Showing this was not about security at all.
post
Title leaves out "or passport."
In a push to get you to think you must have a Real ID, I've noticed the media constantly leaves out or minimizes the fact that a passport is sufficient to get you through an airport or any other place a Real ID is required.
So no extra fee of you have a passport.
I've always just considered a passport to be a Real ID™.
From the U.S. Department of State website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/passports/passports-realid.html
The U.S. passport book and passport card are both REAL ID compliant.
Both Real IDs and passports are the premium options, you pay extra to have them.
Okay good, I used my passport last time I had flown so I was worried I'd have to cough up an extra fee the next time.
TSA says the fee will cover the administrative and IT costs associated with the ID verification program and ensure the expense is covered by the travelers and not the taxpayers.
Ah, that makes sense. It costs $45 per person to do exactly what they were doing without additional cost up until now.
Ok, so there are certainly going to be some administrative and maintenance costs associated with any system, and they are currently paid for by the tax payer. For arguments sake, lets just say that cost should instead be put solely onto people who choose not to take the steps necessary to get a REAL ID, ignoring the many legitimate reasons someone may not wish to or be able to do that.
The follow up question then, is how much does the fee need to be to offset that cost? Well, it will need to be based on the number of those who will not get a REAL ID even after the fee introduction, so it will likely be lower than it is now given the fee as a motivation. Currently 44% of issued id's in the US are without REAL ID status. Let's say that the vast majority of those people are motivated by this fee or other factors to finally get a REAL ID in the next year or two. Let's say a bit over 75% of those currently without it are motivated to get one now (a major over estimation, surely). So only 10% of all US citizens with state issued ids wouldn't have REAL ID.
Given an average of 2.9 million Americans fly every single day, that's 290,000 non REAL ID flyers a day. Times $45, that's $13 million per day, or $4.745 billion per year... to do administration and maintenance on an existing system.
If that is the true cost, that means that 40% of their current congressionally allocated budget of $11.3 billion is spent on maintaining this one system alone. That is simply absurd and anyone with half a lick of sense should know that. So either they are expecting well more than 90% of people to get a REAL ID soon or they are just massively overcharging people and pocketing the difference.
It doesn't cost a tenth of that to do anything they're allegedly doing now or have done ever. Fuck TSA sideways with a Midwestern wool sock after a week layover in Tulsa. 🤌🏼
To be fair, in CA it costs exactly $45 to get a renewal REAL ID drivers license. That is paid by the traveler, not the taxpayer. The difference is that is a one-time fee to get a card that works for either 5 or 10 years, versus a fee every time you fly.
It's hard to feel bad for this considering that "Replace your ID with Real ID has been posted in the airport for... 10 years? More? How long does it take to save $20 and get it or pivot to passport? Getting Real ID doesn't cost $45 in the first place.
We still need to go through the process to make sure that we verify who you are
As long as I don't have any weapons it shouldn't matter.
but how else will we track where everyone is all the time
Unless you are using a fake ID and fake credit card then they already have that data?
They know John Smith who lives at 123 Main Street in Bumbfuck, WI and who paid with credit card 1234567890123456 is flying from MSN to LAX on December 1st, 2025 and returning via the same route on December 3rd, 2025.
The RealID requirements are to, theoretically, streamline the process of matching person to face with more standardized ID requirements. Like all ID related legislature there is good and bad there.
But if your focus is on The Man tracking you? This changes nothing unless you are already actively committing fraud at MANY levels.
neat. there is no reason they even need an id. do you need one to gain access to the highways?
Most highways are publicly accessible (and still log you with a Flock(TM) camera anyway...). But if you want to use the priority lane in states like Colorado? Yeah, they need to scan your pass and they very much do.
The ID still matches the face/body to the Person. Its no different than checking if you are the person with a reservation at a hotel. That said, you can bet there is work in place to not actually need it through a mix of facial ID and profiling.
that’s my point. outside of a thin lane or three, which is probably considerable “private” - public infra should be accessible. Last I checked (abt six months ago) I did not need to show ID to hop on the brewster line into grand central.
it’s all just a cash grab and control theater / normalization at airports. there is nothing special about flying compared to trains, except of course: profit.
I did not need to show ID to hop on the brewster line into grand central.
Because those are public roads. Not high priority roads you pay for access to. Just like fully government funded buses and the like don't care if you have a ticket or not. Whereas those that are only subsidized tend to still require a pass/ticket/payment.
Also I'll just point out: Your car has a license plate. It is trivial to read those with an overhead camera. And, depending on the road/day, you can bet a cop will gladly run you down if they spot you have no license plate or decide they care about the polarized screen you put on top of it. At which point you can bet they'll want to see your ID and won't take "I am a sovereign citizen and this is a public road" as an answer.
there is nothing special about flying compared to trains
And you need to tie your body to your ticket when you get on a train. We tend to not care anywhere near as much about security with trains (because everyone knows bombs and box cutters only work if you are at least 100 feet above the ground!), but you can be damned sure the ticket machine where you inserted your cash took a picture of your face to go with it.
I genuinely don't care about what kind of libertarian nonsense you are on about hating the concept of IDs at all. My point was simply that if you think the RealID requirement has ANY bearing on The Man knowing where you are and where you are going then... you don't actually understand what your exposure is.
And the VIP lane on the highway is a private road?
Whats next, HOV Lane brought to you by Carl's Jr.?
Stop normalizing the surveillance state. It's not a good look.
I mean... HOV lanes very often take photos at certain points to see if you have multiple passengers. And often those ARE the ones where individuals/duos can pay for access.
It isn't "normalizing" to acknowledge what reality is. If it makes you feel better? Ignore the surveillance tech that is already there. But don't get pissy if others don't live in the same blissful ignorance.
It isn't "normalizing" to acknowledge what reality is
Ahh, but what if reality isn't normal?
Name another point in human history where our identities, our habits, our routine, our very movement within our states borders...was a fucking commodity, with chunks owned by the government and curated by the richest people in the world.
I'll wait.
And don't say the slave trade because that's just admitting that we aren't free people.
i should have clarified: “access” meant physical meatspace access not allowance.
I suspect this is what the payment requirement is really about. Like, yes they're getting money, but they're also getting a credit card transaction at the gate at the date and time of travel.
It's always possible that someone else purchased your travel ticket for you (for instance I sometimes travel for work which my employer's travel agency books for me). But if you have to pay at the moment when your ID would be checked, presumably that has to be your personal card that you have on you in the moment.
My understanding is that most airlines will still allow you to pay, in cash, at the customer service desk in the baggage area the day of. But they still require ID and you can be DAMNED sure that about forty different flags went off in a database if you do that.
But yeah. Credit cards are immensely useful. They also go a LONG way towards providing very trackable behaviors for people.
A meme of jd vance is the most dangerous weapon of all
It would only make sense if it was a one time fee, and you got your ID as a result.
We also know it’s not about security, or you couldn’t fly without one.
We know it’s a cash grab because they’re counting on a “built-in” amount of flyers who won’t have or will refuse to get ID with privacy issues. If, by some anomaly, more or all flyers acquire the ID, then we’d see maintenance fees added and the fee itself increased to maintain revenue certainty - but who are we kidding, those things will eventually happen anyways.
I was under the impression real id was required to fly. This article is the first hint I've seen that it's not. I wonder if that changed recently?
Or passport. I fly fairly regularly for work and don't have a "REAL ID" star on my license
Don't you have to renew like once every 10 years? Real ID has been a thing for awhile, can you even renew without getting it?
I think I have three years until it expires, so at that point I'll have to get it. Not worried about it until then
My guess is the intent was always revenue…not security. Security was just the pretext for new revenue, because margins are thin and there’s a certain proportion of people who will pay to prioritize privacy.
I’ve barely kept track of it, but I think it kept getting knocked down by courts?
I paid for a real id license when they were first available in my state, and I’ve paid for a renewal. I disagree with the surveillance society they enable but I’m also a realist who wants to travel conveniently.
But I’ve still never gotten one. When it comes down to it, actually getting a real id license requires taking a day off work and waiting in line at the Registry …… whereas I can renew a standard license online and have a few years left on my passport
One of the many ways RealID has been a fiasco is RMV/DMV’s not staffing up to support it
I'm in a backass hillbilly state but I just made an appointment at the DMV and then had to wait all of 5 minutes when I got there. But, then they tried to argue every single piece of paper I brought which involved calls to supervisors so it wound up being a 40 minute ordeal. I swear they don't want you to actually get it.
when I was like "hey can I do my REAL ID real quick now too?" to the DMV agent I was renewing my registration with, he literally laughed at me 🤣. It's like 90% the effort of getting a full-blown passport, at least with the documentation they make you give in my state...
A passport is a really good thing to have, and lasts much longer than a Real ID state license. It ends up costing like $13/yr and it opens up the whole world to you. It blows my mind that on;y 50% of US citizens ever bother getting one.
Many citizens don't leave their state. Plenty of them are hand to mouth and can't afford groceries. Even local travel is a luxury to some, so I can understand why they might not have the desire to go through the process and pay for the passport, not to mention that many people don't know their SSN or have their birth certificates.
I looked it up, my understanding is US passports are currently issued with your "assigned sex at birth", i.e. not your gender or biological sex.
Basically, the passport isn't showing your gender.
No, it's showing what's in my pants. Or was in my pants at birth if I've had an operation. And if my gender presentation doesn't match someone's expectations, it means I will potentially get detained or harassed. Or possibly even arrested depending on the country.
So the intent is to hurt the trans community. And being all, 'well actually' about it being sex assigned at birth feels like a bad faith take.
Which is why you're getting downvoted.
It's weird to live in a world where sex assigned at birth and gender are two vastly different things.
Gender is sociology. Essentially caste and class roles.
Sex is biology.
Folks that like to conflate the two want gender roles to be immutable.
I don't think so. I think if someone wants to change their gender that's their business. It's not something I'd want to do but calling it weird seems kind of judgy.
Oh for sure, I'm not saying foreign travel or passport fees are an achievable goal for every single adult American. But we are talking here about the group of people who fly at the very least domestically. And for that, you need Real ID, which does require you to supply things like your SSN and birth certificate. So for that group specifically that we're talking about here, the domestic flyers that already need or have Real ID, I think a passport is a logical thing to get as well if it's in your budget.
Well over half of us live paycheck to paycheck and traveling is exorbitantly expensive. Especially international travel.
It sucks being broke.
Ding ding ding- the commenter your replying to must not be poor to think buying something you cannot use is a good idea 😂😭
Travel can be done cheap. Don't go to the exorbitantly expensive shitty fake ass resort where you get food poisoning.
Go be real, in the real world.
Man, some of us are annoyed every time we have to drive into town to shop for groceries or go to work. I'm surrounded by nature at home. I don't want to travel. You'd have to B. A. Baracas me to get me on an airplane or boat. I neither need nor want a passport.
hahaha now there's something I haven't thought about in a minute. I honestly hate airports, airplanes, the TSA, and flying myself. But I do love seeing places and people and experiencing things that I never would have otherwise, whether that's in my home town, across the state, or across the world, count me in :)
It costs thousands of dollars to travel to another country from the US.
For some people in some cases, sure. Myself, I traveled in South America for 3 months last year and overall I saved money vs. expenses in the US, even with airfare included. Also, there's probably 100 million Americans that live within a single tank of gas of getting to Mexico or Canada. There are plenty of lower-income Americans, Brits, Aussies, and Germans (to name the big groups) who manage to travel extensively for long periods at very low expense. I've met many of them, and they could make "thousands of dollars" (let's say you're talking about $3,000) last a good three months in many parts of the world. Look for deals, be willing to not get exactly what you want, and be patient, and travel can be (and had been for me) cheaper overall than paying US prices for housing food etc.
What about if you live in the real world? If I fell asleep for three months I'd wake up ten grand poorer. It's great that you can completely uproot yourself for three months and then comeback and restart life and somehow save money, but that is so incredibly unrealistic. My bills don't stop because I took a cheap trip to Brazil.
Yeah it's a different lifestyle and not appealing or possible for everyone in every situation of course (not that I implied it was but for some reason I feel the need to defend my self on that point). I get that the systems we all live under have many of us completely captured by debt or bills and impoverished to the point where the major concerns in life are getting enough to eat each day and not freezing to death homeless out on the street. It's conditions like that elsewhere in the world which cause people to emigrate in search of a better life in the USA, ironically.
Just did a quick search and just to fly to all the european countries and asia I tried were over $1000. South America was $500+. Also, most of us still have to pay rent while we're traveling, we own shit we can't just abandon so it's literally impossible for it to be cheaper to travel and what do you do when you come back to no job?
There are other methods than direct flights
Not sure how I'm supposed to get anywhere besides mexico/canada without flying.
My real ID is 8 years versus my passport's 10. And cheaper, less hassle to renew, and more convenient to carry. But I do have both.
My state also hasn't offered non-real IDs in several years.
It costs 165 bucks per person or almost $700 for a family of 4. Then they need $3000-$5000 to travel round trip once to a destination in Europe.
Why is europe the only place you're considering travel to? It's a big world out there
As a passport holder myself, that was my plan. This article has me wondering if we'd still be charged the fee. TSA is notoriously stupidly incompetent, and I wouldn't put it past this system to be giving kickbacks to agents.
idk, not by the letter of the law, no. But they are they are pretty awful sometimes. I personally always used my passport for all flights even before REAL ID existed, it's just easier for them than offering a license from a rural state like I live in that they may see once or twice a day.
Is it that uncommon to have a passport in the US? That's basically part of the common ID paper you'd have here.
Yes. We can travel over 3000 miles and still be in the same country with about every climate. Meanwhile for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports and involve waiting weeks. Then flying say Seattle to Paris for instance would cost about $3000 before actually doing anything there. This is in addition to the $300-$400 spent every 5-7 years on normal identity documents that you need for other purposes. This cost varies substantially state to state.
Meanwhile families here are facing drastically escalating costs especially housing and medical.
Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.
Americans have both increased dis-incentives and less incentives to travel internationally compared to Europeans.
I mean EU citizens can also travel similar distances in the schengen zone without a passport and just an ID card.
for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports
You lost me there for a moment. In France, a biometric passport costs 86 € ($100) for 18+ people, 42 € ($49) for kids between 15-17, and 17 € (~$20) for people younger than 15. It lasts 10 years for adults, and if you renew your national ID card and passport at the same time, you only pay for one (ID card alone is 25 €, ~$29).
$700 for a family of 4 sounds insane. But if there's no incentive, I guess I get it. I basically kept using my passport for a few decades instead of having an ID card, so it feels more natural to me.
Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.
We don't need a passport to go to most other European countries, fortunately.
I never got one because my license expired during covid and i didn't have a recent bill/bank statement (and I had no intention of walking into a DMV at that time) fortunately i do have a passport that i plan to renew as soon as it expires, but my passport is supposed to be for international travel, not domestic.
it wasn't that long ago that you only needed a birth certificate to travel to the caribbean or a border country. this is getting out of hand.
Same, I've been renewing online for the past 12 years. This year I had to go in and they gave me a hard time over my points. Apparently you can't have more than one letter from the same government agency. I had 2 from the DMV and was like, "This is literally you guys! Two separate forms. Two separate dates! You don't trust yourselves enough to get it right more than once!? Like, trust me dude, nobody's going to the DMV pretending to be me. No sane person would put themselves through that torture just to steal my identity... Nobody wants to be me, it doesn't come with a whole lot of perks."
Thankfully, I just had my passport renewed, so I said screw it and got my regular one.
but my passport is supposed to be for international travel, not domestic.
You can get a passport card so that you don't need to carry around the book
Do you have a recent W2 or tax return with your current address on it? That + valid passport is good in my state.
I use my passport for domestic travel almost always. I come from a small state so it's just easier than showing the TSA agent a type of license they see maybe a couple of a day and don't know how to read. Never had an issue.
The agency warns that even then, there is no guarantee that individuals will be cleared to cross through the security checkpoint.
Bummer, that’s another $45 to re-check until they get it right. I’m guessing this will happen a lot.
I mean that's obvious. Otherwise you're just paying $45 to ignore the security checkpoint if you're guaranteed to get through with payment.
It's far from obvious these days that the US wouldn't apply a mandatory straight-up bribe to its government services. It'd just be a smaller-scale version of Trump's "gold card" visa.
Oh no, guess I’ll have to not fly even harder 🤷♂️
Makes me wonder why they don’t want people flying. All these different things being done to make it harder for the average person to fly. I suppose it could just be incompetence, but it really feels like there’s intent behind it.
top 100 comments