all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 year ago

Speaking of which:

https://archive.is/5QFkF

Here's the article without signing up or whatever I would have to do to read it.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Unmask? For what

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The subpoena, which was posted on X by archive.today on October 30, was sent by the FBI to Tucows, a popular Canadian domain registrar. It demands that Tucows give the FBI the “customer or subscriber name, address of service, and billing address” and other information about the “customer behind archive.today.”

    “THE INFORMATION SOUGHT THROUGH THIS SUBPOENA RELATES TO A FEDERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE FBI,” the subpoena says. “YOUR COMPANY IS REQUIRED TO FURNISH THIS INFORMATION. YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE OF THIS SUBPOENA INDEFINITELY AS ANY SUCH DISCLOSURE COULD INTERFERE WITH AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW.”

    Gotta love how the FBI is stupid enough to think that it has jurisdiction over a Canadian company

  • source
  • 107 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    5 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    1 comment in c/404media@ibbit.at view that post