all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 11 months ago

Not for long.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I hope they keep the pope away from any antipopes lest we have a catastrophic explosion in Rome.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    Statistically speaking there is more than 1 skeleton inside everybody.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Statistically, a human has fewer than two arms, two legs, or two eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    ...and more than two nipples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The average human has one boob

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    If you ignore man-boobs, sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Is there really more people missing limbs than with child?

    I'm confident enough to say a living human at least more than one head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    I mean I guess you could include fetuses, but they aren’t actually part of the mother’s body, and would already count on their own, so while “skeletons inside” is a truthful statistic to include fetuses for, they don’t add limbs so counting them seems dishonest for this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    For a while it was four, but then Nazi Spanish Inquisition pope died.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago*

    The big one ate the smaller one.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    I couldn't get my head around that stat, thinking that on average it was the current pope and the next pope (who doesn't know it yet) in the Vatican; or whether it counted the remains of popes gone by.

    Then I saw the metric area of the Vatican and it made a bit more sense... but not by much.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    The highest pope density in the entire universe.

    Unless you acknowledge the space pope, obviously.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Statistically, there are a million me per square km in the square meter around me.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Whenever someone says, "Statistically....", you know they're about to say some dumb shit that is an ignorant misinterpretation of statistics.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    does that include antipopes, and do those count as -1? also do popes and antipopes annihilate when they kiss?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Wow, that's even higher papal density than Luxembourg!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Actually the typically recognized person as the pope is not in the Vatican city. Which means the number of pope's in Vatican city is 0. https://youtu.be/RMf4OtC7SXY

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Always 2 too many.

    -- a Roman

  • source