top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 198 points 10 months ago (24 children)

Back to the days of rip out the head unit and stick one in that does have the features you want?

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 114 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    I imagine they’ll try to make this increasingly difficult; maybe even impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    It already is for a lot of modern cars. Especially EVs. I imagine they are so tied into the functionality of the car that it makes the vehicle impossible to drive without the OEM headunit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Couldn't a savvy user just find an exploitable firmware revision, never connect the vehicle to the internet, and install aftermarket software or hardware to bypass the authentication checks? It would be more of a pain in the ass than the previous drop in system, but I'd imagine it's possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Depends on how heavily things are locked down, and how much money this tech-savvy person is willing to risk on a bricked automobile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    The vehicle comes from the factory connected to the internet.

    You'd have to find the exploit before they do, and it would be hard to replicate because once they find out, the only cars vulnerable to your exploit are ones manufactured before the patch who have been disconnected from the internet (which is like 2 cars).

    It's theoretically possible but very hard to replicate. And on top of that theres always the risk of the car manufacturer voiding the warranty on your $50k vehicle and/or cozying up to your insurance company and convincing them any damage is a result of you preventing their systems from running as intended.

    It's a messy high risk low reward game to play. Better option is to just buy a different car if you can.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Right, but that requires somebody to find and document exploitable firmware revisions, create and distribute hardware/software to exploit them, develop the aftermarket software/hardware, and all that potentially separately for each car model. And then that just becomes a war with the manufacturers, who might try to update their firmware more aggressively, lock things down more, and threaten/sue people working on such things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I doubt it will be completely impossible - we'd just be returning to a situation similar to game consoles and modchips - any aftermarket parts need to lie to the "authentication" checks in place first.

    I would expect that certain aftermarket groups would specialize based on popular models, maybe even prioritizing models designed to be interoperable with others design and parts wise (Subaru and perhaps Toyota comes to mind).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    If it doesn't affect emissions those mod chips will not violate your warrantee - magnuson-moss was writen decades ago to protect replacing your factory radio. There are a number of other laws around third party access to car diagnostics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I just had a little magnetic clip for my air vent where I could attach my phone and put up a map.

    I'd sooner go back to doing that than use a "Gemini-based AI assistant" in my fucking car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I'd rip out the touch screen SO fast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    And then lose control of numerous functions of your car.
    It's simply not an option in modern cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That's the "why I can't do it" part.

    But if it was possible to get knobs and buttons for everything and a small-ish screen only for info, I'd take that. I'd pay for that. Touch screens are dangerous. I'd at most be comfortable to swipe on the screen to show different infos like GPS, temperature/airflow, music/radio. Otherwise I want buttons and knobs with little lights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    I 100% understand what you mean. I just bought a VW ID.4, and IMO they have a good balance. Everything needed for normal driving is handled with buttons, and although some are touch, they do have haptic feedback, and it works OK IMO.
    I was looking at the Skoda Enyaq, because it has traditional buttons and more things operated through them.
    But it cost about €5000 extra for the same features as is in our fully equipped ID.4 when used and 4 years old. But now I'm happy we chose the ID.4 instead of an Enyaq with fewer features. Because the ID.4 works way better than I expected.
    It's crazy and previously absolutely unheard of that the Skoda version of a similar car to a genuine VW is more expensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    And replace it with what? You can't just hot glue knobs on the center console and expect them to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    That's the "why I can't do it" part.

    But if it was possible to get knobs and buttons for everything and a small-ish screen only for info, I'd take that. I'd pay for that. Touch screens are dangerous. I'd at most be comfortable to swipe on the screen to show different infos like GPS, temperature/airflow, music/radio. Otherwise I want buttons and knobs with little lights.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 347 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Rent seeking behavior. They want subscription revenue instead of wanting to deliver what consumers want.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 213 points 10 months ago

    For the most part, it's believed that carmakers are doing way with Android Auto support simply as a way to expand their control over user data. Because Android Auto utilizes your phone's connection, all of the data that runs through it goes straight to Android and the phone manufacturer. So, by utilizing built-in systems, the car manufacturers would indeed be able to collect more data about how you use the systems in place, while also possibly getting more money out of you through subscriptions.

    You are unfortunately correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's not free you know.

    Yes, the software doesn't cost anything but the chipset is supplied by a single manufacturer Qualcomm and costs a bomb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    That's such an obvious deflection, though. My last car was a GM vehicle, with built-in OnStar right there in the box behind the rearview mirror. Built into the price I paid was hardware I didn't want, didn't pay a subscription for, yet was collecting my driving data and selling it.

    Building a functionally useful infotainment system to replace Android Auto, with all of the bells and whistles needed to complete, is going to cost them the same or more. The difference is the rent seeking behavior, the demand for subscriptions, and getting more opportunities to spy on their customers for profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Removing smartphone integration from its vehicles opens the door for GM to grow its in-vehicle subscription revenue. Yep 💩

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago

    Money.

    There I wrote the whole article in one word.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Because GM sucks.

    People aren't asking for much. People just want their phone navigation and music controls displayed onto the infotainment. Won't consider any car that cannot afford me this tiny bit of convenience for the sake of nickel and diming me.

    And if every car manufacturer starts forcing me to adopt their own stupid software I'll just buy a fucking phone holder.

    And GM has shitty reliability anyways.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    I wish I could develop my own apps on my own car. I mean I own the car.. why can't I "sideload" my own created apps? Their apps are sht anyways.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You probably can, just nobody bothers to do it. My Subaru has installable apps. Hell older Hondas (and possibly current ones) just run android. You can even get to the regular android UI on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    I'm pretty sure the sofware that is running on the information entertainment system from VW is fully proprietary without any way of flashing it with a custom rom or running Linux on it.

    I'm not taking about connecting other devices like apple or android phone to this system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    You can, but it's a Google filled minefield. A good view of it is reading into all of the trouble of using Android Auto in GrapheneOS without destroying all the privacy protections. It's essentially impossible to get navigation going without doing so, but audio for music and phone calls can be done with some hoop jumping. You're still probably better off just using bluetooth though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    There are open source navigation apps. No need for google.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    No, you misunderstand what I was trying to say, so I probably didn't communicate it well. You cannot use any of them, open source or not, without allowing the Google Play Services some rather invasive permissions. That's the Google I was referring to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Best thing to do is remove google play services if at all possible. Installing microg will solve most issues. This of course means rooting the device. Which is admittedly not an easy task when dealing with head units.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    GM are saying that their customers want a more seamless integration. Shareholders are slavering at the idea of owners collared to their subscription system. Buyers need to stop buying cars with stupid subscriptions. My 2nd hand BMW has a heated steering wheel that requires an annual fee to use. Nope, heated gloves are the solution!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    As a BMW tech, what car has a subscription for the heated wheel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Could it be money?

    It's money, isn't it?!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    It's not money. The executives of these companies revealed the reason they are doing this is because they believe they can provide a better end user experience. They wouldn't lie would they?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    We need a Linux OS and DE for cars

    i use carch btw

    KDE Plasma Car: can use Customize Panel to move around physical parts of the car (HELP the steering wheel is inside the engine somehow HOWDOIFIXTHIS)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 10 months ago

    So manufacturers can bill you monthly for the same features...

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Why I like Android Auto:

    • I can plan my route on my phone at home and see the map on the big screen instead the little phone ui, or worse putting in the adress manually with the keyboard wheel in Korean instead of copy and pasting it from the Element chat
    • I already have all my music on my phone, I don't want to copy and organize it again for hours in my car
    • I already have integration with many apps on my phone, I don't want to set everything up again on the car, especially I can't copy and paste my long ass passwords from my KeePassXC into the car and need to painstakingly put in every password with their clunky keyboard, if they even have a keyboard.

    I could go on forever. But as long as I can connect bluetooth and set up my phone somewhere so I can see the map while driving I'll be OK. The worst part, at work what I do is car infotainment system software, but it never has any of the features I would want from a car.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I am always surprised I don't hear more discussion about Automotive Grade Linux.

    https://www.automotivelinux.org/

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Because it's corporate controlled embedded Linux, you aren't guaranteed any freedom or control. Hell you aren't even guaranteed access to a debug menu. Technically a car manufacturer could make a open a free car running embedded Linux that does give you freedom but the chances are absurdly low.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Man, that sounds INCREDIBLE!!! Never heard of this! Linux on my pc, my laptop, my phone, and now my CAR! 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    That's what most? cars used for a long time (there is also GENIVI)

    Many manufacturers are switching to Android as the base OS so they can just hire app developers rather than developers that know other UI toolkits

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    oh look another problem I'm too poor to have

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -112 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 42 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I won’t buy a car without CarPlay.

    My current car has it and I love it. So I imagine Android users feel the same way.

    If there is truly no option, then my phone is getting the window/airvent mount option.

    I’ll never subscribe to their bs.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    My car is from the 2010s.

    I bought a GPS looking screen for $40 that has android auto and carplay. I already have Bluetooth added onto the radio for audio streaming.

    Works perfectly for GPS off of my phone and as a media controller.

    Only thing I'm missing is steering wheel controls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I’m in a country where stuff in the car is not regulated as much as the US.

    One of my ride share drivers had basically a 13” android tablet instead of the stock radio in the car 😂

    It was all hooked up to the car to act as a legit part of the car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah this is the kind of shit I was looking forward to when I got into driving in the 2000s. But then car manufacturers started doing thier own non standard radios.

    Then the car mod communities made kits to for a dual bay fit.

    Then the corpos made radios required to service the car...

    No regulations to protect the consumers let them do what they want.

    The car part of the car should be completely independent of the entertainment part of the car. Fuckers.

    The line can get blurry when you talk about EVs but protections should still be possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The third parties would win sueing car makers for requiring the radio for diagnostics. anti-monopoly and warranty laws protect moding you car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'll just take a bluetooth battery powered speaker in my car if they keep locking it down

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Honestly, I think consumers allowing manufacturers to start integrating screens into cars was a mistake.

    Knobs and dials are way easier to nevigate blind (whilst focusing on the road like we're meant to), and none of that stops you plugging in your own third party device for other features, or replacing the headboard yourself.

    Giant tablets with complex menus are dangerous to drivers, and only serve to milk the consumer for things they already had access to in their car as standard not 10 years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    The bigger and more intrusive screens have gotten, the more sales of new cars have flagged. People are sick of them, and lawmakers are starting to catch up on regulating physical controls back into vehicles.

    The last time I bought a car one of my stipulations was a car no newer than 2016 because that was the last year that RAV4s had the small screens in the middle of the dashboard instead of mounted practically on the windshield, and the guy at the dealership that I talked to said that practically everybody who came in looking to buy a car had similar sentiments. People generally hate the big, intrusive screens, it's just that car makers aren't making any other options and then claim that that's what people want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    The consumers did not allow anything. This is the crap they were eventually forced to buy due to lack of any other options. Electro-mechanical-chemical vehicle with a delco radio should be enough. We adopt new tech because it exists, not because we should.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago*

    Yes. It needs heavy regulation, physical buttons is all the driver should have access to.

    We also need to ban subscription services in vehicles.

    Consumers cannot be trusted to spend responsibly and look out for their best interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I can't wait to get a rental car that doesn't allow me to use my own maps.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›