cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51070777

"Yet, they never have the funds for healthcare coverage for all," said Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib.

all 76 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 177 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Yet, they never have the funds for healthcare coverage for all

But Agentina now has.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 132 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    America is paying for Argentina's Universal Healthcare, without having their own.

    The art of the deal, or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I guess Argentina read his book

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I bet he has a special edition with plenty of pictures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I wonder what the US could do with $40 billion? By the way, that's nearly $300 per taxpayer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    $40 billion was the entire annual budget of USAID. No matter what you think of them, they did provided essential aid to dozens of nations, and DOGE destroyed them under the pretense of lowering the deficit. Now we're spending that much money just to prop up one countries economy.

    (Yes, I know they USAID is a soft-power tool of American imperialism, and is rumored to have been used as cover for CIA operations, but they also did a shit-load of global AIDs prevention work, and I'd rather have spent the $40 billion on that than bailing out a libertarian freak so Rob Citrone can get rich.)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I mean the entire doge "savings" were instantly wiped out by the $200 billion increase in military spending. And I say savings incredibly generously because there are a ton of studies that say the agencies and people they cut will leave a hole in federal capabilities that will end up costing the American people way more than all of the money they claim to have saved (Some speculate the massive cuts to the IRS alone will end up costing about $1 trillion in lost tax collections).

    But this combined with the cost of the shutdown and the farmer bailout and so much more is just icing on the cake I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Oh yeah, for sure. Everything DOGE did was a farce, and it almost certainly lost more money than it saved. Even en if it didn't, they blew any savings up on their first budget legislation. I just find it particularly hypocritical to cut $40 billion in global aid because, "we don't have the money," then turn around and spend $40 billion on global aid to a single country

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    has he even started bailing out the farmers yet? the gop is hoping the Ds come back into the power, so the gop can mess it up next election again. it will be a problem if the gop is still in power and they dont get to blame the Ds anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The country is totally fucked up when he can just decide to spend 40 Billion on a whim.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Isn't there a shutdown? Because they can't agree on a budget? And now there's no money even to pay government employees? So where is this money suddenly coming from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Governments can literally just spend money into existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I guess I know where his next villa will be once his term is over

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Thats 2.6 million dollars for every school district in the United States.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Making Argentina Great Again

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So how much would it cost to give American's healthcare?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Health care somewhat pays for itself. Not the really sick people, but making sure workers are healthy to actually work properly has a massive return on investment.

    The other part is taking care of general health. Things like cars, bad food, all sorts of pollution and so forth really are bad for health. If you have public health care it is often cheaper to fix the underlying issue then to treat the problems coming from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    0, USA has no interest in giving people free or extremely subsidized healthcare, they lose thier political wedge issues, trump card for both sides. the DNC can say they would to wet thier appetite, and the GOP can say they are against it, because of this or that is not effective. and also REPUBLICAN recepients make up a large percentage of medicaid, snap benefits too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I know a Trump supporting single father, who as someone it is absolutely meant for, uses SNAP benefits. And then turns around and says it shouldn't exist and votes for Trump. The people are all dumb, government will hang their carrots and nothing will change weeee

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Argentina, Israel and Qatar first.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    #NOKINGS 10/18/25 - Find your local protest: https://www.nokings.org/#map

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What a fucking dumb asshole

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    For 40B, I could probably build a big enough carbon sink to fix global warming.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Out of curiosity, what does this do to the USD? I know it is a "small" amount relative to our country, but if they are swapping $40b in U.S. Dollars for a currency of high volatility, isnt it a guaranteed loss of believed stability in those USD up to that amount?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Soft power I guess? Maybe strings to dump us agricultural produce that is losing their market due to taco shenanigans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Actually thanks to US money, Argentina was able to support its farmers by lower export tariffs for soy beans. They then sold a hell of a lot of those to China. Soy beans used to be the biggest US export to China.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe in turn us gets to sell it's GMO seeds to Argentina exclusively, displacing local seeds/agricultural self sufficiency forever? Idk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Milei wants to dollarize Argentina. Ones you do that, it is very hard to move to your own currency again and it would give the US massive influence over Argentina. The good news is that Argentina has a much more functional democracy then the US and their parliament is stopping Milei from doing too much bs. So probably this is going to fail.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Lol soft power.

    Oh you mean like all of the soft power that we built up over the past 80 years and has been completely wiped in the past 10 months?

    Soft power like that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What are you talking about the dems made sure we had absolutely no soft power and were Enslaved to the commie libs since Reagan!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    First of course, it's disrespectful to make insinuations to a sovereign country about whom they may vote into office.

    Secondly, Trump doesn't have authority to give loans.

    He's probably trying to deceive Argentinian voters with false hope of generous loans (which have to be paid back, I should note).

    However, in the US, financial decisions are made by Congress. Certainly on the scale of tens of billons. The president has discretion to move far smaller sums.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Aren't Argentinan soy farmers basically stealing American soy farmer's sales? Its almost like American farmers voting for this City Slicker Real Estate loser hate themselves or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This will fail. Argentina is a habitual financial crisis center. And they will spend only more money to prop them up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    bessenet friends made bad investments in argentina so they asked to be bailed out, but they cant do it in the form of a real bailout, but hide as guise, under AID to argentina, which is really to bailout his friends.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I was more under the opinion that he was setting up an escape plan just like the Nazis.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Double or nothing. Trump firmly believes in the Martingale strategy. It's part of the art of the deal.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Americans get the government they deserve (and voted for) 🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🖕🇺🇸

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe Trump should buy Islas Malvinas from Argentina.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 8 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Here is the real reason for bailouts. They need the funds to stay high.

    Those efforts have been complicated by the fact that major hedge funds, including those led by friends of Mr. Bessent, stand to benefit financially from an Argentina economic lifeline. Funds at investment firms including BlackRock, Fidelity and Pimco are heavily invested in Argentina, as are investors such as Stanley Druckenmiller and Robert Citrone, both of whom worked with Mr. Bessent when he was an investor for George Soros.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Fascism first

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    When I read about this, all I think about is the Nazis fleeing to Argentina after WW2. Idk if this is related or not, but makes me wonder.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/lefty_news@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    crypto bros first

  • source