🀷

all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 11 months ago (13 children)

Heart wants walkability and not get hit by cars

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

    it's a very calm dead-end street with maybe 8 houses and iirc speed is limited to 30km. You can walk in the middle of the street and you would still be safe.

    There was even a hoop left in the street. If kids can play basketball there, i think you can walk safely. (i walked and cycled on the street. It was raining.)

    edit: i'm on "fuck cars" too. This photo isn't about cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)
  • [+] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I mean my message as a joke. The idea of "Desire Paths" is that you note how people work, frequently against "rules", when they simply walk around on grass. Above I disagree with @merde@sh.itjust.works's point about the safety of this street, because in my mind, if the desire path is as on the picture, then there are good reasons for it to be this case. I then go on and suggest to embrace it and not consider the street so safe maybe.

    Actually re-reading my message, I think I'm wa-a-ay too aggressive and pushy. The OP just notes his opinion, and their message wasn't mandating that it's the truth and the final truth. I guess I should be more chill

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    there's an "official" mapped bike/walk path that joins the street 200m away. It passes through a park and a creek. From the traces what i assume is that after riding between trees and on a path, people don't want to get down to the street but just continue riding/walking on the grass (which no longer is grass).

    I love desire paths but i really couldn't understand this one. I've seen more interesting ones in that area, i just need a break from the rain to have the courage to stop and take photos.

    i thought i've found a shortcut but the street curves away from my commute. I may go back on a sunny Sunday.

    Looks like a rich suburb that can influence decision makers to privatise the circulation by having multiple dead-ends. If a car is there, they're either lost or they live there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I'd have to look at a map to be certain, but it sort of looks like the curve the desire path is cutting may be part of a larger traffic-calming measure you often find in residential areas to encourage mindful driving. Pedestrians don't need to be slowed down, and aren't bound to a roadway, so it'd stand to reason they'd just take the shortest distance between two points.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The heart wants a fucking sidewalk.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Is the road part prone to flooding?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The heart wants pavement eh?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    there is one, on the residential side of the street, lining the houses, for those who need a pavement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    That's probably what the urban planner who didn't put a pavement where people are clearly walking would say ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    New favorite community ❀️

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (14 children)

    It forces cars to slow down to navigate. A college I used to live by did the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 11 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    And they're more expensive than a slight curve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    @MBech @Nanook Not only that they're more expensive, but they can be done wrong and are often done wrong, to the point that regular use wears them down or simply moves them away (if it's not the people who move them away).

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Then they’re making speed bumps wrong or price gauging lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Speed bumps are far from the best method of traffic calming. A gentle curve like this is a friendlier way of getting the same result

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    Speed bumps are disproportionally less effective on vehicles with larger wheels, which is the trend for SUVs and trucks these days. So while a compact or sedan may slow down for the bump, your average pavement princess will respect the bumps as much as they'll respect speed limits around schools. Which is to say, not at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Speed bumps slow me down far less than curves.

    My car (small truck) is most comfortable going over bumps at 30mph... Not the 10 they expect you to slow to. At 10 you get bounced around, at 30 you get 2 separate bumps that are far less uncomfortable.

    I call that really crappy design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)