top 82 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 134 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    It's true! Trump hasn't sent the army after anyone! Just ICE, CBP, and the National Guard!

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    the National Guard is part of the army

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    PolitiFact | Trump said that Gov. Tim Walz didn’t call in the National Guard in 2020. Walz’s order shows he did.

    Tim Walz signed an executive order May 28, 2020, calling up the Minnesota National Guard to respond to riots

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/aug/07/donald-trump/trump-said-that-gov-tim-walz-didnt-call-in-the-nat/

    oh no, anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Did someone print this out and leave it in the sun before linking it here?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 67 points 9 months ago (21 children)

    I don't understand why people can't understand that multiple things can be true.

    Someone can have voted for Harris, donated to her campaign, preferred her to be president, felt that personally their own lives would have been better if Harris were president, and also be disgusted that Harris is pro-genocide.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    I guess my question is whether "reluctant" (yet unrepentant) Trump voters ought to be held responsible for the awful shit Trump does, for the things that they were aware of but did not consider to be a deal-breaker. Because I think they should, and I think it's perfectly valid to criticize "reluctant" Kamala voters on the exact same basis.

    Ultimately, you make a decision, and if your reservations about a candidate are not significant enough to be represented in that decision, then do they really matter? Do they matter enough that other people ought to be expected to care about them? "Libertarians" who vote Republican are just Republicans, they don't consider their differences significant enough to break with them, so why should I bother to make a distinction?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    my question is whether "reluctant" (yet unrepentant) Trump voters ought to be held responsible for the awful shit Trump does, for the things that they were aware of but did not consider to be a deal-breaker

    The fact that they were aware of the awful things Trump said he would do, believed that he would do them, and it wasn't a deal breaker is more than enough to hold them responsible. (And to hold them in contempt)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    Centrists will never understand this.

    They also cannot understand that someone can say something centrists want is a losing issue and still be willing to vote for a centrist candidate, while being able to notice that they're gonna lose if they keep it up.

    Also explains the reaction to Mamdani. Centrists didn't get the sex pest they wanted and went from "blue no matter who" to "party unity my ass" immediately. No progressive legislators badmouthed harris like gillibrand did with her disgusting Islamophobic attacks against Mamdani.

    Centrists think everyone is like they are, inasmuch as they don't believe at all in their stated principles and will vote third party if they don't get their very first choice. We saw this in 2008 as well when they formed a fucking PAC to elect mccain because they didn't want to vote for a black man. For all the blame they throw at the left for 2016 and 2024, progressives never formed a PAC to elect trump. But if Sanders had won the nomination in 2016 or 2020, I have no doubt that we would have seen centrists campaigning for trump like we saw them campaigning for cuomo and mccain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    probably the part where she doesn't care that people are disgusted by her being pro-genocide

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

    There would be no ice raids like this all over the country. No tarrifs. No allies lost due to insults and threats. No threats against lgbtq+, no concentration camps for immigrants(or no newer ones from bidens term. No loss of Nato. No that of nuclear proliferation. Stronger Ukraine. And less support for Israel and more support for Palestine though obviously not to the level needed.

    It's like being ok with Hitler because MacArthur Churchill hated Indians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Sure. But this goes right back to the idea that centrists can't imagine anyone thinks, believes, or acts differently than they do.

    You clearly follow utilitarian ethics. But others don't. Seriously, two of the main branches of ethical philosophy are utilitarianism and respect for persons. You clearly follow, or at least pretend you follow, utilitarian ethics. But moral philosophers have long recognized the severe limitations on judging everything based on only the greater good. Most of histories greatest atrocities were done in the name of utilitarian ethics. Hell, everything Trump does is baed on utilitarianism, completely rejecting the respect for persons branch of ethical philosophy. Fucking Mengele justified what he did based on appealing to the greater good.

    A respect for persons framework in voting would say that true red lines do exist. You can't just look at the utilitarian consequences of your vote; you have to ask if the candidate you're voting for has truly done something unforgiveable.

    When you solely focus on utilitarian principles, you are ironically aligning yourself morally with MAGA far more than you know. You both say the ends justify the means.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    And less support for Israel and more support for Palestine though obviously not to the level needed.

    You don't know that. Regardless, I guess this all could have been avoided had Harris not alienated her own constituency by playing a game of Who's the bigger narcissist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I can confidently say that israel receives more support and less restraint with Trump than anyone else. Literally. He loves tyrants.

    this isn't some wild conjecture.

    Regardless, I guess this all could have been avoided had Harris not alienated her own constituency by playing a game of Who’s the bigger narcissist.

    yeah and kerry was a commie and dean's scream should have ended his campaign. there's always some great reason to dump solid candidates when you believe BULLSHIT

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    "BULLSHIT" like believing Harris would be better on Palestine?

    or

    "BULLSHIT" like the 2020 Democratic Primary Results -The last primary she participated in and concidentally where she received less than 1% of the vote?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago

    keep changing the subject.

    you can choose to be apathetic, you can choose to stick your head in the sand, but it won't change the fact that kids in palestine would be better off today - and now they're getting trump fucked. great fucking job

    you can choose to ignore reality, you seem very experienced there

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So clearly you prefer what is happening now. This is what you wanted? Americans gunned down in the streets by federal occupiers? A president literally invading foreign countries for the expressed purpose of taking their oil? Federal agencies adopting Nazi and white nationalist slogans? I swear to fucking Christ, leftists hate anything that they don't think is left enough and it will lead to the world burning down. You have to compromise. You CANNOT have everything you want in this life. It will NEVER be perfect. And if we don't accept that fact and work with what we are given, it will be taken away from us entirely.

    I don't want to see genocide happen either. But we really ought to fix our own shit before we try to fix the rest of the world. America is not special. It should not be our job to police the world like we had in the past. Remove the log in your own eye and all that jazz. Be mad, but compromise. Otherwise we will be nothing at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Yeah, it was pretty simple for anyone capable of making decisions without deferring entirely to their feelings.

    The stats prove Dems are better for our economy (and rights). We were coming off a legislatively successful Democrat presidency. Serious strides were made for the working class and we were recovering from the pandemic better than any other 1st world nation. The Dem candidate was a career prosecutor with a doctorate in law.

    On the other hand we had the side that the stats show are awful for our economy (and war). The candidate was an already failed president with two impeachments and an insurrection under his belt. With a doctorate in nothing but dipshittery.

    You have to be pretty stupid to NOT go with option 1, including by staying home or voting for a 3rd party candidate with absolutely ZERO possibility of winning. Regardless of whether you're mad that they're maintining an allegiance with a foreign nation you aren't exactly happy with. Foreign affairs aren't exactly simple. Especially with an ally you want to keep for their strategic geopolitical position.

    But, as we've learned, most Americans prefer to think with their feelings instead of their intellect. And now gestures broadly.

    I just don't see how things are going to get better with a nation full of people this dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    They're half right. ICE is A secret police force, not an army.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Staffed mostly by ex-military. Funded by the federal budget like the military. Use military grade weapons and armor. Move in packs like their army training.

    If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    The Hill should try keeping its dipshit opinions to itself.

    This shit was obvious to anyone with a functional brain.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    torn between upvoting because funny and downvoting because politics meme outside of !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 43 points 10 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago

    3rd party voters can go fuck themselves.

    Just as dumb as MAGA.

    Actually probably more dumb because they recognized the Trump threat, then proceeded to help him anyway.

    FACT: The 3rd party candidate with the MOST votes only got half of a single percent of the total votes cast. 3RD PARTY CANDIDATES CANNOT WIN THE PRESIDENCY. Vote for 3rd party in local/state elections. It's STUPID AS FUUUUUUUUUCK to vote for one for president.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -62 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    The real pedos, are the ones who try to turn kids gay/trans. Trump is a saint by comparision

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (4 children)
    1. It's letting them be gay/trans if they want to
    2. this has nothing to do with pedo
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -37 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It’s letting them be gay/trans if they want to

    SOme people can't become gay/trans otherwise they'll be kicked our from their family. For a European this may not mean much, but for most cultures, this is social suicide. We don't get a choice lol

    this has nothing to do with pedo This dude called me a pedo voter. I'm just pointing out, that he thinks teachers should give HRT to kids without parental consent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    People that think being gay is a choice scare me. It takes a lower form of intelligence and a truly weak grasp on both science and religion for them to decide their opinion overrides both. Science: Its just how they are. Religion: God made it.

    Why not go throw stones at disabled children? The same principle applies. Science: Well, that just happens, its how they are. Religion: God made that, its his will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    People who think being gay is a choice are either gay and in complete denial or bi, because as a straight man, while I could choose to have sex with another man, it has negative appeal to me. Like not just no attraction, but repulsion.

    So either they are in denial about their own sexuality (especially the ones that make comments about vaginas being gross), or they are so stupid they listen to their thought leaders over their own experience of it not being a choice but biologically imprinted deep in their psyche.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

    Why did she spend so much time courting Republicans? It's a mystery

    Was it was the billion dollars she "raised" in a few months? Trump raised about 900 million in four years, she raised a billion in months. Unprecedented.

    Standard US political wisdom reveals that neither D (30%) or Rs (30%) can win an election without Independent voters (40% of voters). So, you need to have an independent issue or three to get enough votes to win.

    Kamala only spent a few months, and she spent a lot of it on Republicans (various articles about this before election, Politico, Hill). The math doesn't work, that's not how you win elections. That's not how anyone wins elections. It would have been unprecedented for her to win, also.

    I think she took a knee, if you can come up with another reason I would love to hear it, for real. This is very disturbing to me and I wish I had never come to this conclusion, but can think of no other reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Why did she spend so much time courting Republicans? It's a mystery

    Not a mystery. That's what the overpriced consultants the DNC hired told them to do. They said to stop using the slogan never back and told Tim Walz to stop calling Trump and Vance weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Which is weird in and of itself because that was working

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Exactly. But, you don't get paid to say, keep doing what you're doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 13 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Admin of db0: "yeah, well Kamala would have double sent the army"

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 9 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    ...what evidence do you have of what decisions Harris would have made differently in terms of being unable to force ceasefires? Biden did within his last couple months in office. She campaigned on backing a six week deal. It wasn't perfect, but I'm struggling to understand your argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Lol this article supports that Biden was part of the negotiations that Trump then just continued. I didn't know Biden also paused military aid at one point. So thank you for further weakening your claims I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    This is a Trump administration classic. Always trying to take credit for the works of others. This recent Minnesota corruption scandal started back in Biden's DOJ. So it was already an ongoing investigation.

    Even before that the local authorities were investigating. The Trump administration tries to make it out like it is some revelation they came up with.

    Of course this administration needs some kind of anti-corruption win because they have never delivered their promise about reducing corruption. Instead, they have torn apart every agency that uncovers corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Good thing we have more than two feasible options in first past the post voting so we can vote for.... Jill Stein, I guess. /s

    Seriously, I hear a lot of bitching and moaning and hard lining, but no actual realistic solutions from people like you. I'd love to live in a world where I can draw all of my neat little ideological lines and have great candidates and have my vote actually matter. That's not our fucking world, though, and acting like other people are approving of genocide because they voted for the lesser evil when they didn't have any feasible better option doesn't endear people to your cause. It makes you look like an asshole that can't unbury your head from your own ideology enough to take a breath of the same putrid air that everyone else is having to breathe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›