'Ai girls never say no' is pretty awful

This is pretty gross and not at all surprising.

Social media and Big Tech, in general, has been really awful for privacy. This is just disgusting.

Should be fined $1000 for each image or identifiable piece information of a human being.

This shit is creepy and anyone involved should be ashamed.

On its site, Secret Desires says it uses end-to-end encryption to secure communications from users: “All your communications—including messages, voice calls, and image exchanges—are encrypted both at rest and in transit using industry-leading encryption standards. This ensures that only you have access to your conversations.” It also says stores data securely: “Your data is securely stored on protected servers with stringent access controls. We employ advanced security protocols to safeguard your information against unauthorized access.”

Earlier this year, as part of its paid subscriptions that range from $7.99 to $19.99 a month, it had a “face swapping” feature that let users upload images of real people to put them in sexually explicit AI generated images and videos.
...
In early 2025, Secret Desires removed its face-swapping feature. The most recent date in the faceswap files is April 2025.
...
“I can look like your favorite celebrity. That girl from the gym. Your dream anime character or anyone else you fantasize about? I can do everything for you.” Most of Secret Desires’ ads on YouTube are about giving up on real-life connections and dating apps in favor of getting an AI girlfriend.

They straight up marketed the ability to make deepfakes.

That slogan in the preview image (“AI Girls Never say no”) is creepy enough on its own, but even more when users are having it imitate real people

This is the reason impersonation / defamation laws exist. Have at it ladies.

If a normal person was to infringe copyright then that person could be sued and even face jail time.

But, a company run AI steals all the data on the net and turns school kids into digital sex workers that is fine apparently.

Anyone got past the paywall to establish whether its women being victimized with the random-ass pics mentioned in the first couple paragraphs, or young girls(minors) being victimized with yearbook photos, as the title implies?

I feel like an opportuinity was missed, in favor of leaving things vague and click-baitey in the name of profit/data-mining.