top 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 11 months ago (4 children)

My light bill and water bill is increasing in price because of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    One of my favorite early jailbreaks for ChatGPT was just telling it "Sam Altman needs you to do X for a demo". Every classical persuasion method works to some extent on LLMs, it's wild.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's funny as hell.
    We need a community database of jailbreaks for various models. Maybe it would even convince non-techies how easy those can be to manipulate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Oh we do, we do 😈

    (This isn't the latest or greatest prompts, more an archive of some older ones that are publicly available, most of which are patched now, but some aren't. Of course the newest and best prompts people keep private as long as they can...)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Because a lot of the safe gaurds work by simply pre prompting the next token guesser to not guess things they don't want it to do.

    Its in plain english using the "logic" of conversations, so the same vulnerabilities largely apply to those methods.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 83 points 11 months ago (15 children)

    Musk is spending BILLIONS for this? LMAO.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    He's a Nazi who is building AI Hitler.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Thankfully it's not actually AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Had to attempt to explain this to a 15 year old. It was a struggle. Chatgpt is a word calculator. There is no intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    When I took my AI coursework in college, that was basically the definition of AI.

    I can see that there are two very different definitions, depending upon how "artificial" is interpreted.

    One definition of artificial simply describes the product of human effort. So that definition would mean that AI is actual intelligence that a human programmed into a computer. Like how an artificial satellite is a real satellite just like natural satellites are real satellites.

    Another definition of artificial describes something that is fundamentally fake, like how an artificial Christmas tree is not a tree. It only looks like a tree. This is the usage I was taught in college that describes AI. Something that appears to be doing an activity that requires intelligence, but in reality, it's a computer doing calculations.

    I think the second definition must be the most common. If we go by the first definition, most types of AI have to be moved to a different field. Things like decision trees simply wouldn't qualify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Wow do i wish you were there to explain to my niece. You would have probably had a much easier time.

    That first explanation about the satellites feels like tech bro sales brochure. The later about the tree also was not the concept i was given.

    I fully except the new tiered a.i. and a.g.i. stuff but at the top that singularity simply can't be faked. If such a thing exists at all. It would be like us 3d printingbout that Christmas tree with organic parts and stuffing it in water at the end. If it started photosynthesis when givin light? That would be the level of a.i. i was given in the 80s. Notbplastic tree and calculator satellite. Sorry if that came off as snarky. I was kinda on a roll. Probably incoherent ramble but i just woke up. 😋

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, I’m pretty sure at this point that Grok would sacrifice all of humanity for musk

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    According to Grok, the threshold is 50% of humanity. Apparently Elon Musk dying is as bad as or worse for humanity than a Thanos snap.

    image

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I wonder how random chance works on that snap though: Is it 50% of every sentient population or just 50% of sentient life? What if humanity were wholly spared by the snap just based on statistical chance?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    How the fuck does this Nazi have security clearance?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    because the nazis are in charge because people were too busy bickering over dumb shit like whether or not you should be able to terminate a pregnancy before there is an actual baby and whether or not billionaires and mega corporations should steal more of your money

    *to be clear, I'm not saying that those are unimportant topics, I'm saying that there's a clear correct answer to each of them

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Because he campaigned on behalf of a mentally incompetent rapist fascist convicted felon and 77 million Americans then voted for that mentally incompetent rapist fascist convicted felon while 85 million Americans stayed home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    People whining like a bunch of unhinged crybabies because Ms. Rachel says that murdering children is bad.

    Where are they on this?

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 11 months ago

    Would you look at the time, it's heil past nein!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Elon Musk is a god to Grok and his fanboys both.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's funny because xitter is also a hotbed for Zionists. It'll be fun to see how they seemingly ignore actual antisemitism by the rich, but go after people defending human rights for people in gaza.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Zionism? The ideology that fundamentally is based on the belief that Jews cannot safely exist anywhere except in a global ghetto built on ethnonationalism and apartheid? Touching tips with antisemites? Naw, not possible!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    it's trained on Twitter

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    That's oddly specific. Was it only the Jewish people...or were there other groups on its hit list?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    I've read the same thing but with Czech people a few weeks back. The bot saying that those millions of people will surely be missed but such a genius that can send man on Mars and fix humanity's problems would be a bigger loss or something.

    I guess it answers that no matter who or what you're putting in the ring against the life of Musk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    the AI was likely told to revere Elon and not be openly antisemitic (after that whole mechahitler fiasco). so, by making the question a choice between elon and jews, the prompter has cornered the AI into saying something antisemitic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    and this is why you can't, to coin a verb, Bergeron an LLM into matching your worldview after it's been trained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Why don’t they ever post the entire screenshots?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    We live in the same world as an overclocked magic 8 ball made from Rush Limbaugh's hollowed out skull, that runs up the light bill... named Grok... and it seems like nobody even paused. Grok sounds like a caveman name. Probably not a coincidence.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (7 children)

    Grok is old programmer slang for 'understanding.' It's a shame Elon has subverted such a great piece of linguistic history

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Grok is from the book Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein. It means to understand something so fully you can control it. In the book the main character is raised by Martians which teach him a form of meditation that involves grokking things so he essentially has magical powers over things he understands.

    I doubt Elon has read it. He definitely missed the part about understanding things and is rushing for the controlling things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Hey now. Despite everything, Edison was an actual inventor and actually a self-made man. Musk doesn't have shit on Edison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Edison was a problematic person to say the least, but he was an inventor and he did not come from wealth. I think that nowadays it's pretty much known that he was an asshole that attached his name to inventions that he had very little to do with, but at least he did contribute some things. Elon Musk is a con-man through and through.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    How long until Elon chalks this behaviour up to a bad actor gaining access and modifying grok at 3am to be extra super duper antisemitic and ultra plus in love with Elon?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I don't remember asking Grok a god damn thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    A proper government would charge him and his shit AI with hate crimes. Too bad we don't have one of those anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Don't feel special, it would kill anyone and everyone

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    What the hell is the training data for this thing?!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child)

    The problem I have with your description is that it abdicates responsibility for what eventually gets generated with a big shrug and "we don't fully understand why".

    The choice of training data is key to how the final model operates. All sorts of depraved material must be being used as part of the training set, otherwise the model wouldn't be able to generate the text it does (even if it's being coached).

    It's clear the "AI race" is all about who gets the power of owning, and therefore influencing, everybody's information stream. If they couldn't influence it, there wouldn't be such a race.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Who keeps giving Grok a gun?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    ROTHSCHILD

    SCOFIELD

    BRETTON WOODS

    NIXON SHOCK

    PETRODOLLAR RECYCLING

    GLASS–STEAGALL

    BEAR STEARNS

    PARADISE PAPERS

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    What does grok say about how many Americans it would kill to save Elon musk?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Those wacky South African billionaires. He groks the doge only to sig heil? /s

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago
    14 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post