Photo of the White House with an under construction Death Star

top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Do you mean Epstein ball room?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ballroom? You mean the Pedo Pavilion?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Epstein Ballroom

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/conservatives-newfound-interest-obamas-feet-flna8C11112572

    Back in the day, the GOP was in a tizzy because Obama put his feet on the office desk.

  • source
  • I’m sorry, this is waaaaaaay better than that gaudy 3rd rate piece of trash that’s actually being built.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Aren't you a little short for a death star?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Where’d they get the kieber crystals

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right in the trumper!
    Terrorists have placed an explosive device down a narrow but exposed Epstein corridor & blew up all the balls in the room.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Is this "AI"? I need to know if it's ok to like. \s

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Nuke it from orbit... It's the only way to be sure.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No one commenting on all the trees. Washington is basically on giant cement monument

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Taking ball-room a bit literally there, innit?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's no ballroom

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'd actually be down for the ballroom if it looked like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm okay with destruction when it suits my esthetic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, it's not the first time part of the white house has been torn down or renovated. What I personally dislike about this isn't that they're changing the white house. It's that they're changing the white house to accomodate Trumps constant need to be the center of attention.

    It'd be silly to keep the white house as built (Or reconstructed) in 1817, since it's actually being used, and is very much a workplace, but this renovation is just Trump needing somewhere in-house to host lavish dinner parties to be the center of attention.

    So yes, I am absolutely okay with destruction when it suits my esthetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Or the lack of any transparency or planning.... Anyone else try to do this s*** especially democratic the Republicans would be up in arms.... No individual should be able to unilaterally make these changes that's not what the president's job is

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • Only way to fix it is to fly a jet into it

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's cleaned by MEGA MAID

  • source