top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 138 points 10 months ago

Not all of them are like this. At least one isn't.

  • source
  • [–] 118 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I choose to believe that the people who did this aren't idiots, but heroes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 106 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    This has happened before. Back when I used to browse the armpit of the internet there were classified military docs that had the same technique used.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    reddit is the armpit. 4chan is the unwashed taint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    So that makes Lemmy what? The smeggy bellend?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Huh, guess we don't do self deprecation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I don't think you're all of Lemmy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Actually that guy is all of Lemmy, the rest of us are a hive mind. Blorp blurrp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I find it funny that it took a few days for this to come out. That's the very first thing I try if I see a big black box censoring something in a PDF or webpage is highlight to see if there's text under there (practice from reading SCP Wiki and various forums with fun formatting options). Heck I randomly highlight as I read enough I'd probably even find that it was incorrectly redacted without even trying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    You can do that for SCPs!? I have been reading that forever and now I feel dumb

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Only some - default is just black boxes. I remember at least one where the redactions were removed on click per word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Yeah, but not marked as spoilers - but it was integrated into the story. sadly i can't remember which SCP it was, i am pretty sure it was in Series 4 (so somewhere between 3000 and 4000). I am reading SCPs on and off again, and am currently around scp 4800, so it's been a few months that i saw it.

    E: I just remembered one SCP which emulated an terminal, where you were able to remove the redactions by editing the proposed file name to open from a level 4 file to a level 5, that one was pretty cool!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    The first set (with nothing but blacked out pages) was properly redacted and in-fact contained no text data whatsoever. I think this is from the more recent files including the ones that were accidentally uploaded and pulled an hour later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 98 points 10 months ago

    I thought this was just gonna be made up, but it's true!!!

    Go to this document and look for the text "Defendants Kahn and Indyke controlled and directed the activities of the other entities and personal bank accounts of Epstein" so you can get to the part with redactions.

    Copy the redactions with Ctrl + C. Paste the redactions into either Notepad or another text editor that doesn't support advanced formatting like highlights.

    Before:
    image

    After: (in notepad)
    image

  • source
  • [–] 86 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I wonder if this was intentional? Maybe the FBI agent assigned to this file knew the whole censor thing was a huge fiasco and simply did this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Deep down, I sincerely hope that it's malicious compliance in favor of getting the truth out.

    That said, I absolutely will cop to dangerous blood-levels of copium here. Living in a kakistocracy so completely top-to-bottom incompetent as to do this by accident, is a level of peril that I'm not equipped to handle right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I really hope this is malicious compliance and not incompetence...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    teacher here. I blacked out words in a text for some test. kid held it up to the light. could read every word. was a pdf made in word.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    Also, I wonder if you can use brute force for a lot of name reductions. You know, have a list of highly suspicious names, set the same font and size of the surrounding text, and try to see if it fits in the black box.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Yes yes you can let's spin up the old ml machine and a copy of python3 just like our grandfather's did

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    This is going to look obvious in hindsight but perhaps people should have kept this to themselves until every single Epstein file had been released. Because now the DOJ is just going to do their best to fix the problem.

    Not that that saying much these guys are the fucking keystone cops.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I think there were probably several people that found this before that didn't say anything for this reason.

    I posted it on here because once it's trending on TikTok and Bsky that ship has sailed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I wasn't specifically referring to you. I just meant that people in general who've discovered this exploit maybe should have collectively kept it to themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There's several pages that are just completely black that it's like they drew a big black square with paint or they just copy pasted the same page probably

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    they drew a big black square with paint

    I have insider knowledge that that's exactly how this image was made. [OC] please share it because I think the format is funny and would love to see it catch on

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago

    Guys. This is called resistance. These people are govt employees. We go through literally yearly training on maintaining classified documents. This wasn't gross incompetence, it was fucking intentional. They knew they could do it because they knew leadership was too fucking stupid to check it properly. Believe it or not the govt is largely run by people, just like you and I. We are doing what we can where we can.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago

    Shame this fuck-up only happened in some of the pages.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    we're all so blessed that autocracy is so stupid

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago

    There is nothing trumps admin can't fuck up. Its actually impressive.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    THEY DID IT AGAIN

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    You can compare some of the redactions here

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    More than likely, you just had Eric doing these certain files. See Eric was pulled in from field work to help redact. Probably used word 2 or 3 times in his life and hates email.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Malicious compliance on the part of some DOJ intern maybe?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    We needed to be quiet about this until they released all the tranches so that they're all readable but nooo someone had to go and tweet about it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago*

    Happens all the time in the legal field. I once got a document in discovery that inverted the proper redactions. It was a roster of identifying information, all unredacted except for the actual relevant person in the case — that was redacted. 🤣

    Redacting with black boxes over text is more common of a mistake than that.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago
    [–] 6 points 10 months ago*

    I mean, are there tech literate MAGAts who would read the Epstein files to test their convictions?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    There's a tool called pdftotext...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    It counts if it is black i guess

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    That's disparaging to actual nerds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments