So, if approached by DHS, assume deadly intent, sounds like.

The report is especially scathing in its critique of agents who’ve stood in front of moving vehicles, recommending that they “get out of the way…as opposed to intentionally assuming a position in front of such vehicles.” The authors add:

It should be recognized that a half-ounce (200-grain) bullet is unlikely to stop a 4,000-pound moving vehicle, and if the driver…is disabled by a bullet, the vehicle will become a totally unguided threat… Obviously, shooting at a moving vehicle can pose a risk to bystanders including other agents.

That's the extra stupidness of this who "self-defense" claim. Even if the guy was actually in danger, even if it had actually been her intent to mow him down... the response was not defensive in the slightest. The danger was a moving vehicle that might be intended to hit him His response was to ensure that vehicle kept moving, and to now do so completely aimlessly and make it an even bigger threat, while making sure that at minimum one person died in the process. And that's beside the fact that he voluntarily walked right into the only path her vehicle could have taken before shooting her. What a masterful defensive strategist you are.

"Well I thought the guy was gonna shoot me with his revolver, so I shot him in the face first, then I took his revolver, gave the cylinder a spin, put the barrel to my temple and pulled the trigger. When that chamber proved to be unloaded, I started flipping the gun wildly and pulling the trigger more in random directions to make sure the rest of the chambers were cleared. Thank god for my quick thinking. Defense."

Haven't many of these people called for the right to run over protestors ?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/desantis-says-protesters-on-roadways-can-be-run-over-by-drivers-is-that-true/ar-AA1GFm3D

Hopefully a few get run over

This could be really big if it can be used in court in the Minneapolis ICE shooting.

So the behavior that we are seeing spans political leaders. This shows it was even a problem under Obama and the tactic didn't change there's just more raids so we have more problems.

That could be a justification that Congress could use to stop ice deployments until they are better trained or since money is such a problem disband them.

This article is from 2014.

It's important, but also vital to provide context, as the headline makes it sound current.

When I was in the police (uk) we were told, repeatedly and explicitly, don't ever stand in front of, or at the rear of a suspect vehicle.

Its common fucking sense.

I suppose that anyone could do the same thing to them.

OP it is the wrong community, it should be in the onion, right? Right? /s

How hard is it to install a bulletproof windshield? Asking for a friend.

Of course they did. I'm sure others have noticed the trend. Anything for these cosplay LEO shitbags to use their toys.

But Hunter Biden's laptop!

We need a boomer to tell us this isn’t real. Somebody page Nextdoor.

Each time we see an act of impunity, it only empowers individuals to react as if each encounter is deadly. I'm not trained to handle masked and armed men, screaming, swearing, and storming my vehicle. I only know that my options are to either allow these strange men to kidnap me or get shot. If it's a death sentence, why leave control to them? Why shouldn't I buy a firearm and start target practice? These masked men are cowards inside, externalizing their fear onto innocent civilians. It's bullshit and one day it'll happen to me or you or someone you know. Anyone of us will be dead and no notion of peace will fix it, while they are free to manipulate your murder into a convenient story that supports the fascist narrative. They are using fascism to enact violence. We've voiced our dissent, but it continues to fester and grow. We've seen history. We know what works.

So is this part of rhwir training, or are rhwy all idiots violating DOJ policy.