all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is just what I need. A few months ago, SeaFile shat the bed and I just could be bothered to fix it. It's deployment is a mess - a server, then a frontend host, a reverse proxy, a database - all in one container!

So I will try this out. I was contemplating building a thing like this myself, so I can contribute fixes/features too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    SeaFile shat the bed and I just could be bothered to fix it. It’s deployment is a mess

    OMG. YES! I tried to install Seafile in my environment, but I gave up after a few days. I got it partially running, but some requests weren't making it past the 100th proxy for some reason. idk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why are you not simply using nextcloud?

    Why would you want that all in one container? That sounds like a bad system. I like docker / podman especially because I can separate the containers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I've tried nextcloud, it felt too slow.

    Why would you want that all in one container?

    I don't want it, SeaFile provides only such conglomerate Dockerfile. And I didn't have much success with writing my own Dockerfile for it. It's terrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • 16 comments in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    The installation workflow begs for supply-chain exploits. Given this and its oob install, it probably breaks iso27002 as well.

    I'll wait. NextCloud and OwnCloud both have 27002-compliant installs (the latter needs some review), so I need to stick with those.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Bitching about nextcloud seems to be some people's hobby around here.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    To be honnest, Nextcloud is kinda a piece of shit software. Every major version break something, an error in an extension can make it crash entirely without any failsafe preventing it. I already lost the database twice (in what... 5 major versions), and the only reason I still use it is because I'm too lazy to use anything not in the TrueNAS apps repository.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It's not bitching if it's true. Nextcloud has really poor performance alone, it tries to do to many things at once and none of it ends up being good. It was amazing for it's time and it's idea but it simply doesn't scale, not technically, not with time. They need to redo the architecture and probably move to something better performing than PHP. I never heard anyone in any environment even considering PHP as an option in 2025.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    It's fine if you use the AIO or do some specific things on baremetal like Postgres and Redis. I've used in virtually every format over the last dozen years, and you eventually learn what works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Looks really nice and seems like it should be a great foundation for future development. Personally I can't lose Nextcloud until there are sufficiently featureful and reliable clients for Linux, Windows, Android that synchronize a local copy and help manage the inevitable file deconfliction (Nextcloud Desktop only barely qualifies at this, but it does technically qualify and that represents the minimum viable product for me). I'm not sure a WebDav client alone is enough to satisfy this criteria, but I am not going to pretend I am actually familiar with any WebDav clients so maybe they already exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Checkout opencloud, owncloud clients are compatible with it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    Are they? I did not know that! This changes things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Im using the android client no problem. Not sure about the the desktop ones, if you want I cant do some basic testing and report back, just let me know which clients

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    That is super kind of you!

    I'm not sure which clients. I haven't installed opencloud, because I didn't see any clients for it on a cursory look. I tried nextcloud, but it kept failing after updates, so now I just use cron jobs to automate manual backup scripts I wrote to an external HDD. If you do test any desktop OC clients and find any "good enough" ones, I'll start with it : ) and if you don't get to test any, know that I still truly appreciate your offer!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Had today some time to take the linux desktop client for a test drive. It works without problem.

    It is a appimage wich is for my taste not idea but it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I've tried several WebDav clients, and I've found that the great majority will work great. Their performance will depend on the server. For example, Nextcloud was slow. CopyParty was blazing fast, as if it was a local folder.

    You might want to checkout CopyParty too, it's UX/UI sucks, but you don't need to see it, since you can use it with almost any client on any platform via any protocol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment