
post
If you want a technical breakdown that isn't "lol AI bad":
https://blog.cloudflare.com/18-november-2025-outage/
Basically, a permission change cause an automated query to return more data than was planned for. The query resulted in a configuration file with a large amount of duplicate entries which was pushed to production. The size of the file went over the prealloctaed memory limit for a downstream system which died due to an unhandled error state resulting from the large configuration file. This caused a thread panic leading to the 5xx errors.
It seems that Crowdstrike isn't alone this year in the 'A bad config file nearly kills the Internet' club.
‘A bad config file nearly kills the Internet’ club
There's no such thing as bad data, only shitty code to create it or ingest it, and bad testing that failed to detect the shitty code. The overflow of the magic config-file size threw an exception, and there was no handler for that? Jeez Louise.
And as for unhandled exceptions, you'd think static analysis would have detected that.
So the actual outage comes down to pre-allocating memory, but not actually having error handling to gracefully fail if that limit is or will be exceeded... Bad day for whoever shows up on the git blame for that function
This is the wrong take. Git blame only show who wrote the line. What about the people who reviewed the code?
Plus the guys who are hired to ensure that systems don't fail even under inexperienced or malicious employees, management who designs and enforces the whole system, etc... "one guy fucked up and needs to be fired" is just a toxic mentality that doesn't actually address the chain of conditions that led to the situation
If you have reasonable practices, git blame will show you the original ticket, a link to the code review, and relevant information about the change.
Shitty code has been around far longer than AI. I should know, I wrote plenty of it.
They trained it on the work of people like you.
Shame on them. I mark my career by how long it takes me to regret the code I write. When I was a junior, it was often just a month or two. As I seasoned it became maybe as long as two years. Until finally i don't regret my code, only the exigencies that prevented me from writing better.
I too have looked at my earliest repos in dispair
It's always depressing when you ask the AI to explain your code and then you get banned from OpenAI
Who didn't get hit by the fork bug the professor explicitly asked you to watch out for since it would (back then with windows systems being required to use the campus resources) require an admin with Linux access to eliminate.
It was kind of fun walking in to the tech support area and them asking your login name with no context knowing what the issue was. Must have been a common occurrence that week of the course.
But, AI can do the work of 10 of you humans, so it can write 10 times the bugs and deploy them to production 10 times faster. Especially if pesky testers stay out the way instead of finding some of the bugs.
Indirectly, this was. He said this was a bug in their recent tool that allows sites to block AI crawlers that caused the outages. It’s a relatively new tool released in the last few months, so it makes sense it might be buggy as the rush to stop the AI DoS attacks has been pertinent.
Humans are plenty capable of writing crappy code without needing to blame AI.
Blame it on the massive tech sector layoffs
Evidence or speculation?
Obviousness? If you mass layoff your tech staff, you take the risk of more technical failures.
A smaller staff cannot do the same work as a larger one, and I guarantee you they're being asked to progress at the same speed. So, the tradeoff is on the quality of the product and the testing, not on the speed of development.
If your website or service was disrupted by the Cloudflare outage, then you only have yourself to blame.
The Crowdstrike incident from last year was a wakeup call to abandon centralized services like Cloudflare. If you missed that lesson, then it is on you.
Did they though? Aside from the "every outage is a latent bug" angle, from their postmortem it doesn't seem to me like they tried to blame it on anything but their failure to contain the spread of (and timely diagnose) the issue
Why's he saying it's not an attack? Sounds like he's protesting too much.
It's not the first time Cloudflare has shot themselves in the foot.
There's nothing to be gained from Cloudflare lying about this. It honestly makes them look worse if the outage was caused internally vs if it had been due to an attack
all 43 comments