top 81 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 175 points 1 year ago (6 children)

“I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life.”

  • John Boehner

„Everyone hates Ted“

  • Donald Trump
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 133 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    If you want to see how ignorant some voters can be, there is really no better evidence than Ted Cruz.

    I followed his recent Senate race in Texas. In a campaign speech, Cruz said he was fighting the elite.

    • His father owns an oil company in Canada.
    • He attended a private prep school in Houston. His classmates were Bush family kids.
    • He attended Harvard University and Princeton
    • His wife Heidi Cruz is a top executive at Goldman Sachs

    This guy is fighting the establishment? Are you kidding me? 🤦🤦🤦.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You have to remember it's not about facts, it's about feelings. As I always say, we're all susceptible to that to some extent, but the republicans have it bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I honestly don't understand how he still gets elected here. I would cry systematic election fraud in Texas but the majority of my parents generation seemingly doesn't vote at all. But their parents who just watch Fox News all day sure fucking do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago*

    Rafael doesn't belive in preferred names. Stop calling Rafael, Ted.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But states rights? What happened to states rights?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    States rights was never really an ideal (in general, if it's wrong to allow something in one state, it'd be wrong to allow it in the rest, after all). It was just a thing to bring out whenever the federal government disagreed with something they wanted but some states didn't. But now that they control the federal government, it becomes a liability, so they drop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Why is this foreign born person still in the US? Didn't Trump say he wanted to deport naturalized citizens? Deport Ted Rafael Edward Cruz back to Canada! Send him back!

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 1 year ago (14 children)
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Yes everyone know's a Canadian's shit doesn't stink and the country definitely doesn't have it's own fascism problem.

    Definitely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I dated a Canadian once and you'd have to wait an hour to use the bathroom after her but maybe that was because she was a vegan.

    Anyways what are those shifty Canadians up to up there?

    What's the fascism problem you're talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    There are a handful of loud Maple MAGAs that have been continually losing elections. So yeah, there's some of that here. However, OP is just salty that the US is a fiery shitshow and is deflecting.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Wow you sure know a lot about Canada. You must have been here a long time, huh? Surely your opinion is based on experience and a deep understanding of our culture. There's no way that opinion is based on internet discourse.

    Canadians are very well aware of how we've treated and continue to treat Indigenous people. There's an active movement towards reconciliation and self governance. Canadians are not ignorant of the history or the current situation. You are.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I thought the 1 vote had to be the Zodiac killer Ted Cruz, but no:

    The one vote backing moratorium on state AI laws came from Thom Tillis, not Cruz.

    Did he just not get the memo, or is he that paid off?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So unless my math is wrong there are 100 senators. And if the only yes vote was my own lovely senator Tillis, Cruz voted against his own thing?!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    is that the self proclaimed black Nazi?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The one vote backing moratorium on state AI laws came from Thom Tillis, not Cruz.

    🤣🤣🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    Rafael Cruz hates Rafael Cruz so much that he voted against his own amendment.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Ted Cruz can go fuck himself.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    lol he even voted against his own plan. Imagine being the schmuck who was the one dissenting vote

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So what I'm hearing is this is a bill to distract from more important things and to delay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    99 problems but this bitch ain't one.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    ? I don't see them trying to sneak an AI regulation ban again anytime soon. This is about the strongest bipartisan support against anything I can recall in my life.

    Many of the people that voted against this are to blame for many of the other problems we are about to be hit with.

    However, of all the scary shit in that bill, this was one of the most concerning to me. Specifically in terms of irreversibility to the damage it would do, the creation of national AI surveillance databases being built across the country, and the kind of environmental and safety regulations that will have to be ignored in order to power them.

    The closest thing to hope, I hold for my own state, is that I just hope whatever lesson we ended up serve as in future history books isn't on the same scale or worse than Chernobyl.

    I can breathe a little easier knowing that the entire country won't be facing a mandatory federal law demanding they be more like Louisiana in terms of deregulation in order to make a terrible idea actually profitable, regardless of how many people it hurts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As in Cruz wasn’t a problem this time.

    He’s an eternal cunt and will be a problem again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So how much did this cost?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Ted Cruz. The ULTIMATE bottom.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Nothing wrong with bottoming…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Sure the fuck is when Trump is your top.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    It’s not bottoming when there’s no consent. Then it’s rape.

    Cruz totally consents in this case, but as a generality, bottoming is juuuuust fine…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Of course. Also, thanks Obama!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Stop giving broadband funds globally, it's just squandered, it needs to be manually voted on and approved per project.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Probably doesn't care, already made his paycheck after all

  • source
  • I only use AI to make shitty furry porn. It needs to be regulated.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    This is not good news, because it was up to debate.

    Efit: well, ok, it was Ted Cruz after all.

  • source
  • "i like ted cruz more than most of my other colleagues like ted cruz and i hate ted cruz"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Was Ted the 1 vote or was he in Cancun for the roll call?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    ah Ted Cruz... the infected pimple in the ass that is the GOP

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Some nuance I read recently: The argument from above is basically that they want Ai research to continue as it has national security value. Therefore, any limitations or regulations to AI research should only happen on a federal level.

    The idea is that all states should share the same playing field so that any researchers do not have to treat states differently.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    No, that's the rationalization. They admin wants to use palantir to collect data on American citizens, including giving ICE mobile camera installations to do face tracking. They want to do a 1984, and they don't want any speed bumps from the states

    Also, AI companies gave Trump money and there's talk of restricting their power/water access to data centers to prioritize the people living nearby

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I don’t buy it.

    A diversity of regulatory approaches especially in such a complex subject really does need the 50 state laboratory.

    In fact because states are smaller markets, it might encourage the development of more smaller companies. A complex regulatory landscape gives an efficiency edge to players who focus product development in specific states.

    Anything to keep this shitshow happening in a more democratic way is fine by me. Anthropic and that Altman fellow seem so desperately out of touch with humanity, I welcome any disadvantages we can give them.

  • source
  • parent
  • I'm sorry, but that's bullshit. This would have been the inverse of how a federal government is supposed to work. Rather than keeping individuals from being exploited at the state level, the exploiters are now at the federal level creating policy. They've had a plan in place since Trump's first term, and they don't want blue states interfering.

    Governors of states are already looking to remove federal safety regulations to build small modular nuclear reactors in order to power these dumb fucking data centers they will likely be using to store very unethical surveillance data.

    They are also planning to use AI to more efficiently build nuclear reactors. While removing federal oversight and safety regulations that have been in place for 50 years... What could possibly go wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago