[–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

The memo...recommended use of other messaging apps, including Microsoft Corp’s Teams platform, Amazon.com’s Wickr, Signal, Apple’s iMessage, and Facetime.

lol

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The entire set is then encrypted again in transit.

    Citation? The author of the article provides theirs, and a cursory glance at the chart that telegram themselves provides reveals that the authentication key is not encrypted at all.

    Here's the part of the article you may have missed that clarifies why that's actually a huge issue:

    This enables anyone who has sufficient network visibility and a bit of dedication to identify traffic originating from a given user device.

    IStories found evidence that all network communication to and from Telegram’s infrastructure go through a company linked to the Russian FSB. This would provide the kind of network visibility that combined with auth_key_id would allow it to identify traffic coming from specific users, globally.

    Why exactly did Telegram create a proprietary messaging protocol that uses this "surprising and unnecessary protocol design choice, present neither in Signal nor WhatsApp"?

    Maybe it was just a huge coincidence, compounded by other huge coincidences. You tell me. You have the opportunity to blow this article wide open.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    The fact is that the FSB is only a threat to those with Russian citizenship or who live within the Russian Federation

    Two things:

    1. Your focus on FSB this, FSB that is based on your refusal to read past the title
    2. Maybe you missed it, but Russia is engaged in a war of aggression against Ukraine (a country where people use Telegram). Not only is this a good reason for Ukrainians to not use it, but the post makes a compelling case that nobody should (see: network effect).

    There are reasons for Westerners not to use Telegram.

    And if you read the blog, you'd have seen them.

    It's hard not to be condescending when you proudly wallow in self-induced ignorance.

    Telegram's dangers extend not just as far as Russia's sphere of influence, but also the spheres of influence of every country that has secretly been collecting data with their express assistance. We discovered recently that Pavel Durov was hiding this fact for a long while...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Assuming everybody in this community is an nth-generation American citizen, maybe the FSB itself doesn't endanger you. But this blog post was not written with only you in mind.

    I would encourage you to read more than the title of a blog post before you critique it. At least skim around. 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is my client broken, or is the text just not visible after you cross posted? Here's the text from OP:

    Meta: Coming after your data harder than ever

    At this point it not about passive collection, corporations are going to extreme ends to get our data.

    https://www.zeropartydata.es/p/localhost-tracking-explained-it-could

    I am interested in what people are doing to enforce their privacy while using the web.

    I have some things in place, looking to compare with the community.

    (btw, I am new here, this is my first post. So uh… Hi )

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It cannot be understated how absolutely deranged the orb has been from the beginning. Sam Altman is creating the problem (AI botspam) and promising he has the solution (this ungodly trash) at the same time.

    Scam altman even sent a crew to Kenya to try coloniz... Uh, debankin... Oh, scanning eyeballs in exchange for a few piddly dollars. In response, Kenya booted his project out.

    So he turned his sights to a country he apparently can exploit: the USA.

  • source
  •  

    cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/32339919

    The Nectar project offers 'advanced data analysis' using a wide range of sensitive personal information

    A controversial US spy tech firm has landed a contract with UK police to develop a surveillance network that will incorporate data about citizens’ political opinions, philosophical beliefs, health records and other sensitive personal information.

    Documents obtained by i and Liberty Investigates show Palantir Technologies has partnered with police forces in the East of England to establish a “real-time data-sharing network” that includes the personal details of vulnerable victims, children and witnesses alongside suspects.

    Trade union membership, sexual orientation and race are among the other types of personal information being processed.

    The project has sparked alarm from campaigners who fear it will trample over Britons’ human rights and “facilitate dystopian predictive policing” and indiscriminate mass surveillance.

    Numerous police forces have previously refused to confirm or deny their links with Palantir, citing risks to law enforcement and national security. However, forces in Bedfordshire and Leicestershire have recently confirmed working with the firm.

    Liberty Investigates and i have learned that those projects involve processing data from more than a dozen UK police forces and will serve as a pilot for a potential national rollout of the tech giant’s data mining technology — which has reportedly been used by police forces in the US to predict future crimes.

     

    I have an aging (2 years old now) flagship smartphone and basically want a camera that's as decent as the one I already have, but without Google servers getting pinged every time I'm traveling and want to remember where I am - apparently my phone GPS isn't enough, Google Play Services insist they must get involved.

    Some ideal requirements would include:

    • ~3x zoom
    • Solid macro photography
    • Optical image stabilization
    • Functional in low light
    • A sensor at least the same size as my phone's (1/1.3")
    • Small enough to fit in some pocket
    • GPS tagging
    • A sub-$800 price tag?

    I understand this is a huge ask, and that modern cell phones have a pocket dimension that somehow fits this hardware inside of them, but I figured I may as well check.

    view more: next ›