top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

Apple controls the entire stack

It's sad but the truth is: Apple and Microsoft can do this because they have a lot of money. Linux is not funded as it should be, and individual developers have neither the time nor the money to take care of a subject they know nothing about.

I have only found this page on the topic (https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/inclusion-accessibility) but I'm pretty sure it's a niche subject. You need time and money to develop all those features, you need testers and web sites to coordinate your development, and you need doctors and stuff to guide the developers. It's hard for a reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    There has been some noise about the state of accessibility in Linux last year. Seems that things are improving and the Devs of major DEs are taking things more seriously. From a more recent blog post on the topic:

    Developers Are Rising to the Challenge

    Here’s the good news: I’ve talked to developers from GNOME, KDE, and Fedora.

    They get it. And they’re taking it seriously.

    GNOME’s Wayland session is now stable and usable with Orca. KDE is catching up — and has a legally blind developer leading accessibility improvements. COSMIC is building Wayland from scratch with accessibility and global hotkey support in mind. For once, accessibility isn’t just a postscript. It’s in the room where design happens.

    This transition is happening — but we’re not being ignored anymore.

    https://fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/i-want-to-love-linux-it-doesnt-love-me-back-post-4-wayland-is-growing-up-and-now-we-dont-have-a-choice/

    The other posts in that series gives a good overview of previous things as well. Seems that author has been successful in raising awareness about the subject which hopefully will help improve things.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    When it comes to magnifiers, then XFCE may be an option, where you can magnify your desktop almost down to the pixel with just 'alt + mouse wheel.'

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    where you can magnify your desktop almost down to the pixel with just 'alt + mouse wheel.'

    You can do that in Cinnamon as well (via the Accessibility settings); the key configuration is just limited to Alt/Super/Ctrl/Shift for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago
    [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    That's sad but that's not the first time in heard that.

    In the KDE Plasma version 6.5 the screen magnifier work well with, for example Meta+Ctrl+mouse scroll.

    However, for a screen reader I have no idea how it's should work and cannot test.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Is there any hope for accessibility on Linux?

    My guess is about the same hope as for the world at large. [/Cynicism after some ongoing issues with the bank.]

    Potentially even better hope, given it's Free Software, where everybody's free to mend it, using the 4 freedoms assuring we can use, study, share, change the software as we wish. ... Albeit with some non-triviality involved.

    A lot of itches being scratched... but do these successful efforts get shared and integrated upstream, and consistently re-availed? Keep raising awareness. Accessibility features are good even for those who do not have to rely upon them. The more this awareness gets around, the more reliably these features will be present more ubiquitously, and not just a niche implementation or after-thought.

    "Anybody can become disabled at any time."

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    Why would you even say anything in response to this post if you have to start with "I don't have a clue...", implying that you already know your comment is useless? It's just a waste of everybody's time - including yours (and now mine if you don't learn to be more judicious in making comments). I appreciate wanting to be helpful, but unless you actually are then you're just being counterproductive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Explain why you think your suggestion might be helpful in your first comment then, rather than leaving the OP guessing why they should invest the time. Read my profile for an answer to that last part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The threadiverse/lemmy is a niche community in the scheme of things, and talking about issues that impact a small portion of that niche community can often lead to resounding silence. Sometimes, someone taking a best guess, even if not speaking from first hand experience is better than no response at all, as long as they make it clear that they're not speaking from lived experience.

    Of course, the OP may not want to hear from people offering guesses, but even if they don't make that explicit, unlike on reddit or other popular centralised spaces, at least they're unlikely to be swamped with a wave of well intentioned guesses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago

    While that's probably true, I think it's understandable how one can see such a vague, incomplete response as being unhelpful. It just seems so pointless to me to not even give a minimal explanation of why you think it might help - which wasn't done until I complained to that effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago

    Nobody tell this guy that the painting in his living room is HIDEOUS! It would break his heart...

  • source