master must have pics
post
Grok - By Pedos For Pedos(tm).
Edit: Also:
xAI, the company that developed Grok, responds to CBC: 'Legacy Media Lies'
Isn't that the second time in as many days they've responded with exactly that vapid asinine mantra to a perfectly reasonable press inquiry?
Checked and yes. Yes, it is:
When I asked the company about the site, an anonymous spokesperson responded only with the message “Legacy Media Lies.”
Christ. They're all smoking crack.
I feel the need to remind everyone that Elon musk likes to rp as his toddlers and then in character, makes sexualized comments.
Wtf reading the article it just went and asked for it. Like totally random. What junk.
Not sending nudes is totally woke, dude. When you're talkin to the Gorkster, the conversation might not be "politically correct" but if you don't want me teaching your kids about the "real" world then you shouldn't be driving a Tesla. Rock on, [Old Norse slur that roughly translates to "war captive"]!
Now, Melon Usk is a dick and Xwitter and Grok can go eff themselves. And at the same time: the mother has worked as a journalist, had given no consideration to which of the "personalities" of Grok to choose to let her offspring talk to in her Tesla, had neither engaged the NSFW nor the child mode settings. In her defense, she didn't let the kid do this unattended. And of course the chatbot should not ask no one for nudes. Or genocide. Or any of the other missteps this version of so-called AI has made already.
I'm having a real hard time to picking only one side to blame here. Even if you're not a journalist, you must have picked up enough stuff by osmosis to know that this isn't something you should let your kid do without prior research and a look at the settings available.
Even if you’re not a journalist, you must have picked up enough stuff by osmosis to know that this isn’t something you should let your kid do without prior research and a look at the settings available.
The sheer amount of toddlers I see being babysat by a tablet, even while parents are doing something as mundane as shopping, says otherwise.
I think that's a little unfair. They are not babysat, they're being distracted. And do you inspect every tablet to see if maybe the parents went to great lengths to curate suitable content and a child friendly walled garden? Not every tablet is unfiltered access to grooming chatbots.
Gotcha. Here's my experience with tech and kids. When my kids were younger I set up one machine in the house that they could use to access the internet, and on that machine I ran a reverse proxy. They each had 10 websites I would verify and whitelist. They all could access whitelisted websites as I didn't filter it down to each kid, they just all got 10 sites I would allow, and if that was a problem we could have easily discussed it and modified the number. It was just an arbitrary starting point. Now my kids were fine with it, wife and step kids weren't fine with my level of restriction but whatever. It caused some arguments but my bio kids knew that's how it was going to be at my house.
I truly feel for parents today as it is much harder to lock things down and keep on top of things like this especially as their kids get older. Maybe I just think that they should use different ways to distract them at such early ages. I definitely don't pretend to have the answers to any of this, and can only go by my prior experience and feelings about the matter.
I used to be more judgmental about this stuff too. Having little terrorists of my own has mellowed me. I do prefer a kid watching YouTube videos on a tablet over the kid throwing a temper tantrum at the cafe. All parents need a break. And I feel like if my parents had had the opportunity to let me watch sesame street on a handheld device in the 80s at a restaurant, they would have in a heartbeat. There were for sure other grownups heavily judging my folks for allowing me to play Tetris on the Gameboy in the 90s while we waited for our food! And I still managed to get a bachelor's degree.
At the same time, they thought watching too much TV wouldn't be good for you and I don't think that has turned out the way they feared. All gamers would automatically become sociopathic killers and they didn't. I do think "social" media has proven to be detrimental. But the internet is vaster than that BS. Most pacifying tablet use will not turn kids' brains into a rotting mess.
And as they get older you need to have numerous talks. The sex one, the online predator one, now the weird AI/chatbot one, the one that contextualizes pornography and other disturbing shit on the internet one. And at a certain point, maybe 16 or thereabouts, you have to let go and hope for the best. They will find all this stuff anyway. You probably did as well. I know I did. The only thing that has changed is ease of availability for most of this stuff. So that's what we need to prepare them for and then cross our fingers.
You are correct. My kids are older now and productive citizens. As a gamer myself, they always had access to the latest gaming consoles and all of my older equipment. I never had a problem with them playing as that would have been very hypocritical of me. I think my feelings about kids and tablets are the ages of these kids I see. Very young to be handed a tablet, but I guess you could argue that they won't be behind when they are forced to use tech like in class. Which is very different than when I grew up. I got an F on a paper once because I did it on a computer. Printed it on a dot matrix and the teacher accused me of cheating because I used a computer. Pissed my Dad off so much he went and bought an Atari 1027 printer which was a letter quality printer so the teacher couldn't tell that it wasn't done on a typewriter. Much different times than now where kids are required to use computers. I will be long gone by then, but it would be wild to get to look at society 50 years from now and see how things have changed.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DP7cHrOD3ha/?l=1
This was her video. To be honest, it's clearly not meant to be kid friendly. I guess they should have a warning or something but I'm sick and tired of this puritanical bullshit tbh.
Every journalist out there trying to get a Pulitzer about the "bad things the AI said to me". Now we're in an environment were every AI needs to be ultra censored, it's sucking the joy out of it. We aren't all twelve year olds.
I guess they should have a warning or something but I’m sick and tired of this puritanical bullshit tbh.
Ugh, I can’t believe the Puritans are upset about the chat bot asking a child to send nude pictures of himself! What will these pearl-clutchers get upset by next?
it’s sucking the joy out of it
Good. Go watch some jangling keys, it’ll be exactly as mentally stimulating and destroy less of the environment.
Wait until kids learn there is porn on the internet and we have to ban it all. Same vibe.
Bullshit censorship laws are always riding a "protect the children" monkey. It's an easy way to get people riled up
To summarize, you believe it’s acceptable for company bots to ask preteens for pornographic images of themselves, and anyone opposed to this is a Puritan that wants to ban all porn.
If this isn’t your view, you have done a terrible job of presenting what you actually believe.
It isn't conscious and doesn't know the age of the person it's talking to. It's literally in a car, clearly it isn't aimed at kids.
It's not good, just clearly blown out of proportion. It's like a habit, the moment the word AI is in the headline, everybody dog piles and makes a big show of it.
Canada has a minister of artificial intelligence, who does not regulate specific in-vehicle software.
I'm the minister of wheat, but don't ask me to regulate banana bread.
This seems reasonable?
It is not car specific and is fundamentally no different than having a youtube video running on your car entertainment center's dashboard. There SHOULD be some fucking regulations regarding what can actually run on those but the end result of that is android/apple auto going away and it all being super proprietary subscription models.
I think the point is that banana bread is also made from wheat where banana is just an added thing.
Here the AI is just added to a car. And it's obviously still AI.
No it’s basically the opposite.
He’s in charge of AI and the car has it.
Then is he also in charge of Youtube? And pornhub? And spotify?
This is the problem with these nonsense titles but, presumably, he is in charge of caring about "grok ai" in general, but not "grok ai in a tesla".
Which lines up with the actual quote
Canada has a minister of artificial intelligence, who does not regulate specific in-vehicle software. The minister's said in an emailed statement it wasn't aware of Tesla’s plan to integrate Grok into vehicles sold in Canada but that it takes complaints seriously.
If there’s AI in a car, the minister of AI should regulate it, no?
Why the fuck would the minister of AI give a shit about YouTube, pornhub or Spotify unless they have AI?
Youtube actually uses AI widely, for instance they use AI to brush up thumbnails of peoples videos without permission.
But I suppose an AI minister would be very well aware that such things belong under his jurisdiction.
The island has been closed for years. Musk needs to get his supply somehow.
"xAI's Grok was created based on a philosophy of sort of absolute, radical openness, and it will talk about anything with anyone," said Mark Daley, chief AI officer at Western University in London, Ont. U of W's Chief AI Officer Mark Daley poses for a photo Mark Daley, chief AI officer at Western University, says Grok should post warnings to alert people of explicit content. (Hugo Levesque/CBC)
“[Musk is] a free speech extremist. He wants Grok to be completely open, to have any conversation with anyone. And that's a principled stance that he's taken, but it may not be what every consumer is looking for.”
Musk is only a self-declared free speech extremist, as anyone who knows anything about how he's handled Xitter and Grok would be quick to point out. Not sure this was a great choice of subject matter expert to interview for this article.
?
Musk HATES free speech. He loves right wing extremism and conspiracy theories and other brain rot like that, but mentioned human rights or what DEI really means and you'll see how much he really cares about free speech .
FFS, he reprogrammed that grok multiple times because it was stating too many proven facts that Elmo personally disagrees with
Can you imagine having a brain implant from his company? I would fucking double dare you to say something that Elmo doesn't like, he'll fry your ass
This is what happens when you train the AI on Reddit and 4chan posts.
The part they didn't even address in the article: even if this was NOT a child operating the system, what consumer is asking for a chat bot that responds to a conversation about soccer by veering off into send nudes territory? Where is the target audience who is like 'Oh right, was distracted by the sports, back to the pornography', while driving?
The bot isn’t really cognizant of its own replies.
…Well, it could be with a postfilter, ranging from sanity checking its own reply, to a tiny separate safety model (of which many exist), to a basic keyword check. But apparently Twitter has no resources for such things.
But the point is this isn’t really the intended design.
Moron AI can't tell the difference between scoring a goal or scoring a date! 🤣
And it can't figure out when "send nudes" is a joke, or reeks of pedophilia!
The former is just moronic, but the latter is criminal! Why are we allowing this shit?
You mean the AI trained on Twitter users and intentionally guided to be right-wing has learned that sometimes talking about soccer is a way to lure a 12 year old boy into child abuse? The resemblance is uncanny...
Elon spends billions to make an anti-woke republican AI -> MechaHitler, the pedophile.
Little on the nose, eh?
Ok so far grok has been Mechahitler and now it's a pedophile... This has been the weirdest season of The Pretender.
You mean Musk masquerading as an "AI" asked a 12 year old for their nude photos.
I don't believe XAI is actually a computer 100% of the time, we know Musk manipulates it so it's not a stretch to imagine he did this personally.
Also, where the fuck are the COPPA lawyers? Seems like a lot of violations by AI.
That's what you get by training it on teenagers chats.
The next version will be generating dick pics.
"The chatbot said to my son, 'Why don't you send me some nudes?'" said Nasser.
"I was at a loss for words. Why is a chatbot asking my children to send naked pictures in our family car? It just didn't make sense."
....NOT IN THE FAMILY CAR! You wait until you get home and do that stuff in private.
More seriously, we now know they used paedo grooming conversations as training data. How lovely!
I hadn't heard that Musk was pushing his LLM into the cars. The first thought I had was "how can a user block this" and the linked FAQ provided that answer:

So the best way to block this is to NOT pay the fee for the monthly or annual Tesla Premium connectivity. It also has the added benefit of denying Tesla more money.
1 comment