That's a country where being brown is dangerous, not being straight.

Though being the straight partner to a brown person can be dangerous here (even if you yourself are not brown), so I guess it does work in a way.

Do you know you're being disingenuous?

Straight people aren't being murdered for being straight.

None of your points are examples of how it's dangerous to be straight.

No.

The answer to your first question is: "No. Not at all. That is independent of sexual orientation."

And "openly expressing an urge to fuck" at work vs "get in your gimp suit and party on a float" at a public event.... If you can't sus out the difference between those two situations, no wonder you are afraid of getting in trouble...

What a dumb argument.

From what I observed the people who consider the concept of consent flawed and are discussing how it could be improved upon, so the safety and comfort of all people involved is protected seems, are the same people who fights for women's right. There is a great RadioLab dive in on the topic - I honestly couldn't recommend it enough). People who demands straight pride parades uses any edge cases of consent going wrong to weaponize it into "it happened, so the consent was there". If you're genuinely concern about safety and well-being of man, you're putting your effort in a wrong place.

They also fucked kids and had slaves, so I wouldn't look to the Greeks and Romans for your standards.

Not saying that gay is bad, just that your reference is.

It was only dangerous for slaves

Do you have a link about this? Not arguing, we are genuinely curious.