post
Was she swimming against 5 trans swimmers or does she just suck?
She just sucks, and instead of trying to improve herself decided to hop on the conservative hate train to attack the trans woman. The three top spots were all cis women.
It's not only attacking one of the most vulnerable demographics in the country, but it's attacking one of the most vulnerable demographics in the country over the most pettiest bullshit I can imagine. She's upset because she didn't get 5th place.
It's not even that; she got fifth place. She's upset that she had to share fifth place with a trans woman. I also feel the need to point out that it was her last competitive event, so it's not exactly like competitive swimming is a vital component of her life that she kept doing moving forward. She's just a vile, terrible person who realized she could make a career as a right-wing grifter.
She’s upset because she didn’t get 5th place.
It's worse than that: she did get 5^th^ place.
In March 2022, while swimming for the University of Kentucky in the 200-yard freestyle at the NCAA championship (her final competitive event race), Gaines tied for fifth place with University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas, who subsequently became the first openly trans woman champion in the NCAA women's division after winning the 500-yard freestyle later at the same meet. While Thomas held the fifth-place trophy after the finish, Gaines held an equally-sized sixth-place trophy while waiting for another fifth-place trophy in the mail.
Whi h she genuinely lost, but it was close enough the judges had to check slow-motion, so she was wronged.
It's one of the most stereotypically conservative / republican grievances I've ever heard.
It's not the people at the top keeping the actual glory and/or money that are the problem. And it's not that you suck. The problem that other rando who is just a bit more disadvantaged in life than you but who is about to catch up to the amount of stuff you have!
She tied with a trans swimmer for 5th place. During the ceremony, they didn’t have two 5th places trophies so they had one hold 5th and one hold 6th. She held the 6th and threw a fit about it.
Cardio sports such as swimming and running are actually more difficult for transgender women Strength based sports tend to be easier for them.
I really encourage people to watch the Last Week Tonight segment on trans sports. It’s really good and it specifically calls out this exact incident.
My favorite part is when trump says he could beat her in a race.

the ultimate humiliation.
she looks like she just got a massive whiff of his diaper in the same moment she got hella insulted
We knew he couldn't help himself at the opportunity for more sexual assault, but damn guy, during a race?
Why are they getting a trophy for 5th and 6th? Is that normal for swimming.
Yes shes no doubt a good swimmer, I've just never seen a 5th place trophy.
I think it was an NCAA Championship event, but I don’t know much about swimming competitions.
She was beaten by four cis women for sure and one trans woman by a split second, who the judges had to check photo-finish for fifty place (gains placed sixth)
She just sucked really, really hard. And why is it always 5th place? The girl who said she lost to a transgender runner a few years ago didn't make it 2nd or 3rd... but also 5th (or maybe 6th). So even if those runners weren't there. She still would have gotten nothing.
Stop! Stop! She's already dead! 😢
It's amazing, the stupid shit that having hundreds of thousands of people praising you can get you to believe.
Like how Riley Gaines was ever a good athlete.
Riley Gaines is the biggest loser ever!
Our future president
It won’t really matter what she says, because republicans won’t hear this argument. They live in a different online reality than we do.
Her whole schtick was how a trans athlete made her a victim by usurping her natural, deserved finish position. AOC's dig lays bare that she wasn't even destined for the podium and that her elevated position in the speaking circuit is predicated on obfuscation, omissions, and willful ignorance.
This very well could've been the first time someone learned the underlying truth about this grifter.
I'm sorry since when is athletic performance something we can't criticize? That's such a bizarre statement. I can't imagine how on Earth you came to the conclusion that someone's actions cannot be criticized.
It's understandable to not criticise or rank the athletic performance of someone just going to the gym for their own health, but in this situation we're straight up talking about a person who specifically chose that their whole career is to have their athletic performance ranked and criticised.
you’re saying it’s cool to criticize physical aspects of a person over which they only have so much control?
When that person's famous for actively pushing transphobic policies by pretending they're a top athlete? Yes. Nothing wrong with not being the very best. I certainly am not at anything.
Again you keep saying physical aspects as if someone's athletic performance is something they're born with. A person's performance on a field of play or what have you is not something they're given at Birth. It's an extremely ignorant thing to say. Those four swimmers that beat her didn't beat her because they were predestined to, they beat her because they put in the work. They beat her because they had the mental drive and physical dedication to work harder than she did. Maybe if she didn't spend so much time thinking about how much she hated transsexual people how much she wanted them exterminated and how easy it would be to grift conservative morons she would have done better. Although to be fair I thought about that last for a few times myself.
I've seen some lazy sea lion performances in my day, but this is might take the cake.
Seriously? We're in a trans community, and you're saying it's cool to criticize physical aspects of a person over which they only have so much control?
That's such a dumb assertion. Sure there are some athletes that have inborn physical advantages in some sports but the vast majority of athletes are just regular people that train very hard. Also even those innate physical advantages will not make it a guarantee that someone wins in that sport, they still need to put in the work in training before they can take advantage of them.
For example, even though Michael Phelps has a longer than average arm span that doesn't mean he can jump in the water with no training and win the Olympics. The man wouldn't have gotten all those medals if he didn't train constantly since he was 11.
Look, you're in the wrong. Learn and grow from it. Or at least try.
Riley Gaines came equal fifth with a trans woman, and then spun that into a narrative where competing with trans women is unfair on cis women. The top four finishers were cis women. She lies, constantly, about how the system was stacked against her, when she's just not a very good swimmer. She brought the conversation onto this topic, that she would actually be able to excel if the playing field were "fair". Pointing out that she wouldn't is not only reasonable, but it's important to do, because it lays bare the fact that both her and the trans woman that's caused her to feel so disaffected are equally not that good compared to their peers.
It's really bold of you, a cis person, to come into a trans space, and tell us all off for 'being mean to' someone who you admitted you had never heard of, when she is a TERF who has used her platform to help pass trans sports bans in a number of states. It has a real "you must be tolerant of the intolerant" vibe to it. I think you should try and be introspective about the privilege that you have, that's led you to have this opinion.
Riley Gaines is a hate monger and a grifter. She is a disgusting and vile creature! (ie. A typical republikkklan) She deserves all the vitriol she receives, plus a lot more. I'd be good mocking her for her obvious lack of intelligence, too, as well as her loser attempt to blame another for her own life failures.
No. You just can't admit that you're wrong, or at least, well out of step with popular opinion, so you are doubling down. I'm just unsure whether you like the albeit negative attention, or whether you need to always be right. Neither of those are positive traits, although I'll grant you points for having a strong mind. A strong, SMART mind, however, would intuit when to back off.....
That fact you're triggered enough[...]
You played your hand of being a shitty person. Please leave this space now.
- No, I'm not going to go trawling your history, I simply don't care enough
- The rest of the world does exist you know.
- You can be a shitty person based off some things and not others. The way you've acted in this thread and especially using the word triggered in that fashion while talking to a minority group, isn't a good look. Maybe you could try being introspective instead of making light of trauma and PTSD.
Double down and don't learn anything? Of course you will ! I didn't expect anything else, tbh.
The point is that they wouldn't have won if there wasn't a trans person competing. They would, at most, get fourth place. AOC was considerably diminishing the feeling of injustice (in comparison to not getting first place).
The left is always expected not to "sink to their level" and look where that has gotten us. The entire world is lied to, constantly, right-wing politicians are also constantly making claims about left-wing ones being nut jobs, being communist, being terrorists.
Right-wing people make claims like, being trans is a mental illness, or that trans people are dangerous, or that trans people are pretending to be trans to compete in womens sports.
The minute a left-wing politician stands up and says: "You are a fucking asshole" they are held to a higher standard. It HAS to stop. We HAVE to be able to talk back. If we keep being polite and taking the higher road, they will continue to RAILROAD us, because the forceful and outspoken seem to win the narrative.
Case in point: If AOC had said something nice and polite here, we wouldn't be reading it.
where Gaines placed in a sports competition is precisely relevant and needed to be pointed out. perhaps you're suggesting the way it was done could have been more polite?
but... why? when they are actively seeking out eradication why do you insist that being polite about facts is important?
AOC is right and that quip does attack the shifting of responsibility.
In one simple statement AOC pointed out that Riley wouldn't have won the race she used to build her anti-trans platform. The swimmer has been careful to present herself as a champion, when in reality she started her campaign after tying for fifth place with a trans woman.
If someone doesn't know what the issue is about, why does their opinion matter?
This is the internet, literally anything can be misconstrued. Someone on here called me a nazi yesterday. If you check my modlog I was banned from a community for fascism.
Criticizing a valid, informed statement about an issue that's challenging people's identities because of how it might appear is like clutching pearls while your house is on fire.
Speaking of personal failings, this take you've got here might be a good piece for you to cut out and paste into your own personal fail collage.
I'm honestly a little disappointed.
First-past-the-post forces AOC to be critical of terrible people.
Not sinking to their level got us here in the first place. Calling people out on their bullshit is not only necessary, but crucial in forming a civilized society.
Always call out assholes and liars.
If you play in competitive sports publicly, you are openly allowing people to criticize your performance in said sport.
That is quite literally how competitive sports work.
It directly has something to do with it though. She has claimed, again and again and again, that she would have been the best in her sport if not for trans women, when she came fifth behind four other cis women. Her activism actually got the NCAA to strip all titles from all trans women that have competed in the women's division, including Lia Thomas' fifth place finish against her. Let me repeat that, she is such a sore loser that she got the woman who tied with her for fifth place's title stripped.
Also, did you even read the article and watch the linked video? A senator literally says she would have been the best without Lia Thomas competing, and she goes along with that. https://youtu.be/WZDYue_p2lo
all 97 comments