all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

47?!

Fucking, FORTY-SEVEN?!?!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago

    Great, that will show him not to do that again to Venuzuela... They need to vote to preemptively stop him from doing it elsewhere too. Buuuuut the president also has to sign the order if it even passes for it to take effect which is probably a realistic scenario.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Good. Now do the same blocking trump from using the military against Greenland, and fast!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Ok, but when he does, who's going to stop him?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Per the system we have, impeachment and removal from office for breaking the law. 16 additional senators (than what passed the resolution) would need to flip for it to matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    No one is stopping him if he does it anyway.

    So far people have tried to say "Hey you can't do that", even wrote 'strong letters', but he clearly doesn't give a fuck. And people are like: "ah well, I tried 🤷, maybe he'll listen the next time he commits a crime and I ask him to stop".

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    so he vetoes and starts his war in earnest

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    lol, as if that's gonna do anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment