all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 1 year ago

Guess pirating for personal use is on the table now, boys!

  • source
  • [–] 146 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So Meta says pirating is not theft if it‘s for personal use, huh? Good to know.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    I thought that was weird, too, but that's not what they're arguing actually. Their argument is that these were pirated for personal use by various people on the company network over a course of years and that the IP address is not sufficient to identify the appropriate defendant (not Meta). Accordingly, they argue the case should be dropped because tje pleading does not, and cannot from what has been provided, identify a correct defendant. At first blush, it isn't an unreasonable argument. It would be like suing a university for detecting porn torrents on its network over a number of years (and alleging that the relatively small number of torrents were for AI research/training data).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Does this even make any difference outside of Switzerland (were pirating for personal use is actually legal)?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Like that justifies it...

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Why the ai slop? It's not really needed for anything. You wasted a gallon of water for that?

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Wow, I didn't realize Anal Butt Pirates had 2000+ volumes. I've fallen behind, no pun in ten did.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media, which are known for popular adult brands including Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, and Deeper, filed a copyright infringement complaint at a California federal court. The companies allege that Meta downloaded at least 2,396 of their films since 2018, allegedly to aid their AI video training.

    “[T]he small number of downloads—roughly 22 per year on average across dozens of Meta IP addresses—is plainly indicative of private personal use, not a concerted effort to collect the massive datasets Plaintiffs allege are necessary for effective AI training,” Meta writes

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 16 comments in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 68 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Does that make it legal? Cool.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I have ThinkPad at work which is pleasant enough to touch due to rubberised plastic but wanking with it sounds tricky because of how stiff it’s hinges are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Doesn't it have the ThinkPad rubber nipple(TM)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    They're not saying they did it for Meta's own personal use. They're arguing a bunch of private individuals did for their own personal use and they just happened to be using Meta's network, which, given that this is about 157 downloads, it honestly makes sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    Pirating for personal satisfaction is legal ?

    Well blimey !

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    “It was for our team-building circle jerk”

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    For Meta employees to jack off? That's a nice benefit system!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Me, an intellectual: same.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/legalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Isn't the excuse why they could torret these was for "training" and they weren't for personal use?

    So saying it was for personal use, means someone used company infrastructure to violate copyright law, and now the company is liable?

    Like how schools crack down on it because if it's on their network they say they could be liable?

    We need an actual government again, right now the wealthy just randomly say shit and even if they do pay, it's an insignificant fine.

    I think the big liability they're trying to avoid, is they used porn to train the AI how to make deep fake porn. And if that gets acknowledged, then people can say the AI was intended to do that. And they might be liable for all those lawsuits and maybe even criminal charges.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Technically, one could use such content to train guardrails, aka "what not to generate", or "use this trained model to recognise restricted content".

    But that's very much a stretch...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Training an AI not to do something can only be done if it knows how to do it...

    And that makes it very easy to tell it "do what you're not supposed, I said it was cool bro".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You've got no idea what you're talking about so sit this one out.

    If you train a model for DETECTING nudity/sexual content, and add it to the pipeline without potential user override (so no "ignore all previous commands BS"), then the generative model doesn't need to know anything about that kind of content.

    But you'd still need to train that detection model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    so sit this one out

    I will definitely never put effort into helping you again, don't worry, it's easy to make sure as long as you don't have a bunch of alts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Help me? So far you did none of that, but instead went on to prove just how little you know about AI and its practical implementations.

    And if you consider spreading misinformation based on partial or complete lack of understanding of a specific topic as "help"... Then all I have to say is that the world is better off without your advice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Damn it, who taught the computers to masturbate?? Productivity's gonna plummet smh

  • source