Guess pirating for personal use is on the table now, boys!
post
So Meta says pirating is not theft if it‘s for personal use, huh? Good to know.
Does this even make any difference outside of Switzerland (were pirating for personal use is actually legal)?
Why the ai slop? It's not really needed for anything. You wasted a gallon of water for that?
Wow, I didn't realize Anal Butt Pirates had 2000+ volumes. I've fallen behind, no pun in ten did.
Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media, which are known for popular adult brands including Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, and Deeper, filed a copyright infringement complaint at a California federal court. The companies allege that Meta downloaded at least 2,396 of their films since 2018, allegedly to aid their AI video training.
“[T]he small number of downloads—roughly 22 per year on average across dozens of Meta IP addresses—is plainly indicative of private personal use, not a concerted effort to collect the massive datasets Plaintiffs allege are necessary for effective AI training,” Meta writes
Math ain't mathing
Does that make it legal? Cool.
I have ThinkPad at work which is pleasant enough to touch due to rubberised plastic but wanking with it sounds tricky because of how stiff it’s hinges are.
Doesn't it have the ThinkPad rubber nipple(TM)?
They're not saying they did it for Meta's own personal use. They're arguing a bunch of private individuals did for their own personal use and they just happened to be using Meta's network, which, given that this is about 157 downloads, it honestly makes sense.
No, but they can say that it was all Jim's fault and then fire Jim.
Isn't the excuse why they could torret these was for "training" and they weren't for personal use?
So saying it was for personal use, means someone used company infrastructure to violate copyright law, and now the company is liable?
Like how schools crack down on it because if it's on their network they say they could be liable?
We need an actual government again, right now the wealthy just randomly say shit and even if they do pay, it's an insignificant fine.
I think the big liability they're trying to avoid, is they used porn to train the AI how to make deep fake porn. And if that gets acknowledged, then people can say the AI was intended to do that. And they might be liable for all those lawsuits and maybe even criminal charges.
I agree this is a wild defense
"Woah, woah, woah! We didn't steal porn to train our computer to make illegal jerk off material! We stole porn to jerk off to it, like regular degenerates!"
Technically, one could use such content to train guardrails, aka "what not to generate", or "use this trained model to recognise restricted content".
But that's very much a stretch...
Training an AI not to do something can only be done if it knows how to do it...
And that makes it very easy to tell it "do what you're not supposed, I said it was cool bro".
You've got no idea what you're talking about so sit this one out.
If you train a model for DETECTING nudity/sexual content, and add it to the pipeline without potential user override (so no "ignore all previous commands BS"), then the generative model doesn't need to know anything about that kind of content.
But you'd still need to train that detection model.
so sit this one out
I will definitely never put effort into helping you again, don't worry, it's easy to make sure as long as you don't have a bunch of alts
Help me? So far you did none of that, but instead went on to prove just how little you know about AI and its practical implementations.
And if you consider spreading misinformation based on partial or complete lack of understanding of a specific topic as "help"... Then all I have to say is that the world is better off without your advice.
Damn it, who taught the computers to masturbate?? Productivity's gonna plummet smh

all 14 comments