I see a lot of piefed posts on Lemmy - are we not federated across so that we're getting the milk without needing to buy the cow?
post
Why vs when we can just interop?
We are not like traditional websites. When one community does well, we can all do well.
Piefed users comment and post to lemmy and via versa.
I thought PieFed and Lemmy were one and the same.
I am not savvy on how this place is structured.
Lemmy and piefed are like different brands of phones. They do the same basic things for communicating with any other phone, but have different features for the user to interact with and different limitations.
This is beautiful. The fediverse has achieved it purpose.
To be so seamless that you can't tell a difference.
I have no idea. I'm a vanilla, semi-norm who came from Reddit, mainly because they banned me after 15 years of active and mostly chill engagement.
I'm basically just a slightly opinionated guy who's interested in what other people have to say on a variety of subjects.
I'm only dimly aware of PieFeed. I like lemmy as it feels like early Reddit and I access it through the boost app on Android, which was the peak Reddit experience before they locked down the APIs.
I've no interest in spreading myself over multiple platforms - I just want access to other humans via the path of least resistance.
With this in mind, is PieFace better? And if so, in what way?
Piefed has a bunch of tools Lemmy doesn't have: Flairs, Hashtags, Custom Feeds (Private and Public), Scheduled Posts, Combined comment sections for crossposts, Emote Reactions, Events, Polls
Most of these will also be available in Lemmy 1.0 soon!
Hello,
Hope you are doing well. Any time-frame (even rough) in mind for Lemmy 1.0 release?
We are currently finishing to implement the last feature community post tags. Once that is done there is still some cleanup and bug fixing to do. Soon after that we will publish the first beta version of 1.0 (likely in February), and ask app devs to start implementing the new API v4. How long the beta phase lasts is hard to say, it depends how many problems pop up.
Interesting..Can you use boost or a similar app with it? Also, how popular is it compared to here in terms of user?
I switched to piefed to help it grow, although for me the lemmy experience is still superior, due to the difference in clients available for Android.
On Android, the Voyager Lemmy client is better than the Blorp Piefed client.
Since the blorp Dev reads these comments (thanks for making us free software!), here's my list of features to bring blorp up to parity, from most to least important:
- Choose what type of link to share by default: community link, poster's link, my instance link, or blorp link, or other.... Currently when I want to share something, I have to open it on Voyager to get a link.
- Ability to select text in comments. Voyager has this in the context menu.
- Ability to hide read posts. Blorp has this setting but it doesn't work. When I open piefed I see old posts, but on Voyager I see fresh stuff.
- Ability to download .webp images. Downloads fail, but I can "share" the file to a file manager and save it that way.
- Put the profile button on the bottom stripe so it is easier to reach.
I thought Voyager supports piefed now?
it does. i am using voyager on piefed right now.
I guess I'm bad at logging in. Thanks.

Hm, perhaps your instance needs to update to a newer version? I notice that it's on 1.4.6, while Piefed.social is currently running version 1.5.3
EDIT: Ah, nevermind, 1.4.6 is only a couple weeks old! I was thinking of the gap in those releases in relation to Lemmy's, where that would be a massive difference.
Is voyager updated to the latest release?
I have Voyager 2.43.2 which is the latest on fdroid and also the latest stable release on GitHub. Maybe it is on the blahaj side?
I had to sign up for the experimental bug test version of Voyager to gain access to piefed compatibility, though that was several months ago now; not sure if it's been added to the main version yet or not. I haven't had any issues using the experimental version.
It does. The only thing I miss compared to the Lemmy experience is that "auto fill title" does not work yet when link posting. However, most of the PieFed features aren't integrated into Voyager yet, so it will be similar to the Lemmy experience but you will miss out a lot of PieFed stuff.
Ah, good to know. I'm already pretty happy with the lemmy voyager experience for just passive scrolling, and mostly do anything important (mod actions, longer comments, etc) on desktop anyway, so for me at least, that switch would be pretty seamless. Though hopefully Voyager supports more piefed features in the future!
When I moved from Lemmy to Piefed, I just dumped apps all together. I've been using the web version since and it works absolutely fine for my use. Granted, I mostly comment, having only created a few posts ever. So perhaps using built in "share" feature of phone OSs is useful, but besides that, the web version works great.
Do you mind opening a GitHub issue? You can just make a single issue with that checklist. Itβs just easier for me to track what needs to be done in GitHub instead of random Lemmy/PieFed comments. PieFed hide read should be an easy fix.
Would you be willing to try Summit? That also supports piefed instances for some time now.
I didn't know voyager now supports piefed. Have to give it a try some time.
Trying it out, first step change post type to cardΒ full!
Edit: how do you actually post something? EDIT: it is the ... Menu
Piefed has some neat features unique to it, such as:
- a very nice gallery view for image heavy communities.
- the ability to combine comments from multiple communities under one post, if the same link was posted to all of them. You can see an example of that here (notice how the comments have dividers for each community).
- the ability to create and subscribe to a pre-made list of communities, sorta like a multi-reddit.
On the sysadmin side of things, it'd bring some nice advantages regarding network resource usage and page loading speed, and benefits from using tried and tested industry standard frameworks (I.e, Flask), instead of bespoke solutions.
Page loading speed is interesting. Your link only tested on mobile. A few days ago I did a non-scientific test, on desktop, (just me browing on piefed) and I thought lemmy was faster. But I may be wrong, or it was just instance specific.
In most cases, when bandwidth/latency is not a bottleneck, the thing that limits page load times is the database (in both lemmy and piefed's case). So, if an instance has a beefy server they are running their db on, then it is going to snappier most of the time.
The difference in speed could be due to differing hardware specs of the servers, locations of the servers in relation to you, and the amount of user activity on each server.
I'm not sure if piefed.ca is hosted in the same location as lemmy.ca, or if their server specs are similar, but it probably has a better chance of being able to compare relative speed.
On my end at least, they both seem about equally as fast, but perhaps it would be more noticeable on a slower internet speed.
Piefed Game Changer number 1: Custom feeds, ex:
that way I can look at non-tech non-politics stuff (either few memes or all memes) when I want.
Piefed Game Changer number 2: Scheduled posts. That way when I got free time I can make a bunch of posts and schedule them over the next couple days or weeks.
I still keep a Lemmy account bc a couple things are still easier there. Plus to see what the posts look like to other people.
I don't really understand the difference between the two. Don't they essentially do the same thing, connect to the same communities, etc? (Apart from some minor details)
Piefed is its own software. If you just go to piefed.social you'll see it is massively different and has different tools and functions.
But yes, they both federate with the same communities.
I just clicked over there and it has the "new" Reddit style rather than the "old" Reddit style. That's a pretty big ding off the bat if the style can't be changed.
It seems to have a very different, potentially better feed than lemmy, interesting, might switch
I picked Mbin
I was using Lemmy, I now use Piefed and I quite satisfied (it's not perfect, sure, neither am I ;).
Can't recall why I switched but I know there was some technical reason.
To me, they're just two ways (among a few more) of accessing the same fediverse. I use the Web UI, on a desktop computer as I don't do social media on my phone.
I used Lemmy for a few years, but switched to PieFed recently. They offer very similar functionality. PieFed suits me slightly better. I would be happy with either. And I'm still using Voyager.
I like piefed.
I dont have a client, just the web ui in my phones browser is fine.
It honestly just feels exactly like lemmy to me, but I prefer not to support lemmy for ideological reasons.
Piefed and Lemmy are act-pub/fediverse software systems, same with Mastodon and many others. Since Lemmy and Piefed are so similar in their structure though as link aggregators that people vote and comment on you could think of them as the same network with different clients.
I switched from Lemmy to Piefed somewhere around piefed's 1.15 version as I recall. On a technical front Piefed is a solid margin ahead in admin and usability features, at least as of when I switched. I haven't noticed a major performance difference, but mine is a single user instance so that might be better shown at a larger scale. Lemmy was a bit easier to deploy initially since there wasn't a need to have anything compile locally but rather just pull an image and go.
Ethically, I'm less concerned using Piefed than Lemmy. The devs of Lemmy are notoriously vocal in their support of Russia/China/Korea, and basically anything that could be considered in opposition of western liberal/progressive policies. This is troublesome since there is the potential for updates being made that help create even more aggressively divisive bubbles than we already have in many parts of the fedi. Those could be applied to any software of course, but the Lemmy devs make their stances quite visible in that regard.
There are a lot of tankies on lemmy, but I've only seen it on a couple of instances. It's not worth the time to make common cause with them I've learned, they just want to make the cheap point of west bad, not fix anything, their whole point is it can't be fixed. As if the alternative of getting a one party state would lead to a better outcome. They can't even have their own opinions or make up their own minds it appears, they need permission from their leaders to even agree on something not already endorsed.
Piefed has some critical features like, non-nsfw blur, flairs, ability to disable notifications from relies on posts and more information is exposed to admins.
Iβve been testing both for some time and the differences are pretty minor. What I really like about PieFed comes down to two things: how it groups cross-posts and their comments (on the web version), and the moderation tools. The downside is that there are a lot fewer mobile apps that support it.
Cross-posting is an amazing feature thatβs still massively underused.
IMO they're both good and deserve our weight, I do think they can work off each other.
I use Lemmy because their mobile app support is much better and Jerboa (the Lemmy maintainers' app) has everything I need and not a single bit more. I think it would be great for Piefed to get more app support.
There are a lot of features that I think Lemmy can benefit from emulating from Piefed, like the option to show comments from crossposted threads, filters, and more granular moderation capability. I heard Piefed is a lot lighter on resources, so if I were to self-host I might use that one. Also I have no idea how many of Lemmy's shortcomings are due to be addressed in their planned 1.0 release.
Lemmy development is slow whereas Piefed is a bit faster, I think each is great in their own right. Not everyone agrees with me here, but I think the Lemmy developers do a good job keeping their personal beliefs to their own instance, rather than let it infiltrate the code base. Same with Piefed. I think the development of both should be encouraged rather than trying to find rifts and making it a team sport.
and this one:
User vote totals: You can see the total number of upvotes and downvotes given to each user.
people were happy that lemmy does not do this...
- A lot of people on the Threadiverse refuse to donate to Lemmy due to their beliefs, which hinders future growth of the code.
- A lot of people on Reddit or X or Facebook hear about the devs and immediately nope out of the entire Threadiverse, possibly going instead to Bluesky.
So PieFed is great for the health and growth not just of itself but for the entire Threadiverse, imho. And then seeing how well and which features are most popular in PieFed, Lemmy can copy to improve experience on that side. Also as people leave Lemmy - e.g. lemm.ee shutting down was a major event but even more relevant is the overall reduction in number of active users, from ~55k in the peak after Rexodus to only ~35k today - then hopefully PieFed can at least entice some of those who are definitely leaving Lemmy to remain at least in the wider Threadiverse.
That said, as Lemmy moves forward so slowly, increasingly it is going to miss out on an ever-growing share of what that wider Threadiverse offers. e.g. polls and hashtags, neither of which I see mentioned in the planned 1.0 release. Every single post, if Lemmy can render it at all (it can't for polls) will lack information that only shows on PieFed. And with funding, active user counts, and number of new instances all decreasing... this going to affect Lemmy further. Most of that would have happened anyway regardless of whether PieFed existed though, so again I am glad for the latter since otherwise people would just leave the Threadiverse entirely. e.g. here is one such very interesting irl story: https://jeena.net/lemmy-switch-to-piefed.
that page limit is very bad. essentially makes lemmy posts ephemeral. did we forget that we hated it when reddit did that?
I'm on Lemmy (db0) because, at the time, I thought PieFed was just another instance, and I chose the instance I liked best without much thought behind what software it ran.
db0 has talked about spinning up a PieFed instance, but I would have to join it and I'd have two accounts. I'm not sure I want to manage two accounts. AFAIK they are not talking about converting to PieFed (if such a thing is possible).
On the tech side, the two mostly federate with one another. I (maybe mistakenly) called out a PieFed user for not posting a link. They thought they did. And they did β it was visible on PieFed, but it was not visible to Lemmy. So they apologised and posted the link in the body of their text, and I apologised for not understanding how things worked. So that is an issue Lemmy (the people who make the software) would have to address, and then db0 would have to update the code on their server (I believe).
So I think as long as they continue to federate to one another, it's fine to just use what you want. If one starts to pull ahead and the other is not catching up, it might be wise to switch, especially if there is a way to pull all your subscriptions, blocks, and managed communities from one to the other.
I have no idea about the ethics of using either.
What about Mbin? How is it different?Β
Mbin went the route of making ensuring microblogs like mastodon were fully compatible, so it can offer both a Reddit-like experience like Lemmy and Piefed do, while also offering the ability to follow mastodon users and hashtags, and display mastodon content in a more micro-bloggy way.
The downside is few mobile apps support it.
There are more downsides than just that though.
- Small userbase so less prioritization for e.g. funding or direct code contributions
- Its UX is confusing, e.g. there are both upvotes and "other" upvotes, called Increases iirc, and then the same for downvotes too, although ironically actual "votes" aren't the things that influence sorting of results, plus one of those (perhaps Increases but not Reductions?) you can see who did so for an item of content, but not the other.
- Its UI seems to me to be far more geared towards the blog post side of things, and a lot of the time post thumbnails and titles and such are rendered in such a way that don't make so much sense for Lemmy content. e.g. Lemmy titles (such as OP here) are significantly shorter than let's say the title of a news article, which causes a heck of a lot of wasted whitespace.
There is value in optimizing for Threadiverse content, whereas Mbin mostly optimizes for Mastodon and the Threadiverse is an afterthought. As others said, PieFed also federates Mastodon posts if someone tags a community. So it is not surprise that optimization is the opposite there, with the Threadiverse as primary and Mastodon as the afterthought.
I works really well with Mastodon, both making posts and liking/responding to posts. I like that I can check Mastodon and the Threadiverse from one account
top 99 comments