 10 of us with knives and aluminum bats hitting right back.

    No, because that will make them open fire...

    What will work is protesters in plated vests with rifles.

    Every state is different. For Minnesota it's illegal to open carry a rifle, and there's no permit to open carry a rifle. But if you get a permit to carry a handgun, you're now allowed to carry a rifle.

    The threat of effective violence is more effective than the actual act of ineffective violence, even when the threat is just passively implied by the presence of rifles and plates.

    It costs less than a grand to get kitted out just like an ICE agent, hell, most of them don't even seem to carry rifles, but all the more reason for protesters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    Protesters should assign disciplined guardians: Kitted out, and watching from rooftops and windows.

    These terrorist cowards might come to understand the words "constitutional oversight" when they break RoE and are gravely punished from above in return.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Other people who read the news are not idiots and do not need this thinking outlined for them, it does nobody besides feds trying to make bullshit arrests for terroristic threats any good to share these thoughts on public forums

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    we need to get even more violent in retaliation.

    That's how you lose.

    That's what they want.

    Right now two white people getting killed by ICE in broad daylight with dozens of cameras on them is slowly but surely destroying the GOP. There's nothing that shifts public opinion more than a clear narrative of "good guys" and "bad guys". When one side is armed and the other side is unarmed, and the armed people are killing unarmed people, there are clear good guys and bad guys. The white house is doing everything they can to spin the Minneapolis victims as "terrorists", but when they're unarmed it's a matter of seconds to disprove what they're saying.

    As soon as the anti-ICE protesters start getting armed and start shooting back, the story gets complicated again. It becomes much easier to claim the protesters are violent if they're shooting back. It's dead easy to claim an ICE goon feared for his life if someone shot at him.

    "They're shooting at ICE" gives Trump the excuse he needs to send in the military and start having guys in APCs start shooting heavy weapons into a crowd. It's also much more likely the soldiers are going to obey if they're getting shot at. If they're sent in against unarmed protesters and ordered to mow them down, it's very likely they'll refuse that order. And, refusing that order would be a big step in the end of the Trump regime.

    Not shooting back is the main thing that the Minneapolis protesters have done right so far. It's also the most difficult thing to do.

    But hey, it's America. America thinks guns solve problems. So, go solve that problem Americanely, while the rest of the world just watches the US tear itself apart and shakes their heads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    People are currently not shooting back, and people are currently being murdered in the streets. Clearly it’s a plan that is working well so far /s.

    You talk about a “good guy/bad guy” narrative, and then admit that the current government is painting the victims as terrorists. So why do you think your narrative is any stronger than the one that the president and many popular news media outlets are complicit in? Especially when you personally are telling people not to watch the objective footage.

    The world is watching the US right now, and we are seeing innocent people die in the street, while people comment about how bad this will be for Trump in the next election and people need to get out there and vote while the Slavecatchers pull families from their homes. I’m feel like I’m losing my mind!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    People are currently not shooting back, and people are currently being murdered in the streets

    A small enough number that they can all be listed by name. You're correct, it's a plan that is working incredibly well. A handful of people have died, and those handful of deaths have resulted in protests by millions of people. The reason that those millions of people are willing to protest is that the people being killed are clearly blameless.

    If someone died in a shootout with ICE, it's much less likely that millions of people would turn out to protest their death. Thousands maybe, but not millions. For millions to show up you need a clear example of "good guys" and "bad guys".

    then admit that the current government is painting the victims as terrorists

    Yes, the government is trying to create its own "good guys" and "bad guys" narrative because, as I said, it works. But, they are utterly failing in the attempt to paint these people as bad guys because they're being killed while unarmed and not fighting back.

    So why do you think your narrative is any stronger than the one that the president and many popular news media outlets are complicit in

    Because "my" narrative is clearly supported by all the video evidence that is being collected by hundreds of people with their phones out. If people weren't there with their phones out documenting things, then the Trump admin's narrative would probably win. But, instead of guns, people are using cameras, and it's working.

    Especially when you personally are telling people not to watch the objective footage

    I'm telling people that they don't need to traumatize themselves by watching footage that literally millions, if not possibly billions of other people have already watched. Their additional eyeballs on that footage isn't going to do anything.

    The world is watching the US right now

    Yes, and the world has sympathy with the protesters because the protesters are unarmed while the ICE goons are armed. If the protesters started shooting, the world would quickly lose sympathy with the protesters. Instead they'd just sigh and think "great, the Americans are trying to solve everything with guns again".

    I’m feel like I’m losing my mind!

    It might be good for you to unplug and stop subjecting yourself to the constant news cycle then. Don't watch all these videos, just take care of your own mental health.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    A small enough number that they can all be listed by name. You're correct, it's a plan that is working incredibly well.

    Some of you may die, but that is a risk that I am willing to take.

    Because "my" narrative is clearly supported by all the video evidence that is being collected by hundreds of people with their phones out.

    We have evidence of wrongdoing and crimes by the governments that spans years. If evidence was enough to topple this regime, we wouldn’t be here.

    It might be good for you to unplug and stop subjecting yourself to the constant news cycle then. Don't watch all these videos, just take care of your own mental health.

    Kindly go fuck yourself you patronising git. I am mature enough to look after my mental health, and I choose not to turn away from the events that are unfolding. I do not need to be hooked into the 24h news cycle to see that things are dire, and ignoring them or telling others to ignore them is the kind of shit that lets dictators steal more power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Some of you may die, but that is a risk that I am willing to take.

    "Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice that I am willing to make."

    Get your quotes right.

    You could also have gone with Thomas Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

    But, if you wanted to quote about the futility of using violence you could have gone with Gandhi:

    "I object to violence because, when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary, the evil it does is permanent."

    Or Joan Baez:

    "Nonviolence is a flop. The only bigger flop is violence."

    Or MLK Jr:

    "Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon . . . which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals"

    Maybe you're so gun-brained you think that MLK and Gandhi were wrong, and that they would have achieved better results if they'd shot back. Maybe you've never heard of the velvet revolution, or the 1919 Egyptian revolution, or what led to the Berlin Wall coming down.

    If evidence was enough to topple this regime, we wouldn’t be here.

    Of course evidence isn't enough. The question is what comes after evidence. Is it violence or not? Non-violence clearly motivates people. Only 2 people have been killed and it has resulted in millions of people protesting. Would just as many people be coming out to support Minnesota if the score were 2 ICE agents dead and 2 protesters dead? I don't think so.

    Do you honestly think you can take on the US government including the entire US military with a violent revolution? And, if you did manage to win that violent revolution, would it be worth the cost? If you're going for the violent win, that's what you have to aim for. If you go for the non-violent option, the path is instead that more and more people defect to your side and refuse to use violence against non-violent protesters. That has a much better chance of winning IMO.

    Kindly go fuck yourself you patronising git.

    You say you feel like you're losing your mind, and you attack someone who suggests maybe you should take a step back. You clearly have fragile mental health. Just unplug for a few days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    But we all have to watch it.

    Repeating for emphasis. Official stories are already being posted that are blatantly not what happened. There will be some portion of the population that believes the lies they're told. It's powerful for your own sanity to be able to know with certainty that you're being fed bullshit because you remember seeing it with your own eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I disagree about everyone having to watch it.

    I am capable of believing you, others that have seen the footage, and the reports coming out about what's happened here. Seeing the act in full detail isn't going to strengthen my resolve against ICE, nor make me more empathetic to this man or his family.

    This is all barbaric, and while I similarly don't think it's getting any better, I don't have to watch a recording of the last moment of this man's life to know he was murdered, just as you don't have to go see his corpse in the morgue to know the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    No.

    You need the visceral emotional reaction.

    That's different than logically understanding the abstract concept a murder happened. That's not new, but what happens in this video is new. It crosses the line in an inexplicable fashion and either enough people see it happen once in this video all at the same time, or we all wait to see it individually in person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    With respect, don't tell me what I need based on what you need.

    I don't need to see a thing to have an emotional reaction to it. I am not a child lacking object permanence.

    Being able to watch a dozen different angles of a person's death in high definition isn't necessary for everybody. Most murders have no footage, and empathy can still be experienced for them. Surely you also run the emotional gambit when you read of a school shooting, whether or not there is footage of the carnage, don't you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    With respect, don’t tell me what I need based on what you need

    You don't understand any of this, but if you were polite and asked questions I would have explained it and you'd have walked away from this with more knowledge than you had now.

    Think about who really lost in this exchange

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Who really lost? You perceive this back and forth as something that can be won or lost? Both you and I are arguing semantics from behind screens, not out risking our life and limb. There are no winners here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    You do though, because one the authorities start spinning their lies, there will be an element of doubt in everyone who has not seen this video.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    An element of doubt? I can think critically. Can you not? The default thought hasn't been 'trust the authories' for quite a while now. Rather the opposite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    If you hear two conflicting stories, without witnessing for yourself, there will always be an element of doubt. I'm not saying trust the authoritys, and I don't know where you got that from. I'm saying you shouldn't blindly believe what anyone says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I got it from the comment you wrote.

    because one the authorities start spinning their lies

    I haven't suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn't necessary for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Let's break this down more.

    If we choose to believe he had a gun so what? You are legally allowed to carry a gun in this country. The presence of a gun is not a legal excuse to murder a person.

    Even if he had a gun he was being actively held down by several members of ICE. I don't see how he could have drawn a weapon in that position. Regardless once they started beating him while he was on the ground he had every right to use deadly force to defend himself.

    So even if you believe what DHS has to say the video shows there is no scenario where the mere presence of a gun justifies their actions

    I rewatched the video and you can see his entire back, no weapon below the waist. If he had a gun in his hands they would have shot him on site. They're just lying to us

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Watch the video again.

    Tan beanie greenish coat guy pulls out a pistol and starts pistol whipping the guy.

    Grey coat sees this, and nopes the fuck out.

    Tan beanie stops pistol whipping him, readjusts his grip...

    Then his hand is block in the video and a single shot rings out, causing everyone else to flea before shooting the body.

    It really really looks like this guy just decides to escalate from pistol whipping a restrained and subdued man to shooting him in the head while multiple other people who didn't know what was going on held the victim down.

    This is just inexplicably fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 82 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    They fucking mag dumped after the victim is clearly dead. These fucking fascists are untrained racist cowards. Every fucking ICE agent deserves to be imprisoned.

    If you’re not screaming to destroy ICE I don’t want to hear your fucking opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 73 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Fucking hell.

    This was an execution.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 70 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Several witnesses have already been transported to the Whipple building. ICE attempted to order local police from the scene, but O’Hara refused, sources said.

    O’Hara instructed his officers to preserve the scene. The BCA was enroute to the scene.

    All available MPD officers have been called into work, except dogwatch (overnight shift), and days off cancelled.

    Lines are being drawn.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 61 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    From what I understand, the man was recording. Approached by ICE, pushed by ICE, then assaulted by 6+ ICE agents, then murdered.

    Next headline: Paid insane far left violent radical terrorist, viciously attacks lone ICE agent trying to deescalate situation. ICE agent barely survive with near fatal wounds.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    There's footage of pretty much all of that. He's talking to ice agents holding his phone. He's then pushed around. Another protestor is also pushed. He moves toward that protestor who is on the ground. They swarm him and the rest is history.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Ohh, I think I see what happened. The up close angle makes it clear that "dangerous" man was trying to assist two unarmed women who were being assaulted by federal fascists after they made the fatal mistake of... maybe saying something mean (? I guess) or disrespectfully blowing whistles on a public street and trying to walk away.

    I guess Americans should really know better than to try and deescalate when fascists are in the middle of having such a fucking ball assaulting their neighbors.

    Note to all the "white knights" out there (not the ones who traded their hoods and crosses for a government issued mask and gun, just the ones that respect women): be careful not to cross the sexually frustrated terrorists when they're out there working through their issues with women. They've been training their whole lives for the day somebody would actually pay them to put a woman in her place when she gets a little too sassy. It's not fair for you to spoil it for them. /s

    What the fuck were those broads thinking anyway? They must have known there would be fatal consequences for their actions. I mean really, imagine the audacity of just walking right up to and disrespectfully whistling at a white supremacist on a public street in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So basically the opening scene of V for Vandetta, but the guy wasn't V

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    In case gift links don't work for anyone for whatever reason,

    Archive for ST - https://archive.ph/NLoQx

    Archive for BMN - https://web.archive.org/web/20260124160643/https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/breaking-federal-agent-shoots-man-in-south-minneapolis

    I wasn't able to find any snapshots of that removed text, but it seems super plausible because they apparently had a reporter who happened to be on the scene before and when things went down

    A Bring Me The News reporter who was near the scene said an agent opened fire at a man outside Glam Doll Donuts at Nicollet Avenue and 26th Street at around 9 a.m.

    ...

    Immediately after our reporter approached the scene, an agent was heard yelling for help and scissors to open the victim's shirt. Agents told our reporter that they had immediately called 911 for assistance.

    I'm guessing they told him that at the barrel of a gun, interesting that the optics of them refusing that doctor who wanted to do lifesaving care on Renee apparently got to them

    But if this detail is confirmed I can't imagine how pissed off the cities are about to be

    New video uploaded to Reddit shows several federal agents struggling with a man outside Glam Doll, during which a shot is fired, followed by multiple more shots fired at the man as he lay on the ground. [Ital added]

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago

    The first shot instantly made the victim go limp. You can't see most of his body, but arms and legs go limp immediately.

    All the agents jump away, and multiple immediately fire multiple times each into the body anyways

    They were fine with medical, because they were confident he was already dead at that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 25 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    The video seems real enough, and is exactly as described. They're trying to incite a violent response so they can justify calling in the paratroopers who are on standby

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    If they think that a lack of justification is going to stop the fascists, they've got another think coming. Even if the response is completely non-violent, the fascists will just get tired of waiting and invent their own excuses, like they always do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It won't stop them, but will make it easier to rally the broader public against the Nazis. Having more people siding against them is important

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Yeah, I feel like they're going to go martial law in October no matter what, but in the meantime violence from protesters is just going to a) fracture the anti fascist coalition b) provoke retaliation from ICE that will hit bystanders

    Things may get worse no matter what but violence is likely to make them worse

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Paratroopers?

    As fucked up as it is, I hope someone wants to see how resistant those parachutes are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago

    https://files.catbox.moe/sp296e.mp4

    Video from the lady in pink (opposite to the first one). The man to the right in green literally pulls out his gun for no reason and shoots the guy in the back of the head. Absolutely horrid.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I have no words. I am literally speechless at what is currently happening in the US. I have to force myself to have words and they are all a mixture of vengeance and justice. Like.. holly fuck.

    There is still a long way to go. A long way to go. But after all this is said and done, if there is an after, I hope you never forget these pieces of shit. I hope you force whomever comes next to hand you these people. They do not deserve jail, they deserve justice as given from the community. They are evil behind comprehension. Seems like you cannot give an inch to the right, as they will let their evilness take over and go after everyone, mercilessly.

    I hope there is good work being done on identifying and preserving whoever these evil pieces of shit, motherfuckers, morons, idiots, pedophiles, are. And when this is all done, you fucking drive all of them out of society. You bully them as long and as hard as possible.

    Pieces of shit motherfuckers.

    To my American brothers, I am truly sorry for what is happening. I don't know the right thing to say. I want to motivate you to do what needs to be done, but at the same time, I am fully aware that it is hard.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    8 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    2 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    2 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    2 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post
    1 comment in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post