88
Firefox 139 hides homescreen option to disable ads (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/firefox@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

After I noticed Firefox has removed the Pocket branding but kept the Pocket stories, I also noticed the settings screen on the homepage no longer lets you disable sponsored stories or links.

Firefox 115:

Firefox 139:

You can still remove these advertisements, but you have to leave the homepage and dig through the settings to find that option.

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 year ago (1 child)

You use the firefox homepage? Pfft.

Blank Page gang where you at

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    U should really switch to a firefox fork. The official version is fucked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Is it really fucked? Like, it works great IMO... What's wrong with it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Which one do you recommend and why?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Librewolf and Waterfox are good.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Librewolf is the best IMO. If u want persistent logins u gotta go change the sheetings not to wipe everything tho.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Note that for me Librewolf breaks several sites, sadly

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (1 reply)
    • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I'm enjoying Zen, really gets out of your way nicely. Does a bunch of things I used to hack in userChrome.css better, still reasonably secure as best I can tell, it's not librewolf but it's still firefox so I add back the normal privacy add-ons, about:settings etc, but the UX uplift is worth it.

    That said, without the firefox base we're all fucked, so this, and their general culture, is really quite disturbing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    What are you going to do when the paid Firefox dev team stops developing it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Donate to the hopefully less greed driven and user data hungry people that will take up the development.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't think you understand, the majority of the heavy lifting browser development is done by the paid devs at Mozilla. If they stop updating the browser none of the down stream forks are going to be able to replace the work they're doing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Why wouldnt they? The majority of money at Mozilla has been going to worthless management people and side projects nobody wants. Only a tiny fraction of the money Mozilla spends would be required to pay the devs that actually develop Firefox. Im saying Firefox needs to be hard forked and Mozilla can go to shit for all i care. As long as Mozilla exists, nobody will do it so maybe its even necessary for Mozilla to die.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Would you have a source that details how Mozilla spends money on the software development of Firefox vs other projects? I couldn't find it in the financial report, so I guess you have another source.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    But how much of their resources did that represent? 1%, 10%, 50%? This being a problem really depends on that number.
    They are trying to find ways to earn money independent of Google royalties so they can keep making massive FOSS projects, that compete with FAANG technology, independently. For me all the community troubles and failed projects mostly show how hard this is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    No, i made it the fuck up. But if you look at how many actual code changes happen on each release and then substract all the shit that nobody wants, there is little left. Firefox is basically in maintainance mode the way i see it. If you then look at all the other stuff mozilla is doing (ad tech, AI garbage, useless cloud features, marketing) you get a picture of where the management is placing priority. Things that lead to monetization. There are a few cool things like Thunderbird and Mozilla Location Service, but the latter has already been killed off sadly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Mozilla Corporation, who gets more than 80% of its funds from Google, around $500 millions, who does that to ensure Google search remains the default and to avoid antitrust issue if Chrome because even more dominant.
    Firefox forks will likely not be able to secure such funding and pay the engineers required to further develop a web browser fully independent of Chromium.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I dont get it. Your screenshots show an option to remove stories. What's the issue here?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not possible to hide sponsored stories or sponsored shortcuts

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •