pornhub usage statistics

pornhub kinda sucks btw

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

Year of the privacy conscious Linux Wank

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Lots of jurisdictions are blocking the site now, necessitating VPNs to access the site.

    There's probably a higher percentage of Linux adoption among VPN users.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 10 months ago

    Presumably caused by people browsing on their blow-off-some-steam deck

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    When I first saw this I didn’t realize it was for PornHub and was just stoked for the year of the Linux desktop lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    I think avenue Q said it best, "The internet is for porn".

    Sure, PornHub is not the only thing you can do on the Internet. Some of the more formal studies are functionally run by marketing groups, who are likely more skewed to advertising demographics.

    Example: the fundamental backbone of the internet upgraded as part of the CERN Large Hadron Collider project construction, to distribute the massive amount research data being generated to scientists across the world - but Cloudflare doesn't count that traffic when preparing it's statistics)

    All I'm saying is: you could do a lot worse than PornHub as a research authority for trends in this subject.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Who tf is accessing the hub on a chromebook? Never seen an adult use one, so I sure hope it isn't teenagers on their school laptop . . .

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Have you ever seen any other adult access "the hub" on any operating system?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I count 99.8% in this chart...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I'm curious why Chrome OS had such a big drop?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    My Chromebook self-destructed a couple years ago and nearly burned our house down. That thing also was the shortest lived computer I've ever owned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yikes!

    What brand was that garbage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Shoot, probably Dell? This was a few years ago, but it looked just like the Dell ones that are currently on the market.

    Also, the house still has a vague burnt plastic and lithium smell, especially noticeable when I've been away for a day or so. I think our couch absorbed all that smoke smell :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)

    those numbers do not add up to 100% again?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    change in share, not total share. or are you referring to the .2% rounding error?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    no, not the rounding error: keep in mind, i am a statistic noob: The total amount of plus and minus in the bar chart should cancel eachother out because otherwise all useres wouldnt be 100% which sounds odd.

    But as stated in the other reply i am really a noob and just read the wikipedia on precetnage points.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    so the bottom line, i think the quantity (not percentage) of all the changes nets out to zero, so for simplicity's sake let's pretend there's no chrome, mac, or other. since there are so many more windows users a 1.7% drop in windows is (for the sake of this example) the same as the 22.4% increase in linux users. when you convert away from percentages, you'll see a quantity that represents the same number, but since you have to divide by the starting number of users and windows had so many more... am i making sense?

    fuck, i'm high. am i even right? it's been a few decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I think it's relative change and not percentage points, from quick mental math that seems to add up. Very weird choice, maybe trying to inflate the perceived increase in linux users. So it would be a change of a bit more than +1 percentage point for linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Lets go Gentoo

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    OS/2 Warp still doing numbers!

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Linux was at -16.1% before?

    Edit: y'all, my point is that the bar graph at the bottom could be better displayed as percentage points in order to show comparable changes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments