No budget for now, and I own the SSDs already I just want to know what's out there and what other people like.

My current setup is cobbled together from random parts and the HDDs are loud in my bedroom. I want all SSD storage (at least 4x) but with enough CPU/Ram to handle a lot of apps/VMs and some above-average demanding tasks (jellyfin, syncthing) than just being a NAS.

The only other criteria is that I would prefer it to be as small as possible (not rack mount).

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 11 months ago* (7 children)

Assume an unlimited budget for now, I just want to know what's out there.

I mean, if you're willing to pay the price of a car per SSD they go up to at least 122TB density per drive... (e.g. Solidigm SBFPF2BV0P12001 D5-P5336 -- $16K~$20K depending on supplier from a quick search)

I don't actually recommend that for personal use, but since you were curious about what's out there, there's some absolutely crazy shit in enterprise server gear if you have deep enough pockets.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    For that kind of money, I would expect the SSD drive to be able to provide some other qualities beyond technical things like capacity/bandwidth/latency.

    Some very good qualities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Those are awesome lol what would be a good system to run them in?

    EDIT: I feel I need to say I'm not actually going to pay for that, 4x4tb is probably plenty but it's still awesome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    It looks like the connector is U.2 so I'd look for motherboards that indicate support for that explicitly. From a quick search, it looks like SuperMicro makes some. This is getting out of my area of expertise though; I just know the crazy drives exist...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    You're requirements are too vague as "lots of apps/VMs" doesn't describe the expected load. Overall though if you want small just build a mini-ITX system. Then you can put in any x86 chip that fits your needs.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Ok, so if you want to do a bunch of drives in a box:

    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/FhPzK8/gigabyte-mw50-sv0-atx-lga2011-3-motherboard-mw50-sv0

    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/yFWJ7P/crucial-bx500-4-tb-25-solid-state-drive-ct4000bx500ssd1

    However, that's expensive. I would go with spinning disks.

    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/9wVmP6/western-digital-wd-blue-4-tb-35-5400rpm-internal-hard-drive-wd40ezaz

    If you want to bring the cost down more,

    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/4bqPxr/asus-prime-b550-plus-ac-hes-atx-am4-motherboard-prime-b550-plus-ac-hes

    https://ebay.us/m/kmgfao

    You can drive the price down more by buying a used system.

    The pile of SSDs will be easiest to stuff into a box.

    You will need to get creative with cooling.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Thank you that's probably too big for my tastes but I appreciate the insight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    The last board suggested with 5 ports would handle 4 drives in raidz2.

    This is smaller even. https://pcpartpicker.com/product/hRBrxr/asrock-motherboard-970mpro3

    I would prefer having the smaller board with the hba and putting 8-10 smaller drives in raidz3. That would give you 6 TB with three drives for failure to prevent loss.

    Outside the drives, the cost would be under $200 for the board and the hba.

    If you have an old system with two PCI-e 16 ports, then your cost is about $90 before you start buying drives.

    I'm doing similar with a DDR3 system and spinning 1 TB disks. It's fast enough to serve video streams.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    enough, a lot, more demanding.

    You need to give some sort of guidance here.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If I/O speed is important the challenge will be getting lots of nvme slots in a small form factor. Many atx motherboards have bifurcated pci-e slots that can be converted to manage 2 nvme drives at once (in addition to on-board nvme slots) but I don’t know if matx boards do that, so if you wanted 3+ drives that would be the first thing to consider. If you just want a bunch of sata ssds there are more options, but all considerably slower.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    NAS only, or storage and workload?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago

    "Home Server" more than "NAS" so I guess, your typical docker apps, but no LLMs or anything. I would like at least 4 hard drives, preferably m.2 but SATA is fine too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    https://www.bee-link.com/products/beelink-me-mini-n150

    I have no experience with this. Just sharing so you have more ideas to think about

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If you're looking for more compact than powerful asustor has this https://www.asustor.com/en/product?p_id=91 12 nvme sticks with 8tb per stick would give you 96tb of storage in that small form factor. Only problem might be how much power you'd get out of that processor but you can bump the ram up to I think it was 96 gigs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    I'm personally using https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product%2Fproduct&product_id=294, sounds like what you're looking for. It's got four m.2 slots, up to 16gb ram, the rockchip soc should be sufficiently powerful for anything that's not crazy demanding.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    If the big consideration is really sound, doing whatever is necessary to use larger, but slower (wide, high CFM per dB/RPM) and higher quality (fluid dynamic bearings) fans might serve the purpose regardless of other hardware. Some of them are rated to be <20dB, quieter than a whisper, and fluid bearings are supposed to be mostly impervious to the noise added by aging that hits a lot of fans.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (2 children)

    A high-cpu small machine will have noisy fans, there's no avoiding that. The fans have to be of small diameter so they will spin at high RPM. Maybe you can say what you're actually trying to run, and make things easier for us.

    I gave up on this approach a long time ago and it's been liberating. My main personal computer is a laptop and for a while I had a Raspberry Pi 400 running some server-like things. The Raspberry is currently not in use though maybe I'll get it going again sometime. All my bigger computational stuff is remote. So the software is self-hosted but not the hardware. IDK if that counts as self-hosting around here. But it's much more reliable that way, with the boxes in multiple countries for geo separation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments